BibTex Citation Data :
@article{JPHI29718, author = {Ni Putu Ayu Meylan Ardini and Made Wiswani Wacika and Kadek Agus Sudiarawan and Salwa Putri Hardiyan}, title = {Disability Rights Violation: Failure to Provide Reasonable Accommodation and Employment Discrimination Against the Colorblind in Indonesia}, journal = {Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia}, volume = {8}, number = {1}, year = {2026}, keywords = {Indirect Discrimination; Ishihara Test; Partial Color Blindness; Human Rights}, abstract = { The fundamental right to work in Indonesia is paradoxically undermined by pervasive no color blindness recruitments, often enforced via the Ishihara test. While this practice appears neutral, it constitutes indirect discrimination by disproportionately excluding competent individuals with partial colour blindness without any objective justification. This study aims to analyse the validity of the Ishihara test, arguing that it is a discriminatory tool that violates human rights. Using normative legal analysis and empirical case studies, the findings show that partial colour blindness is primarily a sensory limitation which rarely affects functional capabilities in most professions. Field data reveals a widespread misconception among employers that equates partial colour blindness with an inability to recognise hazards. Furthermore, many institutions enforce colour vision standards as an administrative hurdle without conducting job analyses relevant to the actual requirements of the role. The research concludes that the Ishihara test is widely misused as a definitive pass/fail determinant. This practice contravenes Law No. 13/2003 on Manpower regarding equal opportunity, and Law No. 8/2016 on Persons with Disabilities, which mandates the fulfilment of employment rights and reasonable adjustments. Automatic rejection without interactive dialogue constitutes a direct breach of legal obligations. This research advocates for an inclusive, fair, and dignified employment ecosystem in Indonesia. }, issn = {2656-3193}, doi = {10.14710/jphi.v8i1.%p}, url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/jphi/article/view/29718} }
Refworks Citation Data :
The fundamental right to work in Indonesia is paradoxically undermined by pervasive no color blindness recruitments, often enforced via the Ishihara test. While this practice appears neutral, it constitutes indirect discrimination by disproportionately excluding competent individuals with partial colour blindness without any objective justification. This study aims to analyse the validity of the Ishihara test, arguing that it is a discriminatory tool that violates human rights. Using normative legal analysis and empirical case studies, the findings show that partial colour blindness is primarily a sensory limitation which rarely affects functional capabilities in most professions. Field data reveals a widespread misconception among employers that equates partial colour blindness with an inability to recognise hazards. Furthermore, many institutions enforce colour vision standards as an administrative hurdle without conducting job analyses relevant to the actual requirements of the role. The research concludes that the Ishihara test is widely misused as a definitive pass/fail determinant. This practice contravenes Law No. 13/2003 on Manpower regarding equal opportunity, and Law No. 8/2016 on Persons with Disabilities, which mandates the fulfilment of employment rights and reasonable adjustments. Automatic rejection without interactive dialogue constitutes a direct breach of legal obligations. This research advocates for an inclusive, fair, and dignified employment ecosystem in Indonesia.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI) and Master Program of Law, Universitas Diponegoro as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia and Master Program of Law, Universitas Diponegoro and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles published in JPHI journal are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors.
<div style="display:none;"><p><a href="https://maissuprimentos.com/about-us/">barbartoto</a></p><p><a href="https://evelinacejuela.com/">barbartoto</a></p><p><a href="https://eystone.ng/about/">barbartoto</a></p><p><a href="https://polis.ulagos.cl/">slot 4d</a></p><p><a href="https://estagios.unifatecie.edu.br/">barbartoto</a></p><p><a href="https://www.bizy.com.ua/">barbartoto</a></p><p><a href="https://faciasweb.uncoma.edu.ar/">toto777</a></p><p><a href="https://revistanothofagus.ulagos.cl/">toto777</a></p><p><a href="https://maissuprimentos.com/contato/">barbartoto</a></p><p><a href="https://creuzaweb.uncoma.edu.ar/">slot dana</a></p></div>