skip to main content

ASEAN- Australia Trade Relations by Stages of Processing: Comparative Research

*Phuong Ha Nguyen  -  Institue for Southeast Asian Studies, Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences, Viet Nam
Long Mong Hoang  -  Ho Chi Minh City University of Foreign Languages and Information Technology, Viet Nam
Dung Duy Nguyen  -  Institue for Southeast Asian Studies, Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences, Viet Nam

Citation Format:
Abstract

ASEAN and Australia became the dialogue partner in 1974. Over 46 years of cooperation and development, ASEAN- Australia relations have achieved many good results, especially in recent years when two sides participate in several free trade agreements (FTAs) at bilateral levels and multilateral levels. In 2014, Australia and ASEAN formally became strategic partners, recognizing the importance of the relationship in building mutual benefits. Participation in FTAs and relationship upgrading has helped bilateral trade growth. In 2018-2019, Australia was the seventh-largest trading partner of ASEAN and ASEAN was one of Australia's top three trading partner, however, the two sides face many challenges such as the difficulties after the global crisis since 2009, the "spaghetti bowl" phenomenon of joining many agreements at the same time. Thus, to solve these problems, the production and exporting of comparative advantage goods by the stages of processing to participate in an ideal regional supply chain are very important. Based on the comparative theory and supply chain perspectives The paper compared revealed comparative advantage indexes of ASEAN countries and Australia from 2009 through 2018 to find which country in ASEAN is Australia's suitable partner from which provided the ideal effective supply chain distribution. After that, through trade value comparison, the paper examed if ASEAN countries and Australia specialized in production by stages of processing. From the results, appropriate recommendations were provided to enhance the trade relations between ASEAN and Australia.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Comparative Research; Stages of Processing; Trade Relations

Article Metrics:

  1. bugattas, Luis. 2004. “Swimming in the Spaghetti Bowl: Challenges for Developing Countries under the ‘New Regionalism’.” Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1280188 or
  2. ASEAN secretariat, ASEAN Trade Database Preliminary Figures as of 13 May 2019
  3. ASEAN Secretariat. 2012. A Guide for ASEAN Business - ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand Free Trade Area. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat. https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/4936391?from=list
  4. Balassa, Bela. 1965. “Trade liberalisation and “revealed” comparative advantage 1.” The Manchester School 33, no. 2: 99-123
  5. Baldwin, Richard. 2011. “Trade and industrialisation after globalisation’s 2nd unbundling: How building and joining a supply chain are different and why it matters. Nber Working Paper Series. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w17716/w17716.pdf
  6. Banton, Caroline. 2020. “Raw Materials.” Accessed, November 30, 2020
  7. Bhagwati, Jagdish N. 1995. “US trade policy: The infatuation with FTAs.”
  8. Bruhn, Dominique. 2014. “Global value chains and deep preferential trade agreements: promoting trade at the cost of domestic policy autonomy?” Available at SSRN 2464136
  9. Cook, Malcolm. 2018. “ASEAN–Australia relations: The suitable status quo.” Accessed March 30, 2020. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/asean-australia-relations-suitable-status-quo
  10. Database from: https://wits.worldbank.org/
  11. Database from: https://www.trademap.org/
  12. Dobell, Graeme. 2018. “ASEAN and Australia go to the summit.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 72, no. 4: 314-321
  13. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/rawmaterials.asp#:~:text=Raw%20materials%20are%20materials%20or,sold%20on%20commodities%20exchanges%20worldwide
  14. Huệ, Trương Thị Minh. 2016. “Hồ sơ thị trường Ôxtrâylia”. https://vcosa.vn/Uploads/origin/HSTT-Oxtraylia-2016cap-nhat-T4-2016_oc_(1)-20190603110858851.pdf
  15. Kenton, Will. 2020. “Intermediate good.” Accessed November 30, 2020. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/intermediate-good.asp#:~:text=An%20intermediate%20good%20is%20a,to%20manufacture%20other%20food%20products
  16. Krugman, Paul R, and Maurice Obstfeld. 2011. International Economics: Theory & Policy, Global Edition. Pearson Education: 9th edition
  17. New Zealand’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. 2020. The Agreement Establishing the ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand Free Trade Area. Wellington 5045, New Zealand
  18. Okabe, Misa. 2015. “Impact of free trade agreements on trade in East Asia.” ERIA Discussion Paper Series 1: 48
  19. Okamoto, Jiro. 2014. “Australia’s Economic Relations with ASEAN: Learning to Deal with the Evolving Organization.” In The Australia-ASEAN Dialogue, edited by Wood S.P., He B., 127-143. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  20. Plummer, Michael G., David Cheong, and Shintaro Hamanaka. 2011. Methodology for impact assessment of free trade agreements. Asian Development Bank
  21. Tuovila, Alicia. 2020. “Capital Goods.” Accessed November 30, 2020. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/capitalgoods.asp#:~:text=Capital%20goods%20are%20physical%20assets,used%20to%20make%20finished%20goods
  22. Worldbank. 2020. “Product Group.” https://wits.worldbank.org/Product-Metadata.aspx?lang=en

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.