DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v7i2.20-48

Aliran Filsafat Hukum Sebagai Cara Pandang (Worldview) Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Pidana

Legal Philosophy as a Judge's Worldview in Handing Down Criminal Verdicts

*Agam Ibnu Asa orcid  -  Program Doktor Filsafat Hukum, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Muhammad Mukhtasar Syamsuddin orcid scopus  -  Program Doktor Filsafat Hukum, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Agus Wahyudi orcid  -  Pusat Studi Pancasila, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Agus Hamzah  -  Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

The development of modern legal science requires a strong philosophical foundation to address the complexities of contemporary legal issues. The philosophy of law functions not only as a theoretical reflection but also as a fundamental basis for building legal theory and judicial practice. This study aims to examine the role of the philosophy of law in the development of legal science and theory, and how various schools of the philosophy of law, including Natural Law, Utilitarianism, the Historical School, Sociological Jurisprudence, Legal Realism, Critical Legal Studies (CLS), Feminist Legal Theory (FLT), Responsive Law, and Progressive Law, shape judges' worldviews in delivering criminal verdicts. This research uses a juridical-philosophical method with a conceptual and normative approach. The results show that the philosophy of law plays a central role in testing the validity, methodology, and truth within legal science. Moreover, the application of various legal thought schools enables judges to balance legal certainty with substantive justice, while considering social dynamics and the moral values of society. This study concludes that the philosophy of law is not only a theoretical framework but also serves as an integral worldview for judges in enforcing law that is just and responsive to social changes.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Philosophy of Law; Legal Theory; Judges' Worldview; Criminal Verdicts; Substantive Justice
Funding: Universitas Gadjah Mada

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Legal Philosophy as a Judge's Worldview in Handing Down Criminal Verdicts Legal Reconstruction of Environmental Protection and Human Rights in the Context of Climate Resilience Formulation Policy and Prospective Law Enforcement of Medical Personnel/Health Personnel Negligence Acts (Dynamics of Criminal Responsibility in Medical Malpractice) More recent articles
  1. Adawiyah, Robiatul., & Rozah, Umi. (2020). Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System with Pancasila Perspective as an Open Justice System. Law Reform, Vol.16, (No.2), pp.149-162. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v16i2.33783
  2. Adygezalova, Gyulnaz E. (2018). Sociological Jurisprudence and Legal Realism as a Basis for the Development of Judicial Law-Making. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics,Vol.9,(No.5), pp.1528-1533. https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v9.5(35).02
  3. Al Arif, Muhammad Yasin. (2019). Penegakan Hukum dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, Vol.2, (No.1), pp.169-172. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.2.1.169-192
  4. Ali, Mahrus. (2017). Pemetaan Tesis Dalam Aliran-Aliran Filsafat Hukum dan Konsekuensi Metodologisnya. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, Vol.24, (No.2), pp.213-31. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss2.art
  5. Asa, Agam Ibnu., Munir, Misnal., & Ningsih, Siti Murti. (2021). Nonet and Selznick’s Responsive Law Concept in A Historical Philosophy Perspective. Crepido, Vol.3, (No.2),pp.96–109. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.3.2.96-109
  6. Aswandi, Bobi., & Roisah, Kholis. (2019). Negara Hukum Dan Demokrasi Pancasila Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM). Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia,Vol.1,(No.1),pp.128–145. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i1.128-145
  7. Aulia, Muhammad Z. (2018). Hukum Progresif dari Satjipto Rahardjo. Undang: Jurnal Hukum,Vol.1,(No.1),pp.159–185. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.1.159-185
  8. Aulia, Muhammad Z. (2020). Friedrich Carl von Savigny Tentang Hukum: Hukum Sebagai Manifestasi Jiwa Bangsa. Undang: Jurnal Hukum,Vol.3,(No.1),pp.201–236. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.3.1.201-236
  9. Boyle, J. (1985). A Symposium of Critical Legal Studies: Introduction. American University Law Review, Vol.34,(No.4),pp. 927–928. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3084980
  10. Calil, Mário Lúcio Garcez., & Markma, Debora (2020). Law, Race and Gender: Elements for The Construction of A Feminist Legal Theory Suitable to Black Feminism. Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas, Vol.10,(No.2),pp.1–20. https://doi.org/10.5102/RBPP.V10I2.6797
  11. Crowe, J. (2016). Natural Law Theories. Philosophical Compass, Vol.11, (No.2), pp. 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12315
  12. Dabrowska, A. (2021). The Importance of The Philosophy of Law in Judicial Decision – Considerations Based On The Philosophy Of Gustav Radbruch. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica, Vol.97, (No.1), pp.183–198. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.97.11
  13. Dagan, H. (2018). The Real Legacy of American Legal Realism. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies,Vol.38,(No.1),pp.1–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqy001
  14. Daher, Hafiz Z. (2018). Utilitarianism theory according to Bentham and Stuart Mill. International Journal for Empirical Education and Research, Vol.2, (No.5), pp.32–40. https://doi.org/10.35935/edr/25.2617
  15. Dyrda, A. (2018). Legal Realism and Legal Positivism. Avant, Vol.9, (No.1), pp.47-66. https://doi.org/10.26913/90102018.0103.0004
  16. Ehrenberg, Kenneth M. (2016). Natural Law. The Functions of Law, Vol.1, (No.1),pp.47-66. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677474.003.0004
  17. Faisal, A. (2023). Pemikiran Hukum Progresif Prof. Dr. Satjipto Rahardjo. Journal of Cross Knowledge, Vol.1, (No.2), pp.314-328. https://edujavare.com/index.php/IJCK/article/view/172
  18. Finnis, J. (2014). What is the Philosophy of Law?. The American Journal of Jurisprudence, Vol.59,(No.2),pp.133-142. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/auu012
  19. Guastini, R. (2020). Legal Realism as a Positivistic Theory of Law. Isonomia, (No.53),pp.127-137. https://doi.org/10.5347/isonomia.v0i53.452
  20. Herlambang, P. (2019). Positivisme dan Implikasinya Terhadap Ilmu dan Penegakan Hukum. Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev), Vol.2, (No.1), pp.336-342. https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v2i1.36187
  21. Hibbs, Thomas S. (2023). Aquinas and Black Natural Law. Nova et Vetera, Vol.21, (No.3),pp.943–970. https://dx.doi.org/10. 1353/nov.2023.a919232
  22. Hutajulu, Marihot Janpieter. (2015). Filsafat Hukum dalam Putusan Pengadilan/Hakim. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.9, (No.1),pp.91–100. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2015.v9.i1.p91-100
  23. Jaquet, F. (2018). Evolution and Utilitarianism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol.21, (No.5),pp.1151-1161. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45116534
  24. Julyano, Mario., & Sulistyawan, Aditya Yuli. (2019). Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum. Jurnal Crepido, Vol.1, (No.1), pp.13–22. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.1.1.13-22
  25. Juzaszek, M. (2023). Durkheimian Utilitarianism and Legal Moralism. Revus, Vol.49, (No.1), pp.1–1. https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.8652
  26. Kennedy, D. (2021). The Critique of Rights in Critical Legal Studies. In Left Legalism/Left Critique,Vol.1,(No.1),pp.178-228. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11hpn4c.9
  27. Latipulhayat, A. (2015). Khazanah: Friedrich Karl von Savigny. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum,Vol.2,(No.1),pp.197–208. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v2n1.a12
  28. Luthfi, R. (2022). Ilmu Hukum Disiplin Ilmu yang Bersifat Sui Generis. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, Vol.6, (No.2), pp.14618–14623. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v6i2.4740
  29. Maruf, Syochibul Amar., & Harefa, Safaruddin. (2023). Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Wijaya Putra Law Review,Vol.2,(No.2),pp.204–219. https://doi.org/10.38156/wplr.v2i2.140
  30. Maryati. (2014). Kritik Terhadap Paradigma Positivisme Hukum Dan Beberapa Pemikiran Dalam Rangka Membangun Paradigma Hukum Yang Berkeadilan. Inovatif: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.7, (No.2), pp.76–88. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id /jimih/login
  31. Mukhidin. (2014). Hukum Progresif Sebagai Solusi Hukum Yang Mensejahterahkan Rakyat. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Vol.1,(No.3),pp.267–286. https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/PH/article/view/1488
  32. Musmuliadin, Musmuliadin., Indarti, Erlyn., & Rochaeti, Nur. (2024). Revolutionizing Justice: Law Enforcement Through The Lens of Progressive Law. Indonesia Law Review,Vol.14,(No.3). https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v14n3.3
  33. Pandit, S. (2023). Historical School of Jurisprudence: An Intriguing Province. International Journal of Law Management & Humanities, Vol.1, (No.1), pp.712–722. https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.114111
  34. Pranata, Robert., Indarti, Erlyn., & Indraswari, Tri Laksmi. (2016). Penemuan Hukum dan Paradigma: Suatu Telaah Filsafat Hukum tentang Proses Peradilan Pidana di Pengadilan Negeri Kota Semarang. Diponegoro Law Journal, Vol.5, (No.4), pp.1–20. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/15755
  35. Purwanti, Ani., & Wekke, Ismail Suardi. (2018). Scholten’s Open System and Rahardjo’s Progressive of Law: Law Making and Implementation. Opcion, Vol.34, Special Issue16,pp.846-857. https://www.produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/opcion/issue/view/2712
  36. Ramadhan, C. (2018). Konvergensi Civil Law dan Common Law di Indonesia dalam Penemuan dan Pembentukan Hukum. Mimbar Hukum, Vol.30, (No.2), pp.213–229. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.31169
  37. Salojärvi, Juhana M. (2019). A Counter-Culture of Law: Jurisprudential Change and the Intellectual Origins of the Critical Legal Studies Movement. American Journal of Legal History,Vol.59,(No.4),pp.409–443. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajlh/njz022
  38. Samekto, FX. Adji. (2017). Tantangan Hakim di Indonesia: Dari Penjaga Kepastian Hukum Menuju Pencipta Keadilan Berdasarkan Pancasila. Jurnal Ketatanegaraan, Vol.4, (No.3),pp.69–91. https://mpr.go.id/pengkajian/Jurnal_KK.pdf
  39. Siregar, Praise Juinta W.S. (2022). Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Civil Law dan Common Law dalam Penerapan Yurisprudensi Ditinjau dari Politik Hukum. Dharmasisya: Jurnal Program Magister Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Vol.2, (No.37), pp.1027–1036. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/dharmasisya/vol2/iss2/37
  40. Sistyawan, Dwanda Julisa., Saraswati, Retno., A.L.W, Lita Tyesta., Jayawibawa, Marcellus., & Aris, Mohammad Syaiful. (2024). The Development of Positivism's Legal Theory: From Bentham to Hart. Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah,Vol.9,(No.2),pp.777-801. http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/petita.v9i1.402
  41. Saraswati, R. (2009). Calon Perseorangan dalam Pilkada Suatu Tinjauan Filosofis. Jurnal Konstitusi PPK-FH Universitas Brawijaya, Vol.2,(No.1),pp.75–93. https://www.mkri.id/public/content/infoumum/ejurnal/pdf/ejurnal_Jurnal%20Konstitusi%20UNIBRAW%20Vol%202%20no%201.pdf
  42. Sulaiman, Sulaiman., & Nasir, Muhammad. (2023). Hukum Responsif: Hukum sebagai Institusi Sosial Melayani Kebutuhan Sosial dalam Masa Transisi. Jurnal Ius Civile, Vol.7,(No.1),pp.94–103. https://doi.org/10.35308/jic.v7i1.7570
  43. Sulistyawan, Aditya Y. (2018). Feminist Legal Theory dalam Telaah Paradigma: Suatu Pemetaan Filsafat Hukum. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, Vol.47,(No.1),pp.56–62. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.47.1.2018.56-62
  44. Stewart, James G. (2020). CLS is Haunted! A Perspective on Contemporary Critical Legal Studies. Law and Literature, Vol.32, (No.1),pp.135-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/1535685X.2019.1635358
  45. Tanjung, Ahmad Kodir Jailani., Purwadi, Hari., & Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih. (2019). Paradigma Hakim dalam Memutuskan Perkara Pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Pasca Sarjana Hukum UNS, Vol.7, (No.1),pp.39–51. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v7i1.29178
  46. Tamanaha, Brian Z. (2020). Sociological Jurisprudence Past and Present. Law and Social Inquiry, Vol.45, (No.2), pp.563–589. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2019.26
  47. Thekno, Felix., Wijaya, Niko., & Rasji, Rasji. (2023). Kontribusi Hukum Alam Sebagai Salah Satu Pendekatan Filsafat Hukum dalam Pemikiran Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Multilingual,Vol.3,(No.4),pp.176–190. https://ejournal.penerbitjurnal.com/index.php/multilingual/article/view/540/468
  48. Varaba, Dinebari D., & Barebon, Charles N. (2022). The Philosophy of Law of Immanuel Kant. Tamaddun, Vol.20, (No.2), pp.166–180. https://doi.org/10.33096/ tamaddun.v20i2.166
  49. Widyawati, Anis., Pujiyono, Pujiyono., Rochaeti, Nur. (2021). Elimination of Sexual Violence in Feminist Legal Theorist. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, Vol.6, (No.2), pp.202–215. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v6i2.48346
  50. Wijaya, Ida Made O. (2022). Restorative Justice dalam Tinjauan Hukum Progresif: Eksistensi dan Implikasi. Indonesia Berdaya,Vol.3,(No.3),pp.297. https://doi.org/10.47679/ib.2022297
  51. Yanez, Miguel G. (2016). In Search of Ethics in the Hermeneutic Philosophy of Law. Bajo Palabra: Journal of Philosophy, Vol.12, pp.101–111. https://doi.org/10.15366/bp2016.12.008
  52. Asa, Agam I. (2020). Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Mewujudkan Keadilan Substansial dalam Perspektif Hukum Responsif Philippe Nonet dan Philip Selznick (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 45/PHPU.D-VIII/2010). Tesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada
  53. Hartoyo, E. (2022). Penegakan Hukum dalam Putusan Hakim pada Perkara Pidana yang Berkeadilan Berbasis Hukum Progresif. Tesis, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung
  54. Budijono. (2015). Hukum Progresif Satjipto Rahardjo dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum: Relevansinya dengan Penyelesaian Kasus Korupsi Griya Lawu Asri (GLA) di Karanganyar. Disertasi, Universitas Gadjah Mada
  55. Erwin, M. (2018). Filsafat Hukum: Refleksi Kritis Terhadap Hukum dan Hukum Indonesia (dalam Dimensi Ide dan Aplikasi). Depok: Raja Wali Pers
  56. Isharyanto. (2016). Teori Hukum, Suatu Pengantar dan Pendekatan Tematik. Yogyakarta: Penerbit WR
  57. Mochtar, Zainal Arifin., & Hiariej, Eddy Omar Sharif. (2024). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum: Memahami Kaidah, Teori, Asas Dan Filsafat Hukum. Depok: Rajawali Pers
  58. Nonet, Philippe., & Selznick, Philip. (2017). Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. London: Routledge
  59. Prasetyo, Teguh., & Barkatullah, Abdul Halim. (2016). Filsafat, Teori, dan Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo
  60. Supandriyo. (2019). Asas Kebebasan Hakim dalam Penjatuhan Pidana di Indonesia: Kajian Komprehensif terhadap Tindak Pidana dengan Ancaman Minimum Khusus. Yogyakarta: Arti Bumi Intaran
  61. Suteki, Suteki., & Taufani, Galang. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Filsafat Teori dan Praktik). Depok: Rajawali Pers
  62. Tahir, Rusdin., Astawa, I Gde Pantja., Widjajanto, Agus., Panggabean, Mompang L., Rohman, Moh. Mujibur., Dewi, Ni Putu Paramita., Deliarnoor, Nandang Alamsah., Abas, Muhamad., Ayu, Rizqa Febry., Meinarni, Ni Putu Suci., HS, Fatimah., Sumartini, Ni Wayan Eka., Sugiharti, Dewi Kania., & Paminto, Saptaning Ruju. (2023). Metodologi Penelitian Bidang Hukum: Suatu Pendekatan Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia
  63. West, C. (2021). Critical Legal Studies and a Liberal Critic. In Keeping Faith (pp. 320–335). London: Routlegde
  64. Joni. (2024). Budaya Hukum Profesi Hakim dalam Memutuskan Perkara yang Berkeadilan. Retrieved from https://jdih.mahkamah agung.go.id/legal-product/budaya-hukum-profesi-hakim-dalam-memutuskan-perkara-yang-berkeadilan/detail
  65. Miller Jr, Douglas J. (2015). Aristotle’s Philosophy of Law. In A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence, edited by F. D. Miller & C. Biondi, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 79–110. Dordrecht: Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-017-9885-3_4

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.