DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/agrisocionomics.v8i2.22722

DEMOGRAPHIC TARGETING OF USERS IN MOBILE APPLICATIONS FOR LIVESTOCK DIGITAL MARKETING AMONG SMALLHOLDER CATTLE FARMERS

*Agung Triatmojo orcid scopus  -  Department of Livestock Socio-economics, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
Mujtahidah Anggriani Ummul Muzayyanah  -  Department of Livestock Socio-economics, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
Suci Paramitasari Syahlani  -  Department of Livestock Socio-economics, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
Budi Guntoro  -  Department of Livestock Socio-economics, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2024 Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Several livestock diseases leading to high mortality rates among animals have raised concerns about a potential food crisis in Indonesia. To prevent further spread of these diseases, access to livestock sheds has been restricted. This situation has highlighted the importance of developing alternative marketing channels to facilitate livestock trade. The present study investigates the demographic factors that influence farmers' interest in adopting mobile applications for digital livestock marketing in the Special Region of Yogyakarta. The data for this research was collected from a stratified random sample of 968 respondents across four regions. Prior to the interviews, farmers were provided with an introduction and given the opportunity to experience the mobile applications firsthand. The data analysis employed descriptive statistics, non-parametric analysis, and a logistic regression model. The results indicated a significant (p < 0.05) association between variables such as the farmer's age, educational level, women's decision-making power, farming revenue, cattle ownership, farming experience, and interest in using mobile applications for livestock digital marketing. However, no distinction in adoption interest was observed between farmers who were members of agricultural groups and those who were not. These findings have significant methodological implications, as they require independent interviewing among member farmer groups. This study suggests that developers of mobile applications for livestock digital marketing should consider the lack of digital literacy among farmers as a crucial factor influencing their interest in adopting new technologies. Addressing the digital literacy gap could increase the adoption and effective use of these applications within the farming community.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: cattle farmer, digital marketing, demographic, farmer group, FMD

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
THE EFFECT OF RICE PRICE ON THE INDONESIAN INFLATION IN A NEW INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE DEMOGRAPHIC TARGETING OF USERS IN MOBILE APPLICATIONS FOR LIVESTOCK DIGITAL MARKETING AMONG SMALLHOLDER CATTLE FARMERS THE EFFECT OF OIL PALM EMPTY FRUIT BUNCHES (EFB) COMPOST AND N, P, K FERTILIZERS ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF LOWLAND RICE (Oryza sativa L.) More recent articles
  1. Abdul-Rahaman, A., & Abdulai, A. 2020. Farmer groups, collective marketing and smallholder farm performance in rural Ghana. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 10(5): 511–527. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-07-2019-0095
  2. Abebe, A., & Mammo Cherinet, Y. 2019. Factors Affecting the Use of Information and Communication Technologies for Cereal Marketing in Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural & Food Information, 20(1): 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496505.2018.1438290
  3. Aker, J. C. 2010. Information from Markets Near and Far: Mobile Phones and Agricultural Markets in Niger. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(3): 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.2.3.46
  4. Aker, J. C., Ghosh, I., & Burrell, J. 2016. The promise (and pitfalls) of ICT for agriculture initiatives. Agricultural Economics, 47(S1): 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12301
  5. Asa, A. U., & Uwem, A. C. 2017. Utilization of Mobile Phones for Agricultural Purposes by Farmers in Itu Area, Nigeria. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 13(19): 395. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n19p395
  6. Atibioke, O. A., Ogunlade, I., Abiodun, A. A., Ogundele, B. A., Omodara, M. A., & Ade, A. R. 2012. Effects of Farmers’ Demographic Factors on the Adoption of Grain Storage Technologies Developed by Nigerian Stored Products Research Institute (NSPRI): A case study of selected villages in Ilorin West LGA of Kwara State (Vol. 2, Issue 6). www.iiste.org
  7. Basuki, R. S., Isnaini, M. F., Rozi, Poermadjaja, B., & Saptarini. 2020. Penyidikan Kasus Penyakit pada Sapi Suspect PMK di Kabupaten Pamekasan tahun 2019. Penyidikan Penyakit Hewan, 115–122
  8. Baumüller, H. 2015. Agricultural Innovation and Service Delivery through Mobile Phones Analyses in Kenya
  9. Chuang, J.-H., Wang, J.-H., & Liang, C. 2020. Implementation of Internet of Things depends on intention: young farmers’ willingness to accept innovative technology. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 23(2): 253–266. https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2019.0121
  10. Chukwunonso, F., & Tukur, A. 2012. Problems and prospects of adopting ICT in agriculture: some comments. African Journal of Agricultural Research and Development, 5(3): 39–47
  11. Conci, M., Pianesi, F., & Zancanaro, M. 2009. Useful, Social and Enjoyable: Mobile Phone Adoption by Older People (pp. 63–76). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03655-2_7
  12. Costopoulou, C., Ntaliani, M., & Karetsos, S. 2016. Studying Mobile Apps for Agriculture. Journal of Mobile Computing & Application, 3(6): 44–49. https://doi.org/10.9790/0050-03064449
  13. Diaz, A. C., Sasaki, N., Tsusaka, T. W., & Szabo, S. 2021. Factors affecting farmers’ willingness to adopt a mobile app in the marketing of bamboo products. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 11: 200056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2021.200056
  14. Feryanto, F., & Rosiana, N. 2021. Penggunaan Telepon Seluler untuk Pemasaran Serta Dampaknya Terhadap Kesejahteraan Petani. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 20(01): 25–40. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.20.01.25-40
  15. Issahaku, H., Abu, B. M., & Nkegbe, P. K. 2018. Does the Use of Mobile Phones by Smallholder Maize Farmers Affect Productivity in Ghana? Journal of African Business, 19(3): 302–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2017.1416215
  16. Jaji, M. F. O., Abanigbe, S. A., & Abass, B. O. 2018. Mobile Phone as an extension tool among female agricultural practitioners in Lagos State Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 21(3): 66. https://doi.org/10.4314/jae.v21i3.7
  17. Kim, J., Shah, P., Gaskell, J. C., Prasann, A., & Luthra, A. 2020. Scaling Up Disruptive Agricultural Technologies in Africa. World Bank, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1522-5
  18. Krisnawati, I., Ubaidi, I. A., Rais, H., & Batu, R. L. 2019. Strategi Digital Marketing dalam Perdagangan Hasil Tani untuk Meningkatkan Pendapatan Kabupaten Karawang. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Global Masa Kini, 10(2): 70–75. https://doi.org/10.36982/jiegmk.v10i2.838
  19. Makini, F., Mose, L., Kamau, G., Mulinge, W., Salasya, B., Akuku, B., & Makelo, M. 2020. The Status of ICT Infrastructure, Innovative Environment and ICT4AG Services in Agriculture. Food and Nutrition in Kenya, 5(11): 75
  20. Malabayabas, M. L., & Mishra, A. K. 2022. Assessing inverse relationship in joint farm decision-making households: An empirical evidence from Eastern India. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.1000156
  21. Meijer, S. S., Catacutan, D., Ajayi, O. C., Sileshi, G. W., & Nieuwenhuis, M. 2015. The role of knowledge, attitudes and perceptions in the uptake of agricultural and agroforestry innovations among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 13(1): 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2014.912493
  22. Miine, L. K., Akorsu, A. D., Boampong, O., & Bukari, S. 2023. Drivers and intensity of adoption of digital agricultural services by smallholder farmers in Ghana. Heliyon, 9(12): e23023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23023
  23. Mittal, S., & Mehar, M. 2016. Socio-economic Factors Affecting Adoption of Modern Information and Communication Technology by Farmers in India: Analysis Using Multivariate Probit Model. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 22(2): 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2014.997255
  24. Mponela, P., Villamor, G. B., Snapp, S., Tamene, L., Le, Q. B., & Borgemeister, C. 2021. The role of women empowerment and labour dependency on adoption of integrated soil fertility management in Malawi. Soil Use and Management, 37(2): 390–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12627
  25. Poushter, J. 2016. Smartphone Ownership and Internet Usage Continues to Climb in Emerging Economies. Pew Research Center
  26. Qiang, C. Z., Chew Kuek, S., Dymond, A., & Esselaar, S. 2012. Mobile Applications for Agriculture and Rural Development
  27. Rahmasari, L. F., Faturokhman, M., & Kurniawan, F. A. 2022. Analisis Kepuasan Konsumen pada Penerapan Pemasaran Digital untuk Komoditas Peternakan. Jurnal Sains Terapan, 12(1): 54–65. https://doi.org/10.29244/jstsv.12.1.54-65
  28. Rompaey, V. Van, Roe, K., & Struys, K. 2002. Children’s Influence on Internet Access at Home: Adoption and use in the family context. Information, Communication & Society, 5(2): 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180210130770
  29. Rosário, J., Madureira, L., Marques, C., & Silva, R. 2022. Understanding Farmers’ Adoption of Sustainable Agriculture Innovations: A Systematic Literature Review. Agronomy, 12(11), 2879. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112879
  30. Sansamur, C., Arjkumpa, O., Charoenpanyanet, A., & Punyapornwithaya, V. 2020. Determination of Risk Factors Associated with Foot and Mouth Disease Outbreaks in Dairy Farms in Chiang Mai Province, Northern Thailand. Animals, 10(3): 512. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030512
  31. Terras, M. M., & Ramsay, J. 2016. Family Digital Literacy Practices and Children’s Mobile Phone Use. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01957
  32. Triatmojo, A., Qui, N. H., Sayed, Y. B. El, Muzayyanah, M. A. U., Syahlani, S. P., & Guntoro, B. 2024.Technological Acceptance of Cattle Farmers in Mobile Applications for Livestock Digital Marketing. Bulletin of Animal Science, 48(2): 153–161. https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v48i2.92075
  33. Widiati, R. 2015. Developing Beef Cattle Industry at Smallholders to Support Beef Self-Sufficiency. Indonesian Bulletin of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.14334/wartazoa.v24i4.1090
  34. Yuantari, M. C., Kurniadi, A., & Ngatindriatun. 2016. Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi untuk Meningkatkan Pemasaran Hasil Pertanian di Desa Curut Kecamatan Penawangan Kabupaten Grobogan Jawa Tengah. Techno.COM, 15(1)
  35. Zainuddin. 2022. Kesiagaan Darurat Veteriner Indonesia Seri Penyakit Mulut Dan Kuku. Minister of Agriculture of Indonesia

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.