Japanese and Javanese Directive Forms: A Study in Sociolinguistics

*Teguh Santoso -  Univesitas Ngudiwaluyo
Received: 19 Sep 2018; Published: 23 Oct 2018.
Open Access
Citation Format:
Article Info
Section: Articles
Language: EN
Full Text:
Statistics: 107 64
Abstract

Abstract

 

This paper is based on a study on directive forms in Japanese and Javanese Languages. The study combines a qualitative and sociolinguistically informed comparative method. The data were taken from different sources, namely Shin Suikodenand Jin (a Japanese novel and play respectively), Ketoprak Wiswakarman (a traditional Javanese play), and Panjebar Semangat (a Javanese magazine), and were then analyzed from a contrastive linguistic perspective. Theories on Japanese and Javanese descriptive sentences, namely those of Ishii,[1] Masuoka,[2] Poedjosoedarmo,[3] Sasangka,[4] and Wedhawati,[5] were used. In addition, Sudaryanto’s,[6] descriptive method, Sanada’s,[7] concept of Sociolinguistics, as well as Tarigan’s,[8] Ishiwata and Takahashi’s,[9] theories of contrastive linguistics were also consulted. The study aimed to describe the similarities and differences between Japanese and Javanese directive sentences based on the data from the dialogs. The study concludes that the speech levels used by the addressers and addressees in the Japanese dialogs are those of futsuugo and teineigo, which are comparable to those of ungguh-ungguh ngoko and ungguh-ungguh madya/krama in the Javanese dialogs.

 

Keywords: directive; request; Japanese; Javanese; Sociolinguistics

Article Metrics:

  1. References
  2. Ishi, Kazuko. 1984. Jawago no Kiso: Dhasar-dhasarSinauBasaJawa. Tokyo: Todaishozai
  3. Mazuoka, Takahashi danTakubo Yukinori. 1999. KisoNihongoBunpou. Tokyo: KuroshioShuppan.
  4. Poejosoedarmo, Soepomoet al. 1979. Tingkat TuturBahasaJawa. Jakarta: PusatPembinaandanPengembanganBahasa-DepartemenPendidikandanKebudayaan.
  5. Sasangka, Sri SatriyaTjaturWisnu. 2004. Unggah-ungguhBahasaJawa. Jakarta: YayasanParamalingua.
  6. Sudaryanto. 1993. Metode Linguistik: Ke Arah MemahamiMetodeLinguistik. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
  7. Sudaryanto. 1993. Metodedan Aneka TeknikAnalisisBahasa: PengantarPenelitianWahanaKebudayaanSecaraLinguistis. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana Press.
  8. Sanada, Shinji, et.al. 2000. Shakaigengogaku. Tokyo: Oufuu.
  9. Tarigan, Henry Guntur. 1992. Pengajaran Analisis Kontrastif Bahasa. Bandung: Angkasa
  10. Ishiwata, Toshio, dan Makoto Takahashi. 1998. TaishouGengogaku. Tokyo: Oufu.
  11. Suwito. 1983. PengantarAwal Sosiolinguistik: Teoridan Problema. Surakarta: Kenary Offset.
  12. Mahsun. 2014. MetodePenelitianBahasa :TahapanStrategi, MetodedanTekniknya. Jakarta: PT. RajagrafindoPersada.
  13. Yoshikawa, Eiji. 2011. Shin Suikoden (Indonesian translation by: Jonjon Johana and Mikihiro Moriyama). Jakarta: Kansha Book.
  14. Enshuucho. 2011. Jin :KanzenShinario to DokyumentoBukku. Tokyo :NyuusuTsuushinsha.
  15. Santosa, Trisno. 2011. RambatRangkung. Surakarta: DinasKebudayaandanPariwisata.
  16. http://www.panjebarsemangat.co.id/ (accessed on December, 28th 2015).
  17. ______________2014. Sang Pembayun. Surakarta: Wiswakarman UNS.