skip to main content

The Implementation of the Kampung Improvement Program in Semarang: Some Obstacles and Impacts

*Desi Tri Susilowati  -  Master Program of History, Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Yety Rochwulaningsih scopus  -  Master Program of History, Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Haryono Rinardi  -  Master Program of History, Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study analyzes Kampung Improvement Program (KIP) implementation and its impact on social life in Semarang between 1978-1988 periods. The KIP program is considered successful in building and managing slum settlements in Semarang. The success of Semarang in implementing this program makes it as a pilot project for the arrangement of two cities in Southeast Asia, namely Manila and Bangkok in 1987. This study emphasizes the use of government documents and newspapers to analyze KIP implementation progress in Semarang in the period of 1978 and ended at 1988. The program implementation was divided into two major stages, KIP Urban III and KIP Urban V. From KIP program, various physical infrastructure to support basic needs, such as toilets, clean water networks, sanitation, and road paving have been built. In its development, the KIP implementation brings a new face to Semarang towards slum villages, decreases the social pathology of the communities, and develops social groups, such as empowering Integrated Health Service Port (Posyandu) and Family Welfare Program (PKK). KIP Urban III was able to complete the construction of 21 villages, while in KIP Urban V there were 35 villages, bringing the total number of 56 villages developed.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Kampung Improvement Program (KIP); Urban Problems; Slum; Settlement.

Article Metrics:

  1. Abdullah, H., Lestari, N., Widodo, Sutejo, Masjkuri, N. N. (1987). Tingkat Kesadaran Sejarah Masyarakat Propinsi Jawa Tengah: Kotamadya Semarang. Jakarta: Direktorat Sejarah dan Purbakala
  2. Aminudin, (2015). Fungsi pengawasan DPRD dalam mewujudkan tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik. Jurnal Katalogis, 3 (12)
  3. Devas, N. (1981). Indonesia's Kampung Improvement Program: An evaluative case study. Ekistics, 48 (286), 19-36. Retrieved December 15, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43620193
  4. DPRD Kodya Semarang setujui perbaikan 27 kampung dengan dana Bank Dunia. (1978, November 20). Suara Merdeka
  5. Hamidah, N. Rijanta, R. Setiawan, B. & Marfai, M. A. (2016). Analisis permukiman tepian sungai yang berkelanjutan, Jurnal Inersia, XII (1) https://doi.org/10.21831/inersia.v12i1.10343
  6. Haryono, A. T. (2008), Perencanaan Jaringan Drainase Sub Sistem Bandarharjo Barat. Semarang: Jurusan Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro
  7. Hasil perbaikan kampung. (1980, August 24). Suara Merdeka
  8. Kumala, S. & Yusman, F. (2014). Kajian karakteristik dan metode penanganan kawasan kumuh di Semarang. Jurnal Teknik PWK, 3 (2). https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/pwk/article/view/5046
  9. Perbaiki Jalan-jalan kampung. (1978, March 15) Suara Merdeka
  10. Purwantiasning, A. W. (2011). Pola dan strategi perbaikan permukiman kumuh di perkotaan. Jurnal Nalar, 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.24853/nalars.10.1.%25p
  11. Realisasi air bersih KIP bukan tanggungan PAM. (1983, July 15). Suara Merdeka
  12. Regional Development Agencies of Semarang (1986). Hasil Penyuluhan Perencanaan Kota dan Program Perbaikan Kampung (KIP) Tahun 1986. Semarang: Bappeda
  13. Simone, A. (2015). The Urban Poor and Their Ambivalent Exceptionalities: Some Notes from Jakarta. Current Anthropology, 56 (S11), S15-S23. doi: 10.1086/682283
  14. Soemardi, S. (1972). Kerangka permasalahan: Kebijakan nasional perkembangan perkotaan. Prisma, 7
  15. Terancam banjir Banger. (1982, January 6) Suara Merdeka
  16. Warga Jagalan dan Brumbungan lega: Kalau keberatan dipindah walikota tidak memaksa. (1983, November 26). Suara Merdeka

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.