Slave Trade Syndicates: Contestation of Slavery in Timor between Local Rulers, Europeans, and Pirates in the 19th century

*Fanada Sholihah  -  Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Yety Rochwulaningsih scopus  -  Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Singgih Tri Sulistiyono scopus  -  Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Received: 26 Jun 2019; Revised: 15 Jul 2019; Accepted: 16 Jul 2019; Published: 16 Jul 2019; Available online: 16 Jul 2019.
Open Access License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Citation Format:
Article Info
Section: Articles
Language: EN
In Vol 3, No 1 (2019)
Statistics: 249 239
Abstract

This article analyses the contestation of slavery activities in Timor during 19th  century. The slave trade cannot be separated from contestation between three forces, namely the local authority (rajah), colonial entities residing in Timor, and pirates from Bugis, Ende, and Sulu.  The rajah fought each other on the battlefield to decide which of them worthy of a “gift” of the war, which were women and children as merchandise for sale. Meanwhile, colonial complaints about the limited human labor to be employed in various types of work not only encouraged increased slave raiding and the purchase of slaves in distant places, but at the same time fostered slave trading activities, both were sponsored by the Dutch and Portuguese. One of the main causes of the ongoing slave trade was piracy at sea, three actors were pioneering slave raiding, namely Balanini/Ilanun, Bugis and Makassar pirate, and Ende pirate. By applying historical method, this research questioned why locals, Europeans, and pirate rulers contested to obtain slaves in Timor? The rise of capitalism was marked by the demand for cheap labor in 19th century. Therefore, slave commodities were mobilized to meet the need for labour in plantations or companies owned by the colonial government.

Keywords: Keywords: slavery, local authority (rajah), colonial entities, pirates

Article Metrics:

  1. “Correspondence, The Singapore Free Press and Merchantile Advertiser, May 28, 1846, 2.
  2. “Java Items”, Straits Times Overland Journal, July 22, 1876, 2.
  3. “Java News”, Straits Times Overland Journal, October 31, 1878, 3. From the Daily Times, October 31 (Translated to the Straits Times).
  4. “Java”, The Singapore Free Press and Merchantile Advertiser, October 6, 1849, 6.
  5. “Nederlanders en Portugeezen op Timor”, Leeuwarder Courant, September 20, 1913.
  6. “Netherlands India”, Strait Times Weekly Issue, January 11, 1893, 8.
  7. “Straits Times Overland Journal”, Straits Times Overland Journal, June 14, 1873, 4.
  8. ANRI. K. 43, Timor: 51.
  9. ARA, Algemeen verslag van Timor 1824.(Col. G.J.C. Schneither, 131) in Parimartha, Perdagangan dan Politik, 176.
  10. Carvalho, J. da Silva ‘Bases destinadas a promover a íntima ligação entre as autoridades administrativas e os Serviços Agrícolas da Colónia’, in: Primeira Conferência Económica do Império Colonial Português, Terceira Comissão, Colónia de Timôr. (Lisbon: Ministério das Colónias, 1936), in Shepherd and Andrew McWilliam, “Cultivating Plantations”, 330.
  11. Earl, GW., “Mr. Earl’s Report”, the Singapore Free Press and Merchantile Advertiser, October 26, 1848.
  12. Forbes, Henry O. , “On Some of the Tribes of the Island of Timor", Journal of the Anstropological Institute, 1884.
  13. Hägerdal, Hans. Lords of the Land, Lords of the Sea: Conflict and Adaptation in Early Colonial Timor, 1600-1800. Leiden: KITLV Press, 2012.
  14. Hicks, D, Tetum ghosts and kin: Fertility and gender in East Timor. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press. 2004 [1976].
  15. Hogendorp, W. Van. 1779/1780, “Beschrijving van het eiland Timor”, 278, in Parimartha, Perdagangan dan Politik, 132-133.
  16. Laura Bohannan, ed. Taboo, Routledge ISBN 9978-0-415-33040-4.
  17. NA, VOC 1531, Resolutions, 5 December 1692, in Hägerdal “The Slaves of Timor”, 35.
  18. Needham, Rodney. “Sumba and the Slave Trade. Clayton: Monash University, Centrex of Southeast Asian Studies”. Working Paper, 31, 1985.
  19. Niemeijer, Henk, Batavia Masyarakat Kolonial Abad XVII. Jakarta: Komunitas Bambu, 2012.
  20. Parimartha, I Gde. Perdagangan dan politik di Nusa Tenggara, 1815 1915. Jakarta : Perwakilan KITLV : Djambatan, 2002.
  21. Roque, R Headhunting and colonialism: Anthropology and the circulation of human skulls in the Portuguese empire, 1870-1930. Cambridge: Palgrave McMillan, Roque, 2010.
  22. Rundjan, Rahadian, “Skandal Perbudakan Raffles di Hindia Belanda”, Historia, April 2, 2015, https://historia.id/modern/articles/skandal-perbudakan-raffles-di-hindia-belanda-v279B.
  23. Rutter, Owen. The Pirate Wind: Tales of the Sea-robbers of Malaya. London: Oxford University Press, 1986, 45-47.
  24. Shepherd, Christopher J. and Andrew McWilliam, “Cultivating Plantations and Subjects in East Timor: A Genealogy”, Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 169 (2013), 326-361.
  25. Sulistiyono, Singgih Tri. The Java Sea Network : Patterns In The Development Of Interregional Shipping And Trade In The Process Of National Economic Integration In Indonesia, 1870s-1970s. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden, 2003.
  26. Thosibo, Anwar. Historiografi Perbudakan: Sejarah Perbudakan di Sulawesi Selatand Abad XIX. Magelang: IndonesiaTera, 2002.
  27. Warren, James Francis. The Sulu Zone: The Dynamics of External Trade, Slavery, and Ethnicity in the Transformation of a Southeast Asian Maritime State. Singapore: NUS Press, 2007.
  28. Warren, James. Iranun and Balangingi Globalization, Maritime Raiding, and the Birth of Ethnicity. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press, 2002.
  29. Wielenga “Soemba voorheen en thans”, 25 in Parimartha, Perdagangan dan Politik, 132.

Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Maritime Studies and National Integration License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this is Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA).

Creative Commons License