skip to main content

Comparison of Image Quality Between Virtual Grid And Physical Grid At A Ratio of 10:1 Using Digital Radiography (DR)

*Muhammad Irsal orcid scopus  -  Department of Imaging Diagnostic and Radiotherapy, Poltekkes Kemenkes Jakarta II, Jl. Hang Jebat III Blok F3, RT.4/RW.8, Gunung, Kec. Kby. Baru, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Jakarta, Indonesia 12120., Indonesia
Shinta Gunawati Sutoro orcid  -  Department of Imaging Diagnostic and Radiotherapy, Poltekkes Kemenkes Jakarta II, Jl. Hang Jebat III Blok F3, RT.4/RW.8, Gunung, Kec. Kby. Baru, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Jakarta, Indonesia 12120., Indonesia
Rafhael Reznandika Yustiyo  -  Department of Imaging Diagnostic and Radiotherapy, Poltekkes Kemenkes Jakarta II, Jl. Hang Jebat III Blok F3, RT.4/RW.8, Gunung, Kec. Kby. Baru, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Jakarta, Indonesia 12120., Indonesia
Received: 23 Oct 2025; Revised: 12 May 2026; Accepted: 16 May 2026; Available online: 30 May 2026; Published: 30 May 2026.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Virtual Grid (VG) in radiology is still rarely used since this technology is still new and literature information is scarce. The objective of this study is to evaluate image quality between virtual grid (VG) and physical grid at a grid ratio of 10:1 using digital radiography (DR). This study employed a descriptive analytical method conducted between June and July 2025 at the Physics and Radiography Laboratory of the Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, Poltekkes Jakarta II. The equipment used included an X-ray multipurpose, a DR imaging system equipped with a VG at a ratio of 10:1, a physical grid at a ratio of 10:1, Radiant DICOM Viewer software, and a stepwedge. The research preparation involved testing the X-ray machine and DR modalities, followed by exposure at varying tube voltages of 60 kVp, 70 kVp, 80 kVp, and 90 kVp, with three variations in tube current-time: 10 mAs, 16 mAs, and 20 mAs. The obtained images were analyzed using the Radiant DICOM Viewer to assess image quality based on the measured signal difference to noise ratio (SDNR) and figure of merit (FOM). The result identical graphical patterns observed with increases in tube voltage and tube current-time indicate that the VG ratio of 10:1 tends to show improved SDNR and FOM values compared to the physical grid ratio of 10:1 and non-grid configurations. The image quality of the VG with a 10:1 ratio outperforms both the physical grid and non-grid configurations in DR imaging

Keywords: Virtual Grid; Physical grid; Signal different to noise ratio (SDNR): Figure of merit (FOM)

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
  1. ​M. Sayed, K. M. Knapp, J. Fulford, C. Heales, and S. J. Alqahtani, “The principles and effectiveness of X-ray scatter correction software for diagnostic X-ray imaging: A scoping review,” Eur. J. Radiol., vol. 158, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110600
  2. ​T. Porubszky, “Anti-scatter grids, applied in diagnostic radiology,” Proceedings of European Medical Physics and Engineering Conference, pp. 198–204, 2012, Accessed: Jul. 18, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://inis.iaea.org/records/d2phz-gay30
  3. ​D. W. Anderson, “Introduction of grids to mobile ICU radiography in a teaching hospital,” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 79, no. 940, pp. 315–318, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1259/BJR/66912494,
  4. ​T. Gossye, P. V. Smeets, E. Achten, and K. Bacher, “Impact of Software Parameter Settings on Image Quality of Virtual Grid Processed Radiography Images: A Contrast-Detail Phantom Study,” Invest. Radiol., vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 374–380, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000646,
  5. ​H. Kawashima et al., “Radiation dose considerations in digital radiography with an anti-scatter grid: A study using adult and pediatric phantoms,” J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys., vol. 24, no. 9, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1002/ACM2.14081,
  6. ​Wayne Forrest, “Antiscatter grids may not be helpful in some DR applications | AuntMinnieEurope,” AuntMinnie.com. Accessed: Jul. 18, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.auntminnieeurope.com/clinical-news/article/15642212/antiscatter-grids-may-not-be-helpful-in-some-dr-applications
  7. ​L. Court and T. Yamazaki, “Technical note: A comparison of antiscatter grids for digital radiography,” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 77, no. 923, pp. 950–952, Nov. 2004, doi: 10.1259/BJR/21117919,
  8. ​T. M. Bernhardt, U. Rapp-Bernhardt, T. Hausmann, G. Reichel, U. W. Krause, and W. Doehring, “Digital selenium radiography: Anti-scatter grid for chest radiography in a clinical study,” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 73, no. 873, pp. 963–968, 2000, doi: 10.1259/BJR.73.873.11064649,
  9. ​T. Lehnert et al., “Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: Impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures,” Invest. Radiol., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2014, doi: 10.1097/RLI.0B013E3182A56654,
  10. ​A. J. Abdi, H. Precht, C. B. Outzen, and J. Jensen, “Quantitative Evaluation of Image Quality and Radiation Dose Using Novel Intelligent Noise Reduction (INR) Software in Chest Radiography: A Phantom Study,” Diagnostics 2025, Vol. 15, Page 1391, vol. 15, no. 11, p. 1391, May 2025, doi: 10.3390/DIAGNOSTICS15111391
  11. ​Wayne Forrest, “Virtual antiscatter grid improves chest x-ray images | AuntMinnie,” AuntMinnie.com. Accessed: Jul. 18, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.auntminnie.com/resources/conference/rsna/article/15621735/virtual-antiscatter-grid-improves-chest-x-ray-images
  12. ​C. S. Moore et al., “Investigating the use of an antiscatter grid in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system,” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 88, no. 1047, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1259/BJR.20140613,
  13. ​H. Kunitomo and K. Ichikawa, “Signal-to-noise ratio improvements using anti-scatter grids with different object thicknesses and tube voltages,” Phys. Med., vol. 73, pp. 105–110, May 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.EJMP.2020.04.014
  14. ​Ika Hariyati, Lukmanda Evan Lubis, Djarwani Soeharso Soejoko, Supriyanto Ardjo Pawiro, and Indah Lestariningsih, “The optimization of image acquisition on direct-digital radiography system using in-house phantom,” Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 2019. Accessed: Dec. 12, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20481866&lokasi=lokal
  15. ​Takahiro KAWAMURA, Satoshi NAITO, Kayo OKANO, and Masahiko YAMADA, “Improvement in Image Quality and Workflow of X-Ray Examinations using a New Image Processing Method, ‘Virtual Grid Technology,’” Fujifilm Research & Development (No.60-2015). Accessed: Jul. 19, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://asset.fujifilm.com/www/jp/files/2019-12/af33379bc12c07f84a63f59ebdeef431/ff_rd060_004_en.pdf
  16. ​T. Gossye et al., “Evaluation of Virtual Grid Processed Clinical Chest Radiographs,” Invest. Radiol., vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 585–591, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000876,
  17. ​T. Gossye et al., “Evaluation of Virtual Grid processed clinical pelvic radiographs,” J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys., vol. 25, no. 6, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1002/ACM2.14353,
  18. ​H. Precht et al., “Can Scatter Correction Software Replace A Grid In Dr Pelvic Examinations?,” Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry, vol. 187, no. 1, pp. 8–16, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1093/RPD/NCZ129,
  19. ​B. Ween, M. Olstad, J. Å. Jakobsen, and D. R. Olsen, “Pediatric digital chest radiography, comparison of grid versus non-grid techniques,” European Journal of Radiography, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 201–206, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1016/J.EJRADI.2010.09.002
  20. ​Hyun-Jin Yang and ong-Kyoon Han, “A Study on the Usefulness of VGR (Virtual Grid Role) Algorithm for Elevation of Image Quality in DR System,” J. Korean Soc. Radio, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 763–772, 2020, Accessed: Jul. 19, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.koreascience.kr/article/JAKO202035066033779.pdf
  21. ​D. W. Anderson, “Introduction of grids to mobile ICU radiography in a teaching hospital,” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 79, no. 940, pp. 315–318, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1259/BJR/66912494,
  22. ​H. Precht et al., “Can Scatter Correction Software Replace A Grid In Dr Pelvic Examinations?,” Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry, 2019, doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncz129
  23. ​S. Fritz and A. K. Jones, “Guidelines for anti-scatter grid use in pediatric digital radiography,” Pediatr. Radiol., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 313–321, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1007/S00247-013-2824-9,
  24. ​M. Mizuta et al., “Comparison of anti-scatter grids for digital imaging with use of a direct-conversion flat-panel detector,” Radiol. Phys. Technol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 46–52, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1007/S12194-011-0134-1,
  25. ​I. Šabič, D. Ključevšek, M. Thaler, and D. Žontar, “The effect of anti-scatter grid on radiation dose in chest radiography in children,” Central European Journal of Paediatrics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 75–80, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.5457/p2005-114.138

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.