BibTex Citation Data :
@article{Agrisocionomics26994, author = {Dina Dwirayani and Nunung Nuryartono and Dwi Rachmina and Amzul Rifin}, title = {The Effectiveness Of People's Business Credit (KUR) In Sugarcane Farming In West Java Province}, journal = {Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian}, volume = {9}, number = {3}, year = {2025}, keywords = {people business credit, credit effectiveness, timely credit disbursement, accurate credit amount}, abstract = { People's Business Credit (KUR) is a credit scheme intended for farmers since 2000. The availability of credit for business actors is used to increase capital. However, not all credit obtained can be categorized as effective. Credit is effective if farmers can receive benefits from the disbursement and use of credit to meet farming activities, and one of which is increasing productivity.. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of KUR for sugarcane farmers in West Java Province. This research uses a quantitative descriptive analysis method using scoring. The results showed that the average score of timely credit effectiveness was 103%.. The timeliness score is greater than 100%, meaning that the average credit is on time. Credit is already available before farmers start farming, so that on average, all farming activities can be carried out on time, except for the procurement of fertilizer and cultivation costs. The average accuracy of the amount of credit with the realization of expenditure is 85%, below 100%. This means that credit for the procurement of inputs and farming activities is still not effective, especially for the amount of fertilizer and herbicides. The level of effectiveness of sugarcane farmer credit is at a score of 87.3% to 106.1%, with an average farmer credit effectiveness rate of 94%. This means that, on average, farmers have credit that is ineffective. Most farmers are late in receiving credit disbursements, and the amount of credit received is less than their farming needs. }, issn = {2621-9778}, pages = {814--828} doi = {10.14710/agrisocionomics.v9i3.26994}, url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/agrisocionomics/article/view/26994} }
Refworks Citation Data :
People's Business Credit (KUR) is a credit scheme intended for farmers since 2000. The availability of credit for business actors is used to increase capital. However, not all credit obtained can be categorized as effective. Credit is effective if farmers can receive benefits from the disbursement and use of credit to meet farming activities, and one of which is increasing productivity.. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of KUR for sugarcane farmers in West Java Province. This research uses a quantitative descriptive analysis method using scoring. The results showed that the average score of timely credit effectiveness was 103%.. The timeliness score is greater than 100%, meaning that the average credit is on time. Credit is already available before farmers start farming, so that on average, all farming activities can be carried out on time, except for the procurement of fertilizer and cultivation costs. The average accuracy of the amount of credit with the realization of expenditure is 85%, below 100%. This means that credit for the procurement of inputs and farming activities is still not effective, especially for the amount of fertilizer and herbicides. The level of effectiveness of sugarcane farmer credit is at a score of 87.3% to 106.1%, with an average farmer credit effectiveness rate of 94%. This means that, on average, farmers have credit that is ineffective. Most farmers are late in receiving credit disbursements, and the amount of credit received is less than their farming needs.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Starting from 2021, the author(s) whose article is published in the Agrisocionomics journal attain the copyright for their article. By submitting the manuscript to Agrisocionomics, the author(s) agree with this policy. No special document approval is required.
The author(s) guarantee that:
The author(s) retain all rights to the published work, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:
If the article was prepared jointly by more than one author, each author submitting the manuscript warrants that they have been given permission by all co-authors to agree to copyright and license notices (agreements) on their behalf, and agree to notify the co-authors of the terms of this policy. Agrisocionomics will not be held responsible for anything that may arise because of the writer's internal dispute. Agrisocionomics will only communicate with correspondence authors.
Authors should also understand that once published, their articles (and any additional files, including data sets, and analysis/computation data) will become publicly available. The license of published articles (and additional data) will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently featured on the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Agrisocionomics allows users to copy, distribute, display and perform work under license. Users need to attribute the author(s) and Agrisocionomics to distribute works in journals and other publication media. Unless otherwise stated, the author(s) is a public entity as soon as the article is published.
View My Stats