skip to main content

Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 501 K/ PDT.SUS-PHI/ 2016 Tentang Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja

*Sonhaji Sonhaji  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to know that the Certain Working Agreement on Oral Time is not allowed in the legislation, the Supreme Court judges consideration in deciding the case Number 501 K / Pdt.Sus-PHI / 2016 and the conformity of the decision with the law applicable in Indonesia. This study uses normative juridical method, which is analytical descriptive, with data collection method in the form of library study and supported by interview with judges. The results of the research show that First, the judge's decision is unfair to both parties litigation because the defendant is not punished to pay the wage of suspension (wage process) with emphasis on the consideration of unwritten PKWT so that by law become PKWTT. Second The process wage demands which are not accepted by the judge are contrary to the laws and regulations on employment and on the settlement of industrial relations disputes because the law requires that workers and employers continue to perform their obligations until the establishment of an Industrial Dispute Settlement Institution, including the obligation of employers to pay the wage of a suspension (wages process). So the Supreme Court Decision Number 501 K / Pdt.Sus-PHI / 2016 is less in accordance with the prevailing laws and regulations in Indonesia.

 

Keywords: Oral Employment Agreement, Termination Dispute, Employment

Fulltext View|Download

Article Metrics:

  1. Khakim, Abdul. 2014. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia. Bandung : PT. Citra Aditya Bakti
  2. Nazir, Mohammad. 2003. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia
  3. Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Mamudji. 2004. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada
  4. Soemitro, Ronny Hanitjo. 1994. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia
  5. Pancasila
  6. Undang-Undang Dasar Tahun 1945
  7. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial
  8. Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan
  9. Keputusan Menteri Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi Nomor 100/MEN/VI/2004 tentang Ketentuan Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu
  10. Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor Nomor 501 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2016;
  11. Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 404 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2014;
  12. Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial pada Pengadilan Negeri Palembang Nomor 28/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2014/PN.Plg;
  13. Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial pada Pengadilan Negeri Semarang Nomor 44/G/2013/PHI.Smg
  14. Sugianto (Hakim Pengadilan Industrial pada Pengadilan Negeri Semarang), Wawancara, 18 Januari 2018
  15. Tri Jata Ayu Pramesti, Bolehkah Memotong Upah Pekerja yang di-Skorsing?, http://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/lt51480c37790ca/bolehkah-memotong-upah-pekerja-yang-di-skorsing, diakses pada tanggal 19 Januari 2018
  16. Konfederasi Serikat Buruh Sejahtera Indonesia, Putusan Sela Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial, http://www.ksbsi.org/index.php/baca/lengkap/154, diakses pada tanggal 19 Januari 2018

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.