DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jphtcr.v5i1.13752

Path Analysis : Public Health Impacts Overview in High Natural Background Radiation Area in Botteng, West Sulawesi of Indonesia

1Department of Environmental Health, Politeknik Kesehatan Bandung, Cimahi, Indonesia

2Pusat Teknologi Keselamatan Radiasi Dan Metrologi, Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia

3Omdurman Islamic University, Geography Department, Omdurman City, Sudan, Sudan

Received: 28 Feb 2022; Published: 30 Apr 2022.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 The authors. Published by Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Diponegoro
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Introduction: The effect of ionizing radiation exposure in a human being is chromosome aberrations. Botteng has the highest annual radiation exposure rate in Indonesia, which is 6,15 ± 0,81 mSv/year. The people in Botteng were exposed to the low dose radiation, continuously. The purpose of this research is to describe the pathway radiation exposured to inhabitants and the cytogenetic response in the high natural background radiation area.

Methods : This is a statistical research by cross-sectional. The population is 61 residents, who were chosen randomly from 9 different exposure rate areas. Path analysis model is used to determine the linearity relationship between internal and external radiation dose to the frequency of chromosomal aberrations in lymphocyte cells.

Results: The results concluded that the external radiation dose rate is 5.49 mSv / year, the internal radiation dose rate is 10.34 mSv / year, the effective dose rate of lymphocyte cells is 1.92 mSv / year, and the mean of chromosome aberrations frequency is 0.00082 of approximately 14,695 metaphase cells observed. The result of the analysis showed that there was no significant correlation between the external dose and the chromosome aberrations frequency. There is a linear relationship between the internal dose and the chromosome aberrations frequency (f count = 6,634 and p-value 0,013 <0,05). The internal and external radiation dose simultaneously affects the effective dose (R2 = 0.901, p-value = 0,000> 0.05), The Internal and external radiation doses affect the chromosome aberrations frequency of peripheral blood lymphocytes only through effective doses (R2 = 0.093, p-value = 0.017> 0.05)

Conclusion: this study provide an effective recommendation for further research as an effort to improve public health in areas with high natural background radiation.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: chromosome aberrations frequency; high natural background radiation; radioecology; public health; radioadaptive response
Funding: The research was supported by General Project of Center for Technology of Radiation Safety, Nuclear Energy Agency of Indonesia

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Determination of Fit to Work Status for Thyroid Cancer Survivor: A Case Study in Occupational Health Setting Readiness of Water Sanitation and Hygiene Facilities (WASH) as an Effort to Prevent COVID-19 Transmission in Elementary Schools at Ngaliyan District, Semarang City Youth Empowerment in the Integration Program of Stunting Prevalence Reduction in East Java during Covid-19 Pandemic: A Document Review More recent articles
  1. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Scientific Report: summary of low-dose radiation effects on health. United Nations Publication. 2011. 4–14 p. Available at http://www.unscear.org/docs/publications/2010/UNSCEAR_2010_Report.pdf
  2. Ramadhani D, Syaifudin M, Nurhayati S, Tetriana D, Rahardjo T, Mailana W, et al. Assessment of DNA damage in lymphocytes of Mamuju (a high background radiation area) inhabitants using alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis. Int J Low Radiat. 2017;10(4):314
  3. Setiawan A, Pudjadi E, Laju P, Radiasi D, Di G, Pulau W, et al. Pemetaan Laju Dosis Radiasi Gamma Di Wilayah Pulau Bangka. 2013;205–11
  4. Hasan Basri IK, Yusuf D, Rahardjo T, Nurhayati S, Tetriana D, Ramadhani D, et al. Study of γ-H2AX as DNA double strand break biomarker in resident living in high natural radiation area of Mamuju, West Sulawesi. J Environ Radioact. 2017;171:212–6
  5. Udiyani PM, Setiawan MB, Subekti M, Kuntjoro S, Pane JS, Hastuti EP, et al. Assessment of dose consequences based on postulated BDBA (beyond design basic accident) A-30MWt RSG-GAS after 30-year operation. Prog Nucl Energy. 2021;140:103927. doi: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103927
  6. George K, Willingham V, Wu H, Gridley D, Nelson G, Cucinotta FA. Chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes induced by 250 MeV protons: effects of dose, dose rate and shielding. Adv Sp Res. 2002 Jan 1;30(4):891–9
  7. Harty Krieg R, Hickey EE, Weber JR, Masnik MT. Nuclear Power Plants, Decommissioning of. Encycl Energy. 2004;409–20. doi: 10.1016/B0-12-176480-X/00415-0
  8. Amiro BD. Environmental Radioactivity. Encycl Phys Sci Technol. 2003;583–99. doi: 10.1016/B0-12-227410-5/00228-3
  9. Siegel MD, Bryan CR. Environmental Geochemistry of Radioactive Contamination. Treatise on Geochemistry. 2003 Dec 4;9–9:205–62
  10. Holly A. Swartz, Jessica C. Levenson and EFU. 乳鼠心肌提取 HHS Public Access. Physiol Behav. 2012;43(2):145–53
  11. Kravtsov V, Livanova A, Belyakov O, Fedortseva R. The frequency of lymphocytes containing dumbbell-shaped nuclei depends on ionizing radiation dose and correlates with appearance of chromosomal aberrations. Genome Integr. 2018;9(1):1–7
  12. Mothersill C, Seymour C. Low dose radiation mechanisms: The certainty of uncertainty. Mutat Res Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2022 Apr 1;876–877:503451
  13. Alatas Z. Paradigma Bard Efek Radiasi Dosis Rendah. Bul Al. 2011;13(2):242258
  14. Ramachandran EN, Karuppasamy C V., Kumar VA, Soren DC, Kumar PRV, Koya PKM, et al. Radio-adaptive response in peripheral blood lymphocytes of individuals residing in high-level natural radiation areas of Kerala in the southwest coast of India. Mutagenesis. 2017;32(2):267–73
  15. Marín A, Martín M, Liñán O, Alvarenga F, López M, Fernández L, et al. Bystander effects and radiotherapy. Reports Pract Oncol Radiother. 2015;20(1):12–21
  16. Lehnert BE, Goodwin EH. Extracellular factor(s) following exposure to α particles can cause sister chromatid exchanges in normal human cells. Cancer Res. 1997;57(11):2164–71
  17. Pillon S. Actinide-Bearing Fuels and Transmutation Targets. Compr Nucl Mater. 2012;3:109–41
  18. Burakov BE. Lava-Like Materials Formed and Solidified During Chernobyl Accident. Compr Nucl Mater Second Ed. 2020 Jul 22;525–39
  19. Liu J, Zhou J, Wu M, Hu CF, Yang J, Li D, et al. Low-dose total body irradiation can enhance systemic immune related response induced by hypofractionated radiation. Front Immunol. 2019;10(FEB):1–16
  20. Hekim N, Cetin Z, Nikitaki Z, Cort A, Saygili EI. Radiation triggering immune response and inflammation. Cancer Lett. 2015 Nov 28;368(2):156–63
  21. Georgakilas AG, Pavlopoulou A, Louka M, Nikitaki Z, Vorgias CE, Bagos PG, et al. Emerging molecular networks common in ionizing radiation, immune and inflammatory responses by employing bioinformatics approaches. Cancer Lett. 2015 Nov 28;368(2):164–72
  22. Schöllnberger H, Stewart RD, Mitchel REJ, Hofmann W. An Examination of Radiation Hormesis Mechanisms Using a Multistage Carcinogenesis Model. Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med. 2004;2(4):154014204909002
  23. Scott BR, Belinsky SA, Leng S, Lin Y, Wilder JA, Damiani LA. Radiation-stimulated epigenetic reprogramming of adaptive-response genes in the lung: An evolutionary gift for mounting adaptive protection against lung cancer. Dose-Response. 2009;7(2):104–31
  24. Liu SZ. Biological effects of low level exposures to ionizing radiation: Theory and practice. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2010;29(4):275–81
  25. Cui J, Yang G, Pan Z, Zhao Y, Liang X, Li W, et al. Hormetic response to low-dose radiation: Focus on the immune system and its clinical implications. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(2)
  26. Lumniczky K, Impens N, Armengol G, Candéias S, Georgakilas AG, Hornhardt S, et al. Low dose ionizing radiation effects on the immune system. Environ Int. 2021;149(June 2020)
  27. Manisalidis I, Stavropoulou E, Stavropoulos A, Bezirtzoglou E. Environmental and Health Impacts of Air Pollution: A Review. Front Public Heal. 2020;8(February):1–13
  28. Borzoueisileh S, Monfared AS, Abediankenari S, Mostafazadeh A, Khosravifarsani M. The effects of residence duration in high background radiation areas on immune surveillance. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2013 Jan;4(1):218—222. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.107295
  29. Venkat S, Apte SK, Chaubey RC, Chauhan PS. Radioadaptive response in human lymphocytes in vitro. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol Off organ Int Soc Environ Toxicol Cancer. 2001;20(3):165–75
  30. Bannister LA, Serran ML, Mantha RR. Low-Dose Gamma Radiation Does Not Induce an Adaptive Response for Micronucleus Induction in Mouse Splenocytes. Radiat Res. 2015 Nov;184(5):533–44
  31. Komova O, Krasavin E, Nasonova E, Mel’nikova L, Shmakova N, Cunha M, et al. Relationship between radioadaptive response and individual radiosensitivity to low doses of gamma radiation: an extended study of chromosome damage in blood lymphocytes of three donors. Int J Radiat Biol. 2018 Jan;94(1):54–61

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.