BibTex Citation Data :
@article{ALJ6591, author = {Anggita Lumbanraja}, title = {Peran Hakim Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Keputusan Fiktif Positif}, journal = {Administrative Law and Governance Journal}, volume = {2}, number = {4}, year = {2019}, keywords = {}, abstract = { In the Lex Silencio Positivo cases, there is no Consultative Meeting and Preparatory Examination. Meanwhile, the two examinations are necessary. This research intends to explore the Role of Judges in Lex Silencio Positivo cases where the Judge does not get a particular stage to examine the Applicants' petition files, both formal and material terms. This study uses the normative juridical method. The results of this study Judges play an essential role in distributing the burden of evidence fairly. The Judge should also carefully examine the Applicants' petition files to prevent the misuse of Positive Fictitious Decisions by the Applicants Keywords: Judges, Lex Silencio Positivo, Evidence. Abstrak Pada Penyelesaian Sengketa Keputusan Fiktif Positif tidak ada Rapat Permusyawaratan dan Pemeriksaan Persiapan karena sifatnya yang berupa permohonan. Sementara kedua pemeriksaan tersebut penting karena untuk memeriksa dari segi formil dan segi materiil. Penelitian ini hendak menggali Peran Hakim pada Penyelesaian Sengketa Keputusan Fiktif Positif di mana Hakim tidak mendapatkan tahapan khusus untuk memeriksa berkas Permohonan Pemohon baik dari segi formil maupun materiil. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dalam. Hasil dari penelitian ini Hakim memegang peranan penting dalam membagi beban pembuktian secara adil. Hakim juga harus memeriksa dengan teliti berkas Permohonan Pemohon untuk mencegah terjadinya penyalahgunaan Keputusan Fiktif Positif oleh Pemohon. Kata Kunci : Hakim, Keputusan Fiktif Positif, Pembuktian. }, issn = {2621-2781}, pages = {677--685} doi = {10.14710/alj.v2i4.677-685}, url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/alj/article/view/6591} }
Refworks Citation Data :
In the Lex Silencio Positivo cases, there is no Consultative Meeting and Preparatory Examination. Meanwhile, the two examinations are necessary. This research intends to explore the Role of Judges in Lex Silencio Positivo cases where the Judge does not get a particular stage to examine the Applicants' petition files, both formal and material terms. This study uses the normative juridical method. The results of this study Judges play an essential role in distributing the burden of evidence fairly. The Judge should also carefully examine the Applicants' petition files to prevent the misuse of Positive Fictitious Decisions by the Applicants
Keywords: Judges, Lex Silencio Positivo, Evidence.
Abstrak
Pada Penyelesaian Sengketa Keputusan Fiktif Positif tidak ada Rapat Permusyawaratan dan Pemeriksaan Persiapan karena sifatnya yang berupa permohonan. Sementara kedua pemeriksaan tersebut penting karena untuk memeriksa dari segi formil dan segi materiil. Penelitian ini hendak menggali Peran Hakim pada Penyelesaian Sengketa Keputusan Fiktif Positif di mana Hakim tidak mendapatkan tahapan khusus untuk memeriksa berkas Permohonan Pemohon baik dari segi formil maupun materiil. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dalam. Hasil dari penelitian ini Hakim memegang peranan penting dalam membagi beban pembuktian secara adil. Hakim juga harus memeriksa dengan teliti berkas Permohonan Pemohon untuk mencegah terjadinya penyalahgunaan Keputusan Fiktif Positif oleh Pemohon.
Kata Kunci : Hakim, Keputusan Fiktif Positif, Pembuktian.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Administrative Law & Governance Journal published by State Administrative Law Department Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to the Administrative Law & Governance Journal and Administrative Law Department, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University as the publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses the rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Administrative Law & Governance Journal and Administrative Law Department, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the Administrative Law & Governance Journal are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
The Copyright Transfer Form can be downloaded here: [Copyright Transfer Form Administrative Law & Governance Journal]. The copyright form should be signed originally and send to the Editorial Office in the form of original mail, scanned document:
Muhamad Azhar (Editor-in-Chief)
Editorial Office of Administrative Law & Governance Journal
Administrative Law Department, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University
Campus Prof. Dr. Satjipto Raharjo, S.H,Jl. Prof. Soedarto, SH., Tembalang, SemarangIndonesia 50275
Administrative Law and Governance Journal (e-ISSN 2621-2781) published by the State Administrative Law Department
Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
alj@live.undip.ac.id
https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/alj
