DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/agrisocionomics.v9i2.24197

The Role and Performance of Farmer Group in Organic Vegetable Business

Mubarokah Mubarokah  -  Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur, Jl. Rungkut Madya, Gunung Anyar, Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 60294, Indonesia
Noor Rizkiyah  -  Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur, Jl. Rungkut Madya, Gunung Anyar, Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 60294, Indonesia
Wahyu Santoso orcid scopus  -  Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur, Jl. Rungkut Madya, Gunung Anyar, Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 60294, Indonesia
*Putri Nurmalita Sari orcid  -  Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur, Jl. Rungkut Madya, Gunung Anyar, Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 60294, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2025 Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Natural substances are used instead of synthetic chemicals in organic farming, which eschews the use of synthetic insecticides, fertilizers, and plant growth regulators. The purpose of this study is to (1) Identify the role of farmer groups in the development of organic vegetable businesses; and (2) analyze factors that affect the performance of organic vegetable farmer groups.   Technique sampling set is 40 farmers Respondents were selected purposively, taking into account capacity and capability.  Qualitative descriptive analysis and SEM-PLS, two data analysis techniques, are being applied. The findings of this study demonstrate how well-suited a farmer organization to play a role in organic vegetable production from upstream to downstream.  External factor variables have a positive effect on performance variables but are not significant. This is due to the relatively low capacity of farmer group members due to low education. On the other hand, land size, member involvement, production facilities and member access all have an influence on community performance.  The influence of community competence on performance reveals that the initial sample value, 1.146, is positive. This value indicates that there is a favorable association between the competency variable and community performance. However, when linked to the role of the group in terms of marketing access, there is still a need for additional knowledge, skills, and farmers are still very dependent on community leaders for the sale of crops, which has an impact on the fighting power of farmers.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: organic agriculture; performance of farmer group; role

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Risk Mitigation Of Rice Production In Pringsewu District REVEALING THE POTENTIAL OF INDONESIAN COFFEE: ANALYSIS OF COMPETITIVENESS IN THE INTERNATIONAL MARKET The Decision Of Micro And Small Industries To Implement Certification And The Impact On Industrial Performance More recent articles
  1. Alotaibi, B. A., Yoder, E., Brennan, M. A., & Kassem, H. S. (2021). Perception of organic farmers towards organic agriculture and role of extension. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 28(5), 2980–2986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.02.037
  2. Anil, B., Tonts, M., & Siddique, K. H. M. (2015). Strengthening the performance of farming system groups: perspectives from a Communities of Practice framework application. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 22(3), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2014.1003153
  3. Ashari, A. (2016). Optimization of Agricultural Sector Program Credit Policies in Indonesia. Center for Socioeconomic Analysis and Agricultural Policy
  4. Chavas, J.-P., & Nauges, C. (2020). Uncertainty, Learning, and Technology Adoption in Agriculture. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 42(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13003
  5. Ghozali, I. (2018). Multivariate Analysis Application with IBM SPSS 25 Program. Diponegoro University Publishing Agency
  6. Hilmiati, N. (2020). Farmer Group Institution’s Typology and Agricultural Innovation Implementation Sustainability. SOCA: Agricultural Socioeconomic Journal, 14(2), 204– 216. https://doi.org/10.24843/SOCA.2020.v14.i02.p02
  7. Janah, R., Eddy, B., & Dalmiyatun, T. (2017). Land Function Transfer Agriculture and Its Impact on Population Life in Sayung District, Demak Regency. Agrisocionomics, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.14710/agrisocionomics.v1i1.1629
  8. Maulana, I. (2013). The Relationship Between Community Competency Potential and Community Capacity in Farming Groups in Lembang District, West Bandung Regency. Journal of Urban and Regional Planning, 24(3), 189–202
  9. Methamontri, Y., Tsusaka, T. W., Zulfiqar, F., Yukongdi, V., & Datta, A. (2022). Factors influencing participation in collective marketing through organic rice farmer groups in northeast Thailand. Heliyon, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11421
  10. Mgomezulu, W. R., Machira, K., Edriss, A.-K., & Pangapanga-Phiri, I. (2023). Modeling farmers’ adoption decisions of sustainable agricultural practices under varying agro- ecological conditions: A new perspective. Innovation and Green Development, 2(1), 100036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2023.100036
  11. Nurokhman, A. (2019). Urban Sprawl in Indonesia and Implementation Failure Sustainable Food Agricultural Land Protection Policy. Planning/BPN National Seminar
  12. Pratiwi, I. (2019). Efek Program Pisa terhadap Kurikulum di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 4(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v4i1.1157
  13. Purwantini, T., & Sunarsih, N. (2020). Organic Agriculture: Concept, Performance, Prospects, and Constraints. Agro-Economy Research Forum, 37(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.21082/fae.v37n2.2019.127-142
  14. Putri, ED. (2018). Farmer Institutions and Their Role in Development Agriculture, Cyber Extension. Payakumbuh City Locality Material, Sumatra
  15. Rahim, A., & Hastuti, D. (2005). Horticulture Agribusiness Management System. Makassar State University
  16. Regulation of the Minister of Agriculture on Guidelines Development of Farmer Groups and Association of Farmer Groups, (2013)
  17. Rijali, A. (2018). Qualitative data analysis. Journal of Alhadharah, 17(33), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.18592/alhadharah.v17i33.2374
  18. Roosganda, E. (2016). Empowering Women Supports Gender Strategy Mainstreaming in Agricultural Development Policy in Rural Areas. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 25(2), 126. https://doi.org/10.21082/fae.v25n2.2007.126-135
  19. Santoso, S. (2014). Basic Concepts and SEM Applications with Amos 22. Elex Media Komputindo
  20. Slimi, C., Prost, M., Cerf, M., & Prost, L. (2021). Exchanges among farmers’ collectives in support of sustainable agriculture: From review to reconceptualization. Journal of Rural Studies, 83(July 2020), 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.019
  21. Sugiyono, S. (2017). Business Research Methods; Quantitative, Qualitative and R&D. Alfabeta
  22. Supriadi, H., & Roosganda, E. (2007). Innovation and Investment Development Policy Infrastructure for Increasing Participation and Income of Farmers Study Case: Blora District, Central Java. Journal Research and Development, 19(3), 106–111
  23. Susilowati, S., & Hery, S. (2016). Phenomenon of Aging Farmers and Decreased Energy Youth Work and Its Implications for Agricultural Development Policy. Agro-Economy Research Forum, 34(1), 35–55
  24. Syukur, M., & Melati, M. (2016). Development of Indonesian Organic Vegetables. IPB Press
  25. Tri Bastuti P. dan Suniarsih, (2020) Organic Agriculture: Concept, Performance, Prospect, and Constraints, Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, Vol. 37 No. 2, December 2019: 127-142, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/fae.v37n2.2019.127-142
  26. Utaranakorn, P., & Yasunobu, K. (2016). The mutual influence of managerial ability and social networks of farmers on participation in an organic vegetable group in Khon Kaen province, Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 37(3), 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.08.001

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.