DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ca.v7i1.18992

An Analysis of Direct And Indirect Apology in The Daredevil First Season (2015) Series

Hagi Alwirido  -  Diponegoro University, Indonesia
*Oktiva Herry Candra  -  Diponegoro University, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
This research is about the analysis of the speech act of apology strategy. The researcher analyzes theapology strategies phenomenon in the Daredevil First Season (2015) series. The study aims toreveal the direct and indirect apologies and the social functions of the apologies produced by thecharacters in the series. The research method of this study adheres to descriptive qualitative, withnon-participatoryobservationasthemethodofcollectingdata.Then,thecollecteddataisanalyzedusing [8] and [6]. The researcher discovers that both direct and indirect apologies are used by thecharacters in this series with direct apologies as the most frequently used apologies strategy.There are also 5 social functions of the apology expressed by the characters in the series, namelyshowing good manners, showing contrition, asking to be forgiven, getting off the hook, andassuaging the addressee’swrath.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: speech act; illocutionary; expressive; apology

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Linguistic Studies
Language : EN
Recent articles
New Trend in Education after Covid-19 Attack: EFL Higher Students’ Experiences in Hybrid Environment in a Private University Problematics of Unrequited Love in the Modern Javanese Song “Klebus” by Ngatmombilung (Critical Discourse Analysis) An Analysis of Direct And Indirect Apology in The Daredevil First Season (2015) Series Taboo Words Spoken by the Main Characters of Louis Leterrier’s The Brothers Grimsby Movie Analysis of Word Formation Process in Register Used by English and Indonesian Football Commentary R.A. Kartini’s Letters: The Emergence of the Subaltern? Loneliness as Depicted in James Arthur's Empty Space Manuscripts and Philological Studies in Indonesia More recent articles
  1. Arifin, Z. (2011). Penelitian Pendidikan : Metode dan Paradigma Baru. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya
  2. Gillian. B & G. Yule. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge University Press
  3. Hardani, Andriani, H., Ustiawaty, J., Utami, E. F., Istiqomah, R. R., Fardani, R. A., Sukmana,
  4. D. J., & Auliya, N. H. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Penerbit Pustaka Ilmu
  5. Hudson, R. A. (1996). Sociolinguistics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press
  6. J. C. Richard & R. Schmidt (2002). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Pearson
  7. N. R. Norrick. (1978). “Expressive illocutionary acts”. Journal of Pragmatics. 2 (3). https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(78)90005-X
  8. Siyoto, S., & Sodikin, M. A. (2015). Dasar Metodologi Penelitian (Cetakan 1). Literasi Media Publishing
  9. Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage Pragmatics Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Mouton de Gruyter
  10. Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.