skip to main content

Binsyouwi, A Gender Discourse of Biak Women Social Politics Roles in Society: Identity, Hegemonic and Intersectionality

*NOVIETA H SARI orcid scopus  -  Newcastle University, United Kingdom

Citation Format:
Abstract

The focus of this article is the study of Biak women’s discourse, Binsyouwi, a contextualised narrative of Biak women, living a feminist life. Sensational and structural oppressions are discussed with the interlocking ‘walls’ of gender, class and sexism exposed through local and historical narratives and cultural discourse analysis. Binsyouwi is explored to re-articulate agendas for feminist theory and activism in Biak Tribal, particularly their roles in politics, family/household and social life. In the context of a larger discourse on intersectionality, identity, and hegemony anchored in local discourse practices, the study focuses on the 'Mambri Bin' category, portraying her as an extraordinary and knowledgeable woman. It emphasises how important it is to address various forms of oppression to create conscious feminist subjectivities. The study uses intersectionality and gender discourse analysis to investigate the social and political story paradigms of the Binsyouwi figure in Biak society. To clarify the knowledge position of Biak women within their cultural and social setting, it examines feminist theories pertaining to discourse, hegemony, identity, and intersectional praxis in the context of intercultural communication. It also explores the difficulties and systemic power relations. The results show that a variety of factors, including capacity, political stance, economic reasoning, and historical fallacy, influence the levels of stability, rationality, adaptability, and inclusivity. These aspects also appear as common characteristics in the discourse process. In this turn, to improve gender responsiveness in policies and planning, we support cultural communication techniques. This is imperative to address implicit cultural norms around hegemonic masculinity, which call for nuanced and comprehensive communication to reduce bias and promote gender mainstreaming in the development and governance systems.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Intersectionality, Identity, Hegemonic Masculinity, Hegemonic Femininity, Cultural Discourse Analysis

Article Metrics:

  1. Alba-Juez, Laura (2016) ‘Discourse Analysis and Pragmatics: Their Scope and Relation’. Russian Journal of Linguistics 20, no. 4, pp.43–55. https://doi.orvang/10.22363/2312-9182-2016-20-4-43-55
  2. Capozza, Dora, and Rupert Brown, eds. Social Identity Processes: Trends in Theory and Research. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2000
  3. Cho S, Crenshaw K and McCall (2013) Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theories, applications, and praxis, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol. 38 (4), 785-810
  4. Crenshaw, K. (2013) Demarginalizing the Intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. In D. K. Weisbert (Ed), Feminist legal theory: Foundations (pp. 383-395). Philadelphia: Temple University Press. (Original work published 1989)
  5. Collins, PH., (2005) Black Public Intellectuals: from du bois to the present, Context, Vol. 4(4), 22-27. American Sociological Association. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press. DOI: 10.1525/ctx/2005.4.4.22
  6. Collins, PH., (2015) Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 41, 1-20 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142
  7. Du Gay, P., Hall, S., Janes, L., Mackay, H., & Negus, K. (1997) Doing cultural studies: The story of the Sony Walkman. Sage Publications, Inc
  8. Farrugia, David (2015) ‘Addressing the Problem of Reflexivity in Theories of Reflexive Modernisation: Subjectivity and Structural Contradiction’. Journal of Sociology 51, no. 4, pp.872–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783313480396
  9. Goodwin, Jean (2014) ‘Conceptions of Speech Acts in the Theory and Practice of Argumentation: A Case Study of a Debate About Advocating’. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 36, no. 1, pp.79–98. https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2014-0003
  10. Gouws, Amanda (2017) Feminist intersectionality and the matrix of domination in South Africa, Agenda, 31:1, 19-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2017.1338871
  11. Gramsci, A. (2009), Selections from the Prison Notebooks, Orient BlackSwan, New Delhi
  12. Hamilton et al., (2019) Hegemonic Femininities and Intersectional Domination, Sociological Theory, 2019-12-01, Vol.37 (4), 315-341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275119888248
  13. Lawler, Steph (2014) Identity: Sociological Perspective, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK
  14. May, VM., (2015) Pursuing Intersectionality Unsettling Dominant Imaginaries, New York: Routledge
  15. Moran, Richard (2018) The Exchange of Words. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190873325.001.0001
  16. Nayak, Anoop (2017) ‘Purging the Nation: Race, Conviviality and Embodied Encounters in the Lives of British Bangladeshi Muslim Young Women’. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 42, no. 2, pp.289–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12168
  17. Pain, Rachel (2004) ‘Social Geography: Participatory Research’. Progress in Human Geography 28, no. 5, pp.652–63. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph511pr
  18. Reed, Maureen G., and Shannon Bruyneel (2010). ‘Rescaling Environmental Governance, Rethinking the State: A Three-Dimensional Review’. Progress in Human Geography 34, no. 5, pp.646–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132509354836
  19. Roth, J. (2013) Entangled Inequalities as Intersectionalities: Towards an Epistemic Sensibilization, Working Paper Series No. 43, Berlin: desiguALdades.net Research Network on Independent Inequalities in Latin America
  20. Schippers, Mimi. 2016. Beyond Monogamy: Polyamory and the Future of Polyqueer Sexualities. New York: New York University Press
  21. Scollo, Michelle (2011) ‘Cultural Approaches to Discourse Analysis: A Theoretical and Methodological Conversation with Special Focus on Donal Carbaugh’s Cultural Discourse Theory’. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 6, no. 1, pp.1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2010.536550
  22. Tajfel, H. (Ed.), 1982. Social identity and intergroup relations, European studies in social psychology. Cambridge University Press; Editions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme, Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]; New York: Paris

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.