skip to main content

Mengukur Perilaku Manusia dalam Skala Besar dan Secara Real-time: Studi Kasus Pola Mobilitas Penduduk dan Fase Awal Pandemi COVID-19 di Indonesia

*Aditya Lia Ramadona scopus  -  Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Risalia Reni Arisanti  -  Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Anis Fuad  -  Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Muhammad Ali Imron  -  Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Citra Indriani  -  Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Riris Andono Ahmad  -  Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Received: 5 Dec 2022; Published: 31 Aug 2023.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Background: Good decisions in policy-making rely on acquiring the best possible understanding at the fast pace of what is happening and what might happen next in the population. Immediate measurements and predictions of disease spread would help authorities take necessary action to mitigate the rapid geographical spread of potential emerging infectious diseases. Unfortunately, measuring human behavior in nearly real-time, specifically at a large scale, has been labor-intensive, time-consuming, and expensive. Consequently, measurements are often unfeasible or delayed in developing in-time policy decisions. The increasing use of online services such as Twitter generates vast volumes and varieties of data, often available at high speed. These datasets might provide the opportunity to obtain immediate measurements of human behavior. Here we describe how the patterns of population mobility can be associated with the number of COVID-19 cases and, subsequently, could be used to simulate the potential path of disease spreading.

Methods: Our analysis of country-scale population mobility networks is based on a proxy network from geotagged Twitter data, which we incorporated into a model to reproduce the spatial spread of the early phase COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. We used aggregated province-level mobility data from January through December 2019 for the baseline mobility patterns from DKI Jakarta as the origin of the 33 provinces' destinations in Indonesia.

Result: We found that population mobility patterns explain 62 percent of the variation in the occurrence of COVID-19 cases in the early phases of the pandemic. In addition, we confirm that online services have the potential to measure human behavior in nearly real time.

Conclusion: We believe that our work contributes to previous research by developing a scalable early warning system for public health decision-makers in charge of developing mitigation policies for the potential spread of emerging infectious diseases.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: COVID-19; Big Data; Early Warning System; Human Behavior; Digital Public Health

Article Metrics:

  1. R. Djalante et al. 2020. “Review and analysis of current responses to COVID-19 in Indonesia: Period of January to March 2020,” Prog. Disaster Sci., vol. 6, p. 100091, Apr. doi: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100091
  2. Vivi Setiawaty et al. 2020. “The Identification of First COVID-19 Cluster in Indonesia.,” Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., vol. 103, no. 6, pp. 2339–2342. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0554
  3. R. O. Nanda et al. 2022 “Community Mobility and COVID-19 Dynamics in Jakarta, Indonesia,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health, vol. 19, no. 11, p. 6671. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116671
  4. S. Changruenngam, D. J. Bicout, and C. Modchang. 2020. “How the individual human mobility spatio-temporally shapes the disease transmission dynamics,” Sci. Rep., vol. 10, no. 1. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68230-9
  5. A. Findlater and I. I. Bogoch. 2018. “Human Mobility and the Global Spread of Infectious Diseases: A Focus on Air Travel,” Trends Parasitol., vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 772–783. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2018.07.004
  6. A. L. Ramadona, Y. Tozan, L. Lazuardi, and J. Rocklöv, 2019. “A combination of incidence data and mobility proxies from social media predicts the intra-urban spread of dengue in Yogyakarta, Indonesia,” PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis., vol. 13, no. 4, p. e0007298, Apr doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007298
  7. J. Rocklöv et al. 2019. “Using Big Data to Monitor the Introduction and Spread of Chikungunya, Europe, 2017,” Emerg. Infect. Dis., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1041–1049. doi: 10.3201/eid2506.180138
  8. R. Jurdak, K. Zhao, J. Liu, M. AbouJaoude, M. Cameron, and D. Newth, 2015. “Understanding human mobility from Twitter,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1–16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131469
  9. B. Hawelka, I. Sitko, E. Beinat, S. Sobolevsky, P. Kazakopoulos, and C. Ratti, “Geo-located Twitter as proxy for global mobility patterns,” Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 260–271, May 2014, doi: 10.1080/15230406.2014.890072
  10. T. Üsküplü, F. Terzi, and H. Kartal. 2020. “Discovering Activity Patterns in the City by Social Media Network Data: a Case Study of Istanbul,” Appl. Spat. Anal. Policy, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 945–958. doi: 10.1007/s12061-020-09336-5
  11. S. F. Pane and J. Ramdan, 2022. “Pemodelan Machine Learning: Analisis Sentimen Masyarakat terhadap Kebijakan PPKM Menggunakan Data Twitter,” J. Sist. Cerdas, vol. 5, no. 1. doi: https://doi.org/10.37396/jsc.v5i1.191
  12. D. Thorpe Huerta, J. B. Hawkins, J. S. Brownstein, and Y. Hswen. 2021. “Exploring discussions of health and risk and public sentiment in Massachusetts during COVID-19 pandemic mandate implementation: A Twitter analysis,” SSM - Popul. Health, vol. 15, p. 100851. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100851
  13. A. Abd-Alrazaq, D. Alhuwail, M. Househ, M. Hamdi, and Z. Shah. 2020. “Top Concerns of Tweeters During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Infoveillance Study.,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 22, no. 4. doi: 10.2196/19016
  14. Z. T. Osakwe, I. Ikhapoh, B. K. Arora, and O. M. Bubu. 2020. “Identifying public concerns and reactions during the COVID-19 pandemic on Twitter: A text-mining analysis,” Public Health Nurs., vol. 19, no. June, pp. 1–7, 20. doi: 10.1111/phn.12843
  15. K. M. Carley, M. Malik, M. Kowalchuk, J. Pfeffer, and P. Landwehr. 2015. “Twitter Usage in Indonesia,” Institute for Software Research, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
  16. C. Zeng et al., 2021. “Spatial-Temporal Relationship Between Population Mobility and COVID-19 Outbreaks in South Carolina: Time Series Forecasting Analysis,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 23, no. 4, p. e27045. doi: 10.2196/27045
  17. N. Setyasaputra, 2021. “Kajian Sistem Deteksi Dini pada saat Pandemi COVID19,” J. Sist. Cerdas, vol. 4, no. 1. doi: https://doi.org/10.37396/jsc.v4i1.108
  18. R. Rachmawati, E. T. W. Mei, I. W. Nurani, R. A. Ghiffari, A. A. Rohmah, and M. A. Sejati. 2021. “Innovation in Coping with the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Best Practices from Five Smart Cities in Indonesia,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 21, p. 12072. doi: 10.3390/su132112072
  19. X. Huang, Z. Li, Y. Jiang, X. Li, and D. Porter. 2020. “Twitter reveals human mobility dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic,” PLOS ONE, vol. 15, no. 11, p. e0241957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241957
  20. LSHTM CMMID COVID-19 working group et al., 2020. “Changing travel patterns in China during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic,” Nat. Commun., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 5012. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18783-0
  21. G. McNeill, J. Bright, and S. A. Hale. 2012. “Estimating local commuting patterns from geolocated Twitter data,” EPJ Data Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 24. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-017-0120-x
  22. S. Hasan, X. Zhan, and S. V. Ukkusuri, 2013. “Understanding urban human activity and mobility patterns using large-scale location-based data from online social media,” in Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGKDD International Workshop on Urban Computing - UrbComp ’13, New York, New York, USA. p. 1. doi: 10.1145/2505821.2505823

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.