skip to main content

Verification of Co-60 Source in Brachytherapy Equipment Using TW33005 Well-Type Chamber

*Junita Hemelia orcid  -  Medical Physics, Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia
Pratiwi Sri Wardani  -  Medical Physics, Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia
Sahara Hamas Intifadhah  -  Material Physics, Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia
Ahmad Zarkasi  -  Electronics and Instrumentation, Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia
Devina Rayzy Perwitasari Sutaji Putri  -  Medical Physics, Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia
Received: 5 Aug 2024; Revised: 15 Nov 2024; Accepted: 19 Nov 2024; Published: 30 Nov 2024.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Accidents in brachytherapy have occurred and are documented by the IAEA. These incidents are attributed to various factors, such as inaccurate sources, lack of independent verification, and equipment failures due to inadequate calibration. Verifying radioactive sources is crucial for ensuring patient safety. Verification is conducted to confirm that the measured source activity is accurate and stable. Accuracy and stability of source activity are two essential parameters in verification. Source activity accuracy indicates how closely the measured source activity aligns with the reference source activity, while source activity stability reflects the well-type chamber's ability to produce consistent results over time. This study aimed to verify the Co-60 sources at Dr. Kanujoso Djatiwibowo General Hospital using a TW33005 well-type chamber and analyze the results against national and international standards. The results showed that the Co-60 source activity values remained accurate and stable over five months. The highest accuracy was observed in November 2023 (-2.011%), while the lowest was in October 2023 (-2.397%). The highest stability was recorded in September 2023 (-0.416%), and the lowest in October 2023 (-2.090%). In conclusion, the Co-60 sources at Dr. Kanujoso Djatiwibowo General Hospital met the accuracy standards set by ESTRO and BAPETEN of 3% to 5% and the stability standard set by the IAEA of ±3%. This indicates that the sources are safe for use in brachytherapy.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Accuracy; Brachtherapy; Stability; Well-Type Chamber

Article Metrics:

  1. E. D. Martadiani, P. P. Y. S. Anandasari, & D. G. Maiswara, "Buku Panduan Belajar Dokter Muda: Radiologi" Penerbit Lontar Mediatama, Yogyakarta, (2020)
  2. I. Shobari, P. I. Masbatin, M. H. Amin, & Triyanto, "Perekayasaan Modul Kontrol Pemindai 1D Untuk Kalibrasi Perangkat Brakhiterapi" Prima, 17(2), 2–12, (2020)
  3. A. Zubaidah & Ruslan, "Nuclear Smart Book" Batan Press, Jakarta, (2016)
  4. Z. Abidin, "Nuclear and its Applications" BRIN Nuclear Polytechnic, Yogyakarta, (2022)
  5. A. Wen, X. Wang, B. Wang, C. Yan, J. Luo, P. Wang, & J. Li, "Comparative Analysis of 60Co and 192Ir Sources in High Dose Rate Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer" Cancers, 14(19), 1–16, (2022)
  6. I. M. Sukarna, "Radiochemistry: Discovery of Radioactivity and Nuclear Stability" Open University, Jakarta, (2014)
  7. R. Fardela, R. Analia, A. Maulida, R. S. Ramda, F. Diyona, & D. Mardiansyah, "Verification of HDR Ir-192 Brachytherapy Source Using a Well Type Chamber Ionization Detector at Andalas University Hospital" Scientific Journal of Physics FMIPA Lambung Mangkurat University, 20(2), 2541–1713, (2023)
  8. IAEA, "IAEA-TECDOC-1274 Calibration of Photon and Beta Ray Sources Used in Brachytherapy" IAEA, Austria, (2002)
  9. K. P. Adhikari, A. Shah, B. Achraya, A. Karn, & S. Chapagain, "Acceptance Testing, Commissioning And Quality Assurance For A Nucletron 192Ir HDR Brachytherapy Afterloader At Nams, Bir Hospital" Scientific World, 12(12), 85-88, (2019)
  10. A. Rohmat, G. Maslebu, A. Setiawan, Muhtarom, & M. I. M. Arrozaqi, "Dose Rate Analysis of HDR Cobalt (Co-60) Afterloading Brachytherapy Unit Using Well Type Chamber Measurement Method" Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology, 12(3), 5354-5361, (2020)
  11. Riyanto, "Validation and Verification of test methods" Deepublish, Yogyakarta, (2016)
  12. D. L. Bailey, J. L. Humm, A. Todd-Pokropek, & A. V. Aswegen, "Nuclear medicine Physics: A Handbook for Teachers and Students" IAEA, Austria, (2014)
  13. M. Aziz, E. Hidayanto, & D. D. Lestari, "Determination of 60Co and 137Cs Activity in Unknown Samples Using an HPGe Detector" Youngster Physics Journal, 4(2), 189–196, (2015)
  14. D. T. Genç, L. Poyraz, B. Kovan, & C. Türkmen, "Quality control tests of dose calibrators used in nuclear medicine" Demiroğlu Bilim University Florence Nightingale Journal of Medicine, 5(1), 8–14, (2019)
  15. IAEA, "IAEA-TECDOC-1079 Calibration of Brachytherapy Source" IAEA, Austria, (1999)
  16. A. F. Firmansyah, O. A. Firmansyah, S. I. Sunaryati, & N. Rajagukguk, "Evaluation of Well-Type Chamber Calibration Factor for Measurement of Ir-192 Brachytherapy Source Over 10 Institutions" Jurnal Fisika dan Aplikasinya, 16(2), 95, (2020)
  17. BAPETEN, "Radiotherapy Licensing Handbook" BAPETEN, Jakarta, (2019)
  18. J. Venselaar, & J. Pérez-Calatayud, "A Practical Guide to Quality Control of Brachytherapy Equipment: ESTRO Booklet No. 8" ESTRO, Brussels, (2004)
  19. S. Polgar & S. A. Thomas, "Introduction to Research in the Health Sciences" Churchill Livingstone/Harcourt Publishers Ltd., London, (2000)
  20. S. M. Brookhart & A. J. Nitko, A. J, “Educational assessment of students” Pearson, London, (2018)
  21. C. M. Karaca, D. T. Genç, H. Kovan, M. Mulazımoğlu, & B. Demir, “Comparative Assesment of Dose Calibrators Used in Nuclear Medicine” Middle East Journal of Science, 6(2), 44–56, (2020)

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

slot gacor slot