DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v7i1.%25p

Optimization of Criminal Justice in Identifying Corruption Patterns in Government Administration and Development in Maluku

*Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa orcid  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pattimura, Indonesia
Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu orcid scopus  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pattimura, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
Maluku Province, with its archipelagic characteristics, experiences the impact of corruption in nearly all its regencies and cities, where government officials often collaborate with private entities in corrupt practices. This study aims to discuss the optimization of the criminal justice system in identifying corruption patterns in government administration and development in Maluku Province. The research employs an empirical approach. The findings reveal five distinct corruption patterns in government administration and development in Maluku Province, jointly perpetrated by regional government officials and private actors. These patterns include land price manipulation, contract price inflation, overpayments, tax fraud, and fictitious activities.The study concludes that optimizing the role of the criminal justice system in identifying corruption patterns requires strengthening the institutional capacity of the Indonesian National Police (Polri) in its duties as a recipient of reports, investigator, and examiner of corruption cases. Moving forward, a more intensive coordination among all state institutions involved in criminal justice is necessary to support the government in addressing the growing issue of corruption
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Institutional Strengthening; Criminal Justice; Corruption Patterns; Government; Development

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions as Communal Intellectual Property: Are They Protected Under the WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, and Associated Traditional Knowledge 2024? Structuring and Strengthening Village Resilience: A Legal Review of the Implementation of an Electronic-Based Village Governance System Policy on the Prevention and Handling of Sexual Violence in Higher Education Institutions More recent articles
  1. Adawiyah, Robiatul., & Rozah, Umi. (2020) Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System with Pancasila Perspective as an Open Justice System. Law Reform, Vol.16, (No.2), pp.149-162. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v16i2.33783
  2. Alviolita, Fifink Praiseda., & Arief, Barda Nawawi. (2019). Kebijakan Formulasi Tentang Perumusan Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Law Reform, Vol.15, (No.1),pp.130-148. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v15i1.23359
  3. Ariawan, I Gusti K. (2013). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Kertha Widya, Vol.1, (No.1),pp.21-30. https://doi.org/10.37637/ kw.v1i1.419
  4. Asyharuddin, Muhammad., Arfiani, Nur., & Herlina, Lita. (2022). Berkembangnya Budaya Korupsi di Tengah Masyarakat Melalui Kebiasaan Salam Tempel. Jurnal De Jure,Vol.14,(No.1),pp.1–20. https://doi. org/10.36277/jurnaldejure.v14i2.721
  5. Atmoko, Dwi., & Syauket, Amalia. (2022). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ditinjau dari Perspektif Dampak Serta Upaya Pemberantasan. Binamulia Hukum, Vol.11, (No.12), pp.177–191. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v11i2.732
  6. Bima, Muh Rinaldy., & Ramadani, Rizki. (2020). Position of Supervisory Board Organ and Its Implications for the Institutional Corruption Eradication Commission. Law Reform,Vol.16,(No.2),pp.179-197. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v16i2.33770
  7. Budiyono, Budiyono., Muhtadi., Muhtadi., & Firmansyah, Ade Arif. (2015). Dekonstruksi Urusan Pemerintahan Konkuren dalam Undang-Undang Pemerintahan Daerah. Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.17, (No.3), pp.419-432. https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/kanun/article/view/6077/5007
  8. Chandranegara, Ibnu Sina., Bakhri, Syaiful., & Umara, Nanda Sahputra. (2020). Optimalisasi Pembatasan Dana Kampanye Pemilihan Umum Kepala Daerah Sebagai Pencegahan Investasi Politik Yang Koruptif. Mimbar Hukum, Vol.32, (No.1), pp.30-54. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.475 12
  9. Danil, Elwi., & Kurniawan, Iwan. (2017). Optimizing Confiscation of Assets in Accelerating the Eradication of Corruption. Hasanudin Law Review, Vol.3, (No.1), pp.67-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.20956/halrev. v3i1.717
  10. Drani, Fuzi N. (2020). Penyelesaian Korupsi dengan menggunakan Restoratif Justice. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, Vol.20, (No.4),pp.605-617. http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.V20.605-617
  11. Efendi, A’an., Susanti, Dyah Ochtorina., & Suwardi, Suwardi. (2024). Kerugian Bisnis Persero: Business Judgment Rule Versus Delik Korupsi. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, Vol.6, (No.2), pp.193-209. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v6i2.193-209
  12. Fathya, Vita N. (2018). Upaya Reformasi Birokrasi melalui Area Perubahan Mental Aparatur untuk Memberantas Praktik Pungutan Liar yang dilakukan oleh PNS. Gosmogov; Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, Vol.4,(No.1),pp.38–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v4i1.14462
  13. Hiarie, Eddy O.S. (2020). Memahami ’Trading in Influence’ Dalam Kerangka UNCAC Sebagai Instrumen Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi,Vol.1,(No.1), pp.59-72. https://doi.org/10.51370/jhpk.v1i1.6
  14. Kadir, Yusrianto., & Moonti, Roy Marthen. (2018). Pencegahan Korupsi Dalam Pengelolaan Dana Desa. Jurnal UIS: Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan,Vol.6,(No.3),pp.430–442. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v6i3.583
  15. Kurniawan, Muhammad Rezza., & Pujiyono, Pujiyono. (2018). Modus Operandi Korupsi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah oleh PNS. Law Reform, Vol.14, (No.1), pp. 115-131. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v14i1.20241
  16. Lailam, Tanto., & Anggia, Putri. (2023). The Indonesian Constitutional Court Approaches the Proportionality Principle to the Cases Involving Competing Rights. Law Reform, Vol.19, (No.2), pp.110-127. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v19i1.54087
  17. Laksana, Agung Wara., Supriyono, Bambang., & Sarwono, Sarwono. (2015). Pelimpahan Wewenang Bupati Kepada Camat Dalam Penyelenggaraan Urusan Pemerintahan Daerah. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Vol.4,(No.3),pp.506-517. https://doi.org/10.33366/jisip.v4i3.134
  18. Manihuruk, Tri Novita S. (2021). Problematika Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dana Desa di Provinsi Riau. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, Vol.5, (No.2), pp.290-314. https://doi.org/10.25072/ jwy.v5i2.389
  19. Mispansyah, M. (2018). A Comparison Approach in Corruption Eradication: An Empirical Examination. Hasanudin Law Review, Vol.4,(No.2),pp.219-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.20956/ halrev.v4i2.1077
  20. Muhaimin, M. (2019). Restoratif Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, Vol.19, (No.2),pp.185–206. http://dx.doi.org/10. 30641/dejure.2019.V19.185-206
  21. Muin, F. (2015). Otonomi Daerah Dalam Persepektif Pembagian Urusan Pemerintah-Pemerintah Daerah Dan Keuangan Daerah. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.8, (No.1), pp.69-79. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v8no1.288
  22. Narindrani, F. (2020). Penyelesaian Korupsi Dengan Menggunakan Restoratif Justice. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, Vol.20, (No.4),pp.605–617. http://dx.doi.org/10.30 641/dejure.2020.V20.605-617
  23. Nugroho, Khrisna Lintang S. (2021). Criminal Law Policy of Justice Collaborator in Corruption Crime Case. Law Reform, Vol.17, (No.1), pp.24-35. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v17i1.37550
  24. Pardede, M. (2020). Aspek Hukum Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Korporasi Dalam Bidang Perpajakan. Jurnal De Jure, Vol.20, (No.3), pp.335-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020. V20.335-362
  25. Risnain, M. (2014). Kesinambungan Politik Hukum Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jurnal Rechtsvinding,Vol.3,(No.3),pp.311-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v3i3.28
  26. Saifuddin, B. (2017). Dampak Dan Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Warta, Vol.52, (No.2), pp.1–15. https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v0i52.259
  27. Santoso, Purwadi J. (2021). Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Penyalahgunaan Wewenang. Jurnal Juristic,Vol.2,(No.1),pp.40-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.35973/jrs.v2i01.2126
  28. Saragih,Yasmirah Mandasari., & Berlian, Berlian. (2018). The Enforcement Of The 2009 Law Number 46 On Corruption Court: The Role Of Special Corruption Court. Sriwijaya Law Review,Vol.2,(No.2),pp.193-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol2.Iss2.69.pp193-202
  29. Setiawan, Irfan., & Jesaja, Christin Pratami. (2022). Analisis Perilaku Korupsi Aparatur Pemerintah Di Indonesia (Studi pada Pengelolaan Bantuan Sosial Di Era Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Media Birokrasi, Vol.4,(No.2),pp.33-50. https://doi.org/10.33701/jmb.v4i2.2744
  30. Setiyono, B. (2017). Understanding corruption at local level post decentralization: Evidence from four case studies. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik,Vol.8,(No.1),pp.27–62. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.8.1.2017.27-62
  31. Soemanto, RB., Sudarto, Sudarto., & Sudarsana, Sudarsana. (2014). Pemahaman Masyarakat Terhadap Korupsi. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, Vol.3, (No.1), pp.80–88. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v3i1.101 24
  32. Suherry, S. (2017). Politik Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan,Vol.7,(No.1),pp.46–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v7i1.417
  33. Sulaiman, S. (2018). Paradigma dalam Penelitian Hukum. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.20, (No.2),pp.255-272. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v20i2.10076
  34. Suprihanto, Eko., Utama, Yos Johan., & Cahyaningtyas, Irma. (2023). Reformulasi Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia: Perspektif Kepolisian Menghadapi Korupsi Sebagai Ancaman Perang Proksi. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, Vol.5, (No.1),pp.204-219. https://doi.org/10.14710 /jphi.v5i1.204-219
  35. Yuherawan, Deni SB. (2014). Ketiadaan Fungsi Asas Legalitas Dalam Hukum Pidana Untuk Melindungi Kepentingan Korban. Arena Hukum, Vol.6, (No.1), pp.22–36. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub. arenahukum.2013.00601.2
  36. Soekanto, S. (2014). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia
  37. Kompas.com. (2019). Kasus Korupsi Beras, 95 ASN dan Aparat Desa di Tual Maluku Diperiksa Polisi. Retrieved from https://regional.kompas.com/read/2019/04/08/17430201/kasus-korupsi-beras-95-asn-dan-aparat-desa-di-tual-maluku-diperiksa-polisi
  38. Observation at District Police Kepulauan Aru, Dobo City and Tual District Prosecutor's Office, Maluku Province
  39. Observation at Financial and Development Supervisory Agency of Maluku Province

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.