skip to main content

EFFECTIVENESS OF “PROGRAM DESA MANDIRI PANGAN (DMP)” IN SUPPORTING AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION AND HOUSEHOLD FOOD SECURITY IN WONOSOBO DISTRICT

*Himawan Wahyu Pamungkas  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Anang M. Legowo  -  UNDIP, Indonesia
Mukson Mukson  -  UNDIP, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2022 Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Wonosobo Regency is the district with the highest poverty rate in Central Java, reaching 17.58% in 2018. Based on the FSVA map, there are nine sub-districts in Wonosobo Regency with food security criteria (priority 5). The Food Independent Village Program is one of the critical interventions in poverty alleviation and increasing food security. The aims of this research are: 1) to describe socialization and training, mentoring, institutional growth, member participation, the commitment of policymakers, agricultural production, and household food security in Wonosobo Regency; 2) to analyze the influence between socialization and training, mentoring, institutional growth. The research was conducted using a quantitative approach with a survey method. The research location was determined based on consideration of the high poverty level, the condition of food security and vulnerability, and the location of the DMP program village. Sampling was carried out on 118 household heads receiving the DMP program in Reco Village and Kapencar Village. Data was collected based on interviews using questionnaires and observations. The Linkert scale measures variables using: strongly disagree, disagree, undecided, agree, and strongly agree. Descriptive analysis was used to examine respondents' responses to the variables of socialization and training, mentoring, institutional growth, member participation, the commitment of policymakers, agricultural production, and household food security. Based on descriptive analysis, respondents gave responses with high categories for the variables of training socialization, mentoring, institutional growth, member participation, and commitment of policymakers, agricultural production, and household food security. The inner study of the SEM analysis model of the PLS method stated that the variables of socialization and training, mentoring, institutional growth, member participation, and commitment of policymakers had a significant effect on agricultural production. Furthermore, socialization, training, and institutional development significantly impact food security. Still, the variable of assistance, member participation, and policymakers' commitment does not significantly affect food security.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: food security, policymakers, poverty, Wonosobo

Article Metrics:

  1. Adi, A. 1998. Communication and Household Food Security by Archaeological Type in Pasuruan Regency, East Java. Bogor Agricultural University Graduate School
  2. Adi, I, R. 2003. Empowerment, Community Development, and Community Intervention. FEUI. Jakarta
  3. Ali, A., D. B. Rahut, & B. Behera. 2016. Factors Influencing Farmers' Adoption of Energy-Based Water Pumps and Impacts on Crop Productivity and Household Income in Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 54. Elsevier: 48–57
  4. Ahyari, A. 2004. Production Management: Production System Planning.Yogyakarta: BPFE. UGM
  5. Ariola, M. M. 2006. Principles and Methods of Research. Philippines. Rex Book Store Inc
  6. Budiani, N. W. 2007. Effectiveness of the "Eka Taruna Bhakti" Youth Reduction Unemployment Program in Sumerta Kelod Village, East Denpasar District, Denpasar City. Inputs, vol. 2(1) : 49-57
  7. Casley, D. & Kumar, K. 1991. Monitoring and Evaluation of Agricultural Projects, University of Indonesia Press
  8. Central Java Province Statistics Agency, 2019. Percentage of Poor Population by District/City in Central Java Province 1996-2019, Semarang
  9. Central Java Provincial Government. 2014. Regional Regulation Number 5 of 2014 concerning Regional Medium-Term Development Plans for 2013-2018. Semarang
  10. Chin, W. 1998. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research. Vol. 295, No. 2: 295–336. USA
  11. Churchill, G. A. 2005. Fundamentals of Marketing Research Volume 2. 4th ed. Jakarta. Erlangga Publisher
  12. Department of Food, Agriculture, and Fisheries, 2018. Map of Food Security and Vulnerability of Wonosobo Regency. Wonosobo
  13. Fariani, F. 2014. Effectiveness of the Infrastructure Development Acceleration Program in Cilegon City. Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University
  14. Food Security Agency. 2009. General Guidelines for Food Independent Village Action Program, Ministry of Agriculture, Republic of Indonesia
  15. Food Security Agency. 2015. Evaluation of the Food Independent Village Program. Central Java Provincial Government. Semarang
  16. Food Security Agency. 2019. Map of Food Security and Vulnerability, Central Java Provincial Government. Semarang
  17. Gujarati, D. 2004. Basic Econometrics, 4th Edition. New York. The McGraw-Hill Companies
  18. Gustiyana, H. 2003. Farming Income Analysis for Agricultural Products. Salemba four, Jakarta
  19. Ghozali, I. & Fuad. 2008. Structural Equation Modeling. Semarang. Diponegoro University Publishing Agency
  20. Government of the Republic of Indonesia. 2015. Presidential Regulation Number 2 of 2015 concerning the 2015-2019 National Medium-Term Development Plan. Jakarta
  21. Government of the Republic of Indonesia. 2014. Law Number 18 of 2012 concerning Food. Jakarta
  22. Greenberg, J. & Baron, R. A. 2010. Behavior in Organizations: Understanding and Managing the Human Side of Work. 10th Edition. Prentice Hall International Inc
  23. Hamdi, A. S. & Bahruddin, E. 2012. Quantitative Research Methods Applications in Education. Yogyakarta. Deepublish Publisher
  24. Hamrat, M. B. 2018. The Effect of Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes on the Acceptance Level of Organic Cultivation Technology (Case Study of Organic Vegetable Farmers in Ma'rang Subdistrict, Pangkep Regency). Thesis. Graduate School of Agribusiness Studies Program, Hasanuddin University. Macassar
  25. Handoko, H. 2009. Management, Edition II, BPFE and LMP2M-YKPN, Jakarta. IInternational Labor Organization, 1971. Introduction to Work Study (trans. JL Wetik), Erlangga, Jakarta
  26. Hartono. 2008. Statistics for Research. Yogyakarta. Institute for the Study of Society and Women's Philosophy
  27. Herdiana. 2014. Household Food Security in Ciamis Regency. SEPA : Vol. 11 No.1 September 2014 : 21 – 34. Gajah Mada University. Yogyakarta
  28. Hernanto. 1994. Agricultural Science. Self-Help Spreader. Jakarta
  29. Joesron, T. S. & Fathorrozi M. 2003. Microeconomic Theory, Equipped with Several Forms of Production Functions. Salemba Empat Publisher. Jakarta
  30. Keban, Y. T. 2008. Six Strategic Dimensions of Public Administration Concepts, Theories, and Su, Gava Media, Yogyakarta
  31. Language Center Ministry of National Education. 2008. Indonesian Language Dictionary, Minister of National Education RI, Jakarta
  32. Mahsun, M. 2006. Measurement of Public Sector Performance. BPFE Publisher, Yogyakarta
  33. Maryuni, S. 2017. Effectiveness of Output Innovation Program Implementation in Pontianak City, Public Spirit Volume 12 Number 1 Page 25, April 2017
  34. Miller, R. L. & R. E. Miner. 1999. Intermediate Microeconomic Theory. Raja Rafindo Persada. Jakarta
  35. Ministry of Agriculture. 2007. Strategic Plan 2010 – 2014 Agency for Extension and Development of Agricultural Human Resources. Accessed via http://www.pertanian.go.id/ sakip/ admin/ file/ RENSTRA_BPPSDMP_20102014
  36. Ministry of Agriculture. 2015. Regulation of the Minister of Agriculture of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 15/permetan/hk.140/4/2015 concerning the 2015 Food Independent Village Guidelines. Jakarta
  37. Ministry of Agriculture. 2015. Strategic Plan of the 2015-2019 Food Security Agency. Jakarta
  38. Notoatmodjo, S. 2010. Health Promotion Theory and Applications. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta
  39. Nugroho, D. & Riant. 2004. Public Policy for Developing Countries. PT Alex Media Komputindo, Jakarta
  40. Nurhemi. 2014. Mapping of Food Security in Indonesia: TFP Approach and Food Security Index. WP/4/2014, Bank Indonesia
  41. Nursalam. 2010. Implementation Policy to Increase Production of Local Food Crops and Food Security in the Province of East Nusa Tenggara (NTT). Jurnal Public Administration, Volume 1 No.1
  42. Official Gazette of Statistics Number No. 05/01/33/Th. XI, 3 January 2017. Poverty Profile in Central Java September 2016. Semarang
  43. PPK-LIPI. 2004. Household Food Security in Rural Areas: Concepts and Measures.www.bappeda-jabar
  44. Prasetya, D. Y. 2018. the Role of Facilitators and Farmers' Participation in Upsus Rice Crops Program in Gadingrejo District, Pringsewu Regency. Thesis.JAgribusiness affairs, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Lampung. Bandar Lampung
  45. Purwaningsih, Y., Hartono, S., Masyhuri, & Mulyo, J. 2010. Household Food Expenditure Patterns According to Food Security Levels in Central Java Province. Journal of Development Economics Volume 11(2), Pages 236 – 253
  46. Purwaningsih, Y., Hartono, S., Masyhuri, & Mulyo, J. 2010. Household Food Expenditure Patterns According to Food Security Levels in Central Java Province. Journal of Development Economics
  47. Puspa, R. 2013. The Effectiveness of the Food Independent Village Action Program in Karangcegak Village, Kutasan District, Purbalingga Regency. General Sudirman University. Purwokerto
  48. Puspadi, K. 2002. Reconstruction of Agricultural Extension Systems. Postgraduate. Bogor
  49. Regulation of the Minister of Agriculture of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 15/permentan/hk.140/4/2015 concerning Guidelines for Food Independent Villages in 2015. Jakarta
  50. Saeppudin, E., Damayani, N., & Budiono, A. 2018, Community Participation in the Bandung Regency Food Independent Village Program, Sosiohumanities-Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vol 20 No. March 1, 2018
  51. Sarwono, J. 2007. Path Analysis For Business Research With SPSS. Yogyakarta. Andi Publisher
  52. Simon, G. A. 2012. Food Security: Definition, Four Dimensions, History. Retrieved April 18, 2018, address: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/ERP/unit/F4D.pdf
  53. Sugiyono. 2013. Statistics For Research. Bandung. Alphabet
  54. Sukandar, D. 2006. Study of Food Security in Poor and Non-Poor Households. dept. Community Nutrition FEMA_IPB. Bogor
  55. Suratiyah, K. 2015. Farming Science. Jakarta. Self-Help Spreader
  56. Susanti, Y. 2015. Effectiveness of the Sustainable Food House Area Model Program (M-KRPL) in Ngletih Village, Kandat District, Kediri Regency. Unesa. Surabaya
  57. Termeer C. J. A. M., S. Drimie, J. Ingram, L. L. Pereira & M. Whittingham. 2018. A diagnostic framework for food system governance arrangements: The case of South Africa. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences. Vol 84: 85-93
  58. Wahab, A. & Solichin. 2005. Policy Analysis from Formulation to Implementation of State Policy, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta
  59. Warr, P. 2014. Food Insecurity and Its Determinants, The Australian National University
  60. Wibawa, S., Purbokusumo, Y., & Pramusinto, A. 1994, Evaluation of Public Policy, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta
  61. Yulita, R. 2016. Effectiveness of Implementation of Village Fund Allocation (ADD) in Setako Raya Village, Pranap District, Indragiri Hulu Regency, JOM FISIP Vol 12 No. 1, pp. 25-34

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.