The Development of Technology-supported Approaches to the LO Process for Accredited Engineering Programs

Dale Lackeyram, John R Donald, Richard Gorrie, Richard G Zytner


DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijee.1.2.74-84

Abstract


Tracking graduate outcomes is a new requirement for engineering education in Canada.  Working closely with curriculum developers and educational technologists, the School of Engineering at the University of Guelph has shown it is possible to put in place an effective process.  The process requires engaged participants, an open-mindedness and integrated technologies to collect and report the data.  Combining people, process and technology provides a way for data analysis to satisfy accreditation requirements and internal quality education metrics.  This paper describes the approach taken and identifies strengths, challenges, and opportunities to be successful, and support the ultimate goal of curriculum improvement.

Keywords


accreditation, learning management system, learning outcomes, quality assurance, continuous improvement

Full Text:

FULL TEXT PDF

References


Best Practical (2019) www.bestpractical.com

Biggs, John (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education 32:347-364.

Blooms (2018) Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning Domains, http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/ bloom.html, accessed July 12, 2018.

CEAB (2018) 2017 Accreditation Criteria and Procedures, Engineers Canada, ISSN 1708-8054, Ottawa, ON, 126p.

D2L (2018) Desire 2 Learn, http://www.d2l.com

EngCan (2018) Engineers Canada, https://engineerscanada.ca/accreditation/accredited-programs, accessed July 12, 2018

EGAD (2014) Engineering Graduate Attribute Development http://egad.engineering.queensu.ca, accessed July 24, 2018.

Ghrayeb, O., Damodaran, P. and Vohra, P. (2011). Art of triangulation: An effective assessment validation strategy. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 13(3), 96–101.

HEQCO (2006) Priorities and research agenda for the Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario, http://www.ontla.on.ca/library/repository/mon/18000/275493.pdf, accessed July 24, 2018.

IEA (2018) International Engineering Alliance, http://www.ieagreements.org/accords/washington, accessed July 12, 2018.

Kenny, N. & Desmarais, S. (2012) A guide to developing and assessing learning outcomes at the University of Guelph. Office of the Associate Vice-President (Academic). http://www.uoguelph.ca/ vpacademic/avpa/pdf/LearningOutcomes.pdf.

Mathison, S. (1998) Why Triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17(2):13-17.

OUCQA (2010) Ontario Universities Council on Quality Assurance. 2010. Quality Assurance Framework. Approved by the Ontario Council of Academic Vice-Presidents (February 8, 2010).

PEO (2018) Professional Engineers Ontario, Pre-Graduation Work Experience, http://www.peo.on.ca/ index.php?ci_id=2059&la_id=1#pregraduation, accessed July 12, 2018.

UofG (2011) University of Guelph Institutional Quality Assurance Process (IQAP). Final approval by Ontario Universities Council on Quality Assurance (June 3, 2011).

UofG (2018) University of Guelph Learning Outcomes, https://www.uoguelph.ca/vpacademic/ avpa/outcomes, accessed July 24, 2018.

Wolf, P. (2007) A Model for Facilitating Curriculum Development in Higher Education: A Faculty-Driven, Data-Informed, and Educational Developer-Supported Approach. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Number 112, Winter.





Published by Faculty of Engineering in collaboration with Vocational School, Diponegoro University - Indonesia.
 
 
  
slot gacor slot