skip to main content

The Role Of Gendered Livelihoods In Shaping Cattle Management In Smallholder Farming Households In Nusa Tenggara Barat

*Baiq Yulfia Elsadewi Yanuartati scopus publons  -  Dept. Socioeconomic, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Mataram, Jl. Majapahit No.62, Gomong, Kec. Selaparang, Kota Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Bar. 83115, Indonesia
Janet Reid scopus  -  School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University. Palmerston North, New Zealand
David Gray  -  School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University. Palmerston North, New Zealand
Open Access Copyright 2025 Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study explored how gender roles influenced the management of cattle farming in smallholder households in Nusa Tenggara Barat (NTB), Indonesia. In this setting, cattle were not only a key source of income but also held cultural value. However, traditional social norms still tended to limit women’s involvement in cattle-related activities. Guided by Livelihoods Theory, this research examined how gendered roles shaped labor roles, access to resources, and decision-making within household cattle management. Using a qualitative case study approach, the study drew on semi-structured interviews with 25 men and women from cattle-farming households in NTB. The data were analyzed thematically to identify patterns in gender roles, control over resources, and access to support systems, which shaped decisions on cattle. The findings suggested that patriarchal norms continued to restrict women’s access to productive assets, limiting their participation in cattle management. While cattle served as a form of household savings, women often relied on them for investment, especially when they lacked access to credit due to limited ownership of collateral. Meanwhile, men were often seen as more mobile and capable of managing cattle, particularly bulls, while women were more involved with small livestock such as poultry and goats. Women were also commonly excluded from livestock farmer groups, which served as key gateways to government livestock support and grants. This exclusion reinforced gender gaps in cattle ownership, economic opportunities, and access to public agricultural resources. The study highlighted the need for more inclusive approaches to support women’s roles in cattle farming and rural livelihoods.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: cattle farming, gender norms, livelihoods
Funding: Mataram University; Massey University

Article Metrics:

  1. Agarwal, B. 2018. Gender equality, food security and the sustainable development goals. 34, 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.07.002
  2. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat. 2024. Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat Dalam Angka 2024. https://ntb.bps.go.id/id/publication/2024/02/28/375b8367273e8c7900e8174e/provinsi-nusa-tenggara-barat-dalam-angka-2024.html
  3. Bain, C., Ransom, E., & Halimatusa’diah, I. 2018. ‘Weak winners’ of Women’s empowerment: The gendered effects of dairy livestock assets on time poverty in Uganda. Journal Of Rural Studies, 61, 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.03.004
  4. Chambers, R., & Gordon, R. C. 1992. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century. Institute of Development Studies (UK). https://www.ids.ac.uk/download.php?file=files/Dp296.pdf
  5. Conway, G. 2022. Exploring Sustainable Livelihoods. Revolutionizing Development: Reflections on the Work of Robert Chambers, 85–92. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003298632-10
  6. Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan. 2009. Blue Print NTB Bumi Sejuta Sapi. https://kikp-pertanian.id/ditjenpkh/opac/pencarian-sederhana?action=pencarianSederhana&ruas=Pengarang&bahan=Semua Jenis Bahan&katakunci=TGH. M. Zainul Majdi, MA
  7. Doss, C., Meinzen-Dick, R., Quisumbing, A., & Theis, S. 2018. Women in agriculture: Four myths. Global Food Security, 16(July 2017), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2017.10.001
  8. Glesne, C. 2016. Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction. https://www.amazon.com/Becoming-Qualitative-Researchers-Introduction-5th/dp/0133859398
  9. Hillenbrand, Emily, Miruka, & Maureen. 2019. Gender and social norms in Agriculture: A review. In 2019 Annual trends and outlook report: Gender equality in rural Africa: From commitments to outcomes, eds. Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela; and Njuki, Jemimah. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)., 11–31. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/147063
  10. Kabeer, N. 2020. Women’s Empowerment and Economic Development: A Feminist Critique of Storytelling Practices in “Randomista” Economics. Feminist Economics, 26(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2020.1743338
  11. Kanter, R. M. 2017. Power failure in management circuits. In Leadership perspectives (pp. 281-290). https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315250601-21/power-failure-management-circuits-rosabeth-moss-kanter
  12. Kristjanson, P., WaTers-Bayer, A., Johnson, N., Tipilda, A., Njuki, J., Baltenweck, I., Grace, D., & MacMillan. (n.d.). Livestock and women’s livelihoods. Gender in Agriculture: Closing the Knowledge Gap. 2014, 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8616-4_9
  13. Lawless, S., Cohen, P., Mcdougall, C., Orirana, G., Siota, F., & Doyle, K. 2019. Gender norms and relations: implications for agency in coastal livelihoods. SpringerS Lawless, P Cohen, C McDougall, G Orirana, F Siota, K Doyle, 8(3), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-019-00147-0
  14. Markel, E., Ge Ttliffe, E., Jones, L., Miller, E., Gettliffe, E., Jones, E., & Emily Miller, L. 2016. The social norms factor: How gendered social norms influence how we empower women in market systems development. https://beamexchange.org/media/filer_public/ca/ca/caca2590-5067-4579-83a9-be2ebeb30237/social_norms_factor_report.pdf
  15. Matiwane, M. B. M. M. A. 2016. Sustainable Livelihood for Rural Areas. Rural Areas - Development and Transformations, 11(tourism), 13. https://www.intechopen.com/books/advanced-biometric-technologies/liveness-detection-in-biometrics
  16. Meinzen-Dick, R., Quisumbing, A., Doss, C., & Theis, S. 2017. Women’s Land Rights as a Pathway to Poverty Reduction A Framework and Review of Available Evidence. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.10.009
  17. Mersha, A. A., & Laerhoven, F. Van. 2016. A gender approach to understanding the differentiated impact of barriers to adaptation: responses to climate change in rural Ethiopia. 16(6), 1701–1713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0921-z
  18. Miles, H. M., & Saldana, J. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=p0wXBAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=id#v=onepage&q&f=false
  19. Natarajan, N., Newsham, A., Rigg, J., & Suhardiman, D. 2022. A sustainable livelihoods framework for the 21st century. World Development, 155:105898. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105898
  20. Petesch, P., & Badstue, L. 2020. Gender norms and poverty dynamics in 32 villages of South Asia. SpringerP Petesch, L BadstueInternational Journal of Community Well-Being, 3(3), 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-019-00047-5
  21. Quisumbing, A. R., & Baulch, B. 2013. Assets and poverty traps in rural Bangladesh. The Journal of Development Studies. 49(7), 898–916. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2013.785524
  22. Scoones, I. 2015. Sustainable livelihoods and rural development. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/IanScoones/publication/326954304_Livelihoods_Perspectives_A_Brief_History/links/653618cb1d6e8a707045e2b9/Livelihoods-Perspectives-A-Brief-History.pdf
  23. Spangler, K., & Christie, M. E. 2020. Renegotiating gender roles and cultivation practices in the Nepali mid-hills: unpacking the feminization of agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values, 37(2), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10460-019-09997-0/TABLES/2
  24. Villano, R. A., Koomson, I., Thei, S., Taqiuddin, M., Prameswari, F., Fachry, A., & Burrow, H. 2024. Women’s empowerment in integrated cattle-farming systems in Indonesia. Applied Economics. 1–16. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2024.2364090
  25. Yanuartati, B. Y. E. 2021. Saving and social functions of cattle in smallholder livelihoods: A multiple case study of cattle management in NTB, Indonesia [Massey University, Palmerston North New Zealand]. http://hdl.handle.net/10179/16588
  26. Yanuartati, B. Y. E. 2023. Understanding the framework of sustainable rural livelihoods in the implementation of market-led rural development. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 3800–3807. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.3572

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.