The Morphosyntactic Structure of the Words Having the Root Nyata in the Indonesian Language: A Corpus-Linguistic Approach
Abstract
One issue which is frequently discussed in linguistic study is the connection between the principle of morphology and syntax. Morphosyntax is a term used in linguistics studying the application of morphology and syntax on grammatical categories. In short, morphosyntax is the combination between morphological and syntactic studies. The writer correlates the relation between morphology and syntax by applying corpus-linguistics, the study of language data on a large scale. Corpus-linguistics is used as a method to identify each form of morphological process in the word having root nyata in wider context. The result of this research shows the relationship between morphosyntactic structure and lemmatization (the process of determining the lemma for a given lexeme). According to Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, the word having root nyata is classified as verb and noun with nyata as the head word. In this study, the word having root nyata does not merely belong to both verb and noun. Furthermore, the research indicates that morphological process alters not only its parts of speech but also its head word in dictionary.
Keywords: morphosyntax, corpus-linguistics, lemma, dictionary, Indonesian language
References
Alwi, Hasan., Soenjono Dardjowidjojo, Hans Lapoliwa and Antono M. Moeliono. (1999). Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Booij, G. (2005). The Grammar of Words: An Introduction to Linguistic Morphology (Oxford Textbooks in Linguistics). New York: Oxford University Press.
Darheni, N. (2010). Analisis Kontrastif Klausa Pasif Bahasa Indonesia dan Bahasa Sunda: Tinjauan Morfosintaksis. Jurnal Sosioteknologi Edisi 19 Tahun 9 , 844-855.
Glenn, Cheryl and Loretta Gray. (2010). The Writer’s Harbrace Handbook, Brief Edition. Wadsworth Publishing.
Hamzah, A. (2013). Interferensi Morfosintaksis Bahasa Bugis pada Karangan Bahasa Indonesia Siswa SD . Technology, Education, and Science International Conference, (pp. 588-596). Malaysia.
Haspelmath, Martin and Andrea D. Sims. (2002). Understanding Morphology (Understanding Language). London: Routledge.
Jensen, J. T. (1990). Morphology: Word structure in Generative Grammar (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Kridalaksana, H. (2005). Kelas Kata dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Kwary and Sugiri. (2004). Pengaruh Skemata Struktur Bahasa Indonesia Terhadap Kecampingan Kalimat Bahasa Inggris pada TWE Peserta Kursus Toefl di Surabaya: Suatu Kajian Morfosintaksis. Jurnal Penelitian Dinamika Sosial Vol. 5 No. 3 , 273-288.
McEnery, Tony & Andrew Hardie. (2012). Corpus Linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rabita, E. (2014). Morfosintaksis Reduplikasi Kategori Nomina dalam Bahasa Indonesia. http://library.usu.ac.id/download/fs/perpus-eva.pdf.
Ridyawati, I. (2015). Analisis Kesalahan Morfosintaksis pada Karangan Narasi Siswa Kelas X Seni Rupa SMKN 9 Surakarta. Skripsi . Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Shortis, T. (2001). The Language of ICT: Information and Communication Technology (Intertext). London: Routledge.
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Van Valin , Robert D. Jr and Randy J. LaPoll. (1998). Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whaley, L. J. (1996). Introduction to Typology: The Unity and Diversity of Language. California: SAGE Publications.