skip to main content

Analysis On Village Readiness In The Acceleration Of Open Defecation Free Achievement Status Based On Stimulus, Organism, And Response Approach

1Public Health Faculty, Universitas Jember, Jember, jawa Timur, Indonesia

2Management and Organizational Science, Faculty of Economic Science, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Science, Hungary

Received: 15 Mar 2021; Published: 30 Aug 2021.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 The authors. Published by Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Diponegoro
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Introduction: Open Defecation Free (ODF) is a condition in the community that has carried out total sanitation and does no more Open Defecation (OD). Dukuh Village was chosen as the research location because it was a village with the highest OD in Ngadiluwih, Kediri. This high rate of OD is caused by a lack of public awareness about the importance of sanitation. This research was conducted to analyze the village readiness to accelerate ODF status in Dukuh Village.

Methods: This study was done in a qualitative method with a single holistic case study design using Stimulus-Organism-Response theory. The key informants of this study were five persons:1) the Head of Dukuh Village, 2) the environmental health officer of Wonorejo Community Health Center, 3) Dukuh Village community leader and 4) the community representatives who still defecated, and 5) no more defecated in an open area after triggering activities. They were selected purposively. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, Focus Group Discussion, and documents review. Data analysis was done through the Spradley model, scoring and categorizing village readiness using the scales of Aydin and Tasci.

Results: Five main problems were the lack of funds for the ODF program, poor socialization, low Clean and Healthy Behavior, lack of roles from community leaders, and limited land for latrine construction. Based on the analysis of village readiness in achieving the ODF program using the Aydin & Tasci scale, the obtained score was 2.1. This score indicated that Dukuh Village was not ready yet and a lot of system improvements[h1]  were needed.

Conclusion: Dukuh Village was not ready yet for the ODF program and need a lot of system improvements. It was recommended to make village policies, create working groups, and maximizing socialization.

 

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  common.other
Copyright transfer agreement and EC
Subject
Type Other
  Download (365KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Open Defecation, village, sanitation, behavior, community

Article Metrics:

  1. Alemu F, Kumie A, Medhin G, Gebre T, Godfrey P. A socio-ecological analysis of barriers to the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:1:1–9
  2. Aydin CH, Tasci D. International Forum of Educational Technology & Society Measuring Readiness for e-Learning : Reflections from an Emerging Country Published by : International Forum of Educational Technology & Society Linked references are available on JSTOR for this arti. Journal of Educational Technology and Society. 2005;8:4:244–257
  3. Cameron L, Olivia S, Shah M. Scaling up sanitation: Evidence from an RCT in Indonesia. Journal of Development Economics. 2019;138:1–16
  4. Dinas Kesehatan Kab. Kediri. Profil Kesehatan Kabupaten Kediri Tahun 2019. Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Kediri. 2019:53–56
  5. Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Timur. Profil Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Timur. 2019:25–26
  6. Mosler HJ, Mosch S, Harter M. Is Community-Led Total Sanitation connected to the rebuilding of latrines? Quantitative evidence from Mozambique. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:5:1–16
  7. Odagiri M, Cronin AA, Thomas A, Kurniawan MA, Zainal M, Setiabudi W, et al. Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals for water and sanitation in Indonesia – Results from a five-year (2013–2017) large-scale effectiveness evaluation. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. 2020;230:113584
  8. Permenkes. Sanitasi Total Berbasis Masyarakat. Jakarta, Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 2014
  9. Riskesdas. Hasil Utama Riset Kesehata Dasar (RISKESDAS). 2018:1–200
  10. Routray P, Schmidt WP, Boisson S, Clasen T, Jenkins MW. Socio-cultural and behavioural factors constraining latrine adoption in rural coastal Odisha: An exploratory qualitative study Global health. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:1
  11. Routray P, Torondel B, Jenkins MW, Clasen T, Schmidt WP. Processes and challenges of community mobilisation for latrine promotion under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan in rural Odisha, India. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:1:1–15
  12. Saleem M, Burdett T, Heaslip V. Health and social impacts of open defecation on women: A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1
  13. Sari SYI, Setiadi AA, Sanjaya DK, Raksanagara AS. Community-Led Total Sanitation Program Attain to Increase Knowledge, Attitude and Intention but Fail to Change the Community’s Behavior; Case Study in Urban Slum Area in Bandung Municipality. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2019;248:1
  14. Zuin V, Delaire C, Peletz R, Cock-Esteb A, Khush R, Albert J. Policy Diffusion in the Rural Sanitation Sector: Lessons from Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS). World Development. 2019;124:104643

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.