skip to main content

LIVELIHOOD STRATEGIES AND LIVELIHOOD SYSTEM OF DRYLAND FARMERS

Rina Nuryati  -  Departement of Agribusiness, faculty of Agriculture, University of Siliwangi, Jl. Siliwangi Kota Tasikmalaya, Indonesia
*Faqihuddin Faqihuddin orcid scopus  -  Departement of Agribusiness, faculty of Agriculture, University of Siliwangi, Jl. Siliwangi Kota Tasikmalaya, Indonesia
Cici Aulia Permata Bunda  -  Departement of Agribusiness, faculty of Agriculture, University of Siliwangi, Jl. Siliwangi Kota Tasikmalaya, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2025 Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Dry land has great potential to support increased agricultural production, but its status is critical and farmers generally have weak capabilities (especially on capital). There is also a practice that destroys the environment and low technology adoption resulting in low income. Therefore, farmers are required to think rationally so that their needs are met through a livelihood strategy that is not limited to livelihoods but rather a livelihood strategy through the use of agricultural development capital. This research was conducted with the aim of knowing the livelihood strategies and livelihood systems of dry land farmers. The research method used a survey in two selected sub-districts, namely Cibalong and Karangnunggal, Tasikmalaya Regency, with a population of 3,684 dry land farmers, then the sample was taken by proportional simple random sampling, as many as 44 farmers from Parung Village, Cibalong Sub-District and 59 farmers from Cikupa Village, Karangnunggal Sub-District, so that the total sample is 103 people. The research was conducted from May to July 2023. Farmers' livelihood strategies were analyzed by the income and expenditure structure of farmer households and the purchasing power of farmers. Meanwhile, the farmer's livelihood system was analyzed descriptively in relation to the farmer's access to natural resource capital, economic capital, social capital, human capital and physical capital. The results showed that the strategy for fulfilling the needs of farmer households was carried out by seeking income from agriculture and non-agriculture. The average income of farmers from farming is IDR 17,793,227.18 per year and from non-agriculture is an average of IDR. 3,893,689.32 per year. So that the average total income of farmer households per year is IDR 21,686,916.50 or IDR 1,807,243.03 per month. Expenditures for farmer households IDR. 16,590,417.48 per year (for agricultural businesses IDR. 8,909,495.15 and for non-agricultural businesses IDR. 7,680,922.33 per year). As many as 36 percent of farming families are categorized as food insecure, while others are categorized as food secure. Based on the power value, all farming families are able to meet their expenses. The results of the analysis of farmers' livelihood systems related to capital factors (natural capital, economic capital, socio-cultural capital, human resource capital and infrastructure capital) are needed to support farmers' livelihood systems through sustainable Integrated Polyculture Plantation Farming (IPPF) management. 88.36 percent of respondents agreed and strongly agreed that natural capital is capital that supports farmers' livelihood systems through sustainable IPPF. Meanwhile, 70.10 percent agreed and strongly agreed that economic capital is capital that supports farmers' livelihood systems through sustainable IPPF management.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Dry land; Livelihood Strategies, Livelihood System, Farmers
Funding: Big Thank to the Rector, Chair of the Institute for Research and Community Service, and Dean of the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Siliwangi for funding support and other facilities to support the research activities that we are carrying out in the

Article Metrics:

  1. Abdurachman, A., Dariah, A., and Mulyani, A. (2008). Strategy and Technology for managing dry land to support national food supply. Journal of Agricultural Research and Development, 27, 43-49
  2. Beets, W.C. (1982). Multiple Cropping and Tropical Farming System. Hampshire: Gower Publ Co. Ltd
  3. Central Bureau of Statistics. (2010). Statistics of Indonesia. Jakarta: BPS
  4. Chambers, R and Conway, GR. (1991). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts For the 21st Century. IDS Discussion Paper No. 296. IDS. Sussex
  5. Dharmawan AH. (2007). Livelihood Systems and Rural Livelihoods: Views of Livelihood Sociology of the West School and the Bogor School. Bogor: Bogor Agricultural Institute
  6. Ellis, F. (2000). Rural Livelihood and Diversity in Developing Countries. London (UK): Oxford University Press
  7. Haeruman, M. (2013). Building Agricultural Sovereignty: Alternative Perspectives to Realize Sustainable Competitiveness. Bandung: Department of Social Economics, Faculty of Agriculture UNPAD
  8. Idjudin, A.A and Marwanto, S. (2008). Dryland Management Reform to Support Food Self-Sufficiency. Journal of Land Resources, 2, 115-125
  9. Indriyanto. (2006). Forest Ecology 1st printing. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara
  10. Irianto, R. (2010). Development of Agroforestry Pattern People's Gardens (People's Forest) Increasing Farmers' Income and Environmentally Friendly in Kespahiang District. Bengkulu Province: Report on the Potential for Cocoa Floating in Kespahiang Regency
  11. Kokoye, S.E.H, Yabi, J.A, Tovignan, D.S, Yegbemey,R.N, Ernst-August Nuppenau, E-A. (2013). Simultaneous Modelling of the Determinants of the Partial Inputs Productivity in the Municipality of Banikoara, Northern Benin. Journal of Agricultural systems, 122
  12. Mariyanto, J., Dwiastuti, R. and Hanani, N. (2015). Household Economic Model of Dry Land Agriculture in Karanganyar Regency, Central Java Province. Habitat Journal, 26, 108-118
  13. Nurinda. (2006). Agroecosystem Management in Pest Control. Perspective Journal, 5 ,78 – 85
  14. Nurmanaf, A.R. (2006). The Role of the External Agricultural Sector on Opportunities and Income in Dryland-Based Rural Areas. Journal of SOCA, 8, 1-13
  15. Pakpahan, A. S. (1993). Food Security for Low-Income Communities. Bogor: Monograph Series No. 14 Bogor Agricultural Social Economic Research Center
  16. Pasandaran, E., Syam, M., and Las, I. (2011). Degradation of Natural Resources: A Threat to National Food Self-sufficiency. Bogor: IPB Press
  17. Pasaribu, S.M, Suradisastra, K, Sayaka, B., and Dariah, A. (2010). Control and Recovery of Agricultural Ecosystem Degradation in the Book Reversing the Tendency of Degradation of Land and Water Resources. Jakarta: Agricultural Research and Development Agency, Ministry of Agriculture
  18. Purnomo, Agustina, and Dharmawan, A. (2007). Transformation of Rural Livelihood Structures: The Growth of “Constructed Social Capital” in the Collaborative Forest Management Scheme in Kuningan District. Sodality: Journal of Rural Sociology. 1, 193-216. https://doi.org/10.22500/sodality.v1i2.5931
  19. Rachmat, M. (2013). Mid-Term Development of West Java and Prospects for Development of Dry Land. Agricultural Research and Development Agency. Jakarta: PP No. 2 of 2005 concerning RTRW
  20. Scott, J.C. (1983). The Moral Economy of Peasants: Upheaval and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. LP3ES: Jakarta
  21. Singarimbun, M. (2006). Survey Research Methodology. Jakarta:LP3ES
  22. Sudana, W., (2007). Final Report on Rural Development Studies. Bogor: Agency for Agricultural Research and Development
  23. Suwarto, S and Anantannyu, S. (2012). Participation Model of Dryland Farmers in Land Conservation. Journal of Development Economics, 13, 218-234
  24. Thamrongwarangkul, A. (2001). For Out Thailand. Annual Report on Sustainable Community Development For Good Livelihoods And Environmental Project. Khon Kaen University
  25. Utami, SR. (2003). Prospects of Agroforestry Research and Development in Indonesia. World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF Southeast Asia)

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.