skip to main content

SUSTAINABILITY OF OSING TRIBE FARMING IN KEMIREN VILLAGE, BANYUWANGI

*Rita Parmawati orcid  -  Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, East Java, Indonesia, Indonesia
Indah Yanti  -  Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, East Java, Indonesia, Indonesia
Fahdynia Karnira Gunawan  -  Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, East Java, Indonesia, Indonesia
Nadhea Oktaviantina Rahmawati  -  Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, East Java, Indonesia, Indonesia
Fadhil Muhamad Ashari  -  Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, East Java, Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2024 Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Sustainable agricultural development offers benefits and environmental concerns, but challenges arise in land conversion processes in today's age. Kemiren Village, also known as Osing Village, is where most people are farmers. Rice production and farmers' income are decreasing yearly due to several factors that cause the importance of sustainable development planning. Based on these problems, this study aims to analyze the index and sustainability status of farming in Kemiran Village, Glagah District, Banyuwangi. This research instrument was carried out using observation, structured interviews, and distributed questionnaires, and it was analyzed by multi-dimensional scaling (MDS). The reliability test confirms all dimensions are reliable for sustainable status testing, the availability of rice pest predators influenced the ecological sustainability index value, the certification of rice seeds used, and the application of pesticides following recommendations. The economic sustainability index had savings, adequate farming equipment, and infrastructure facilities in the agricultural sector. Savings, adequate farming equipment, and adequate infrastructure facilities in the agricultural sector influenced the economic sustainability index. The sustainability status of sustainable agriculture needs to be considered with each dimension: ecological dimension 33.51, economic dimension 32.00, and social dimension 40.00 so that it is categorized as less sustainable because it is in the range of 25.01 - 50.00. MDS analysis shows that the error factor in each attribute was relatively small, in the differences in each respondent's assessment of the attributes studied, errors in entering data, and missing data.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: land conversion, multi-dimensional scaling, osing Tribe, sustainable agriculture, sustainable development

Article Metrics:

  1. Agustina, E., and W. R. Lina. 2020. Analisis Perhitungan Harga Pokok Produksi Pada Pabrik Tahu Makmur Dengan Metode Full Costing. Research in Accounting Journal (RAJ), 1(1): 140-154. https://doi.org/10.37385/raj.v1i1.98
  2. Afandhi, A. 2020. Rice Farming with Application of Integrated Pest Management (IPM): Analysis of Social and Economic Sustainability (Case Study in Besur Village, Lamongan District). Habitat, 31(2): 109-114. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.habitat.2020.031.2.13
  3. Arulogun, O. T., O. N. Akande, A. T. Akindele, and T. A. Badmus. 2020. Survey dataset on open and distance learning students’ intention to use social media and emerging technologies for online facilitation. Data in brief, 31: 105929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105929
  4. De Corato, U. 2020. Towards new soil management strategies for improving soil quality and ecosystem services in sustainable agriculture: Editorial overview. Sustainability, 12(22), 9398. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229398
  5. Djunaedy, A. 2009. Pengaruh Jenis dan Dosis Pupuk Bokashi Terhadap Pertumbuhan dan Hasil Kacang Panjang (Vigna sinensis L.) Jurnal Agrovigor, 2(1): 42-46. https://doi.org/10.21107/agrovigor.v2i1.240
  6. Falo, M. 2023. Model Komunikasi Program Upaya Khusus Tanaman Jagung di Pulau Timor. PT. Pusat Literasi Dunia
  7. Fan, S., E. E. Cho, T. Meng, and C. Rue. 2021. How to prevent and cope with coincidence of risks to the global food system. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46: 601-623. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-020844
  8. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2017. The future of food and agriculture – Trends and challenges. Rome
  9. Fauzi, D., I. Martadona. 2019. Strategi Pemasaran Padi Organik di Kelompok Tani Padi Rimbun Kota Padang Organic Rice Marketing Strategy on Rimbun Paddy Farmer Group in Padang City.. PANGAN, 28(1): 35 – 44
  10. Hakim, L. 2014. Etnobotani dan manajemen kebun-pekarangan rumah: ketahanan pangan, kesehatan dan agrowisata. Selaras. Malang
  11. Hartono, J. 2018. Metode Pengumpulan dan Teknik Analisis Data. Penerbit Andi
  12. Jogiyanto Hartono, M. (Ed.). 2018. Metoda pengumpulan dan teknik analisis data. Penerbit Andi
  13. Kavanagh P. 2001, Rapid Appraisal of Fisheries (Rapfish) Project: Rapfish Software Description (for Microsoft Excel). University of British Columbia, Vancouver
  14. Mahida, M. 2020. Pendekatan Multidimensional Scaling untuk Penilaian Status Keberlanjutan ATCS Kota Pintar Semarang. Warta Penelitian Perhubungan, 32(2): 103-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.25104/warlit.v32i2.1367
  15. Manatar, P. M., E. H. Laoh, and J. R. Mandei. 2017. Pengaruh Status Penguasaan Lahan Terhadap Pendapatan Petani di desa Tumani Kecamatan Maesan Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan. Jurnal Agri-Sosioekonomi Unsrat, 13(1): 55-64. https://doi.org/10.35791/agrsosek.13.1.2017.14920
  16. Nugroho, J. 2013. Analisis Usahatani Padi Organik di Kecamatan Mojogadang Kabupaten Karanganyar. Skripsi. Universitas Sebelas Maret. Retrieved from https://digilib.uns.ac.id/dokumen/detail/29698
  17. Nuraida, A. S. Nasution. 2018. Peranan Biopestisida Terhadap Penyakit Tanaman Padi Di Desa Hutagaol Peatalun Balige. Jurnal Prodikmas: Hasil Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 3(1): 30-36. https://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/prodikmas/article/view/2534
  18. Oktha, D. A. 2023. Pengaruh Sistem Olah Tanah Dan Pemupukan Nitrogen Terhadap Ruang Pori Tanah Pada Pertanaman Jagung (Zea Mays L.) Tahun Ke-34 Di Lahan Politeknik Negeri Lampung. Skripsi. Universitas Lampung Bandar Lampung. Retrieved from http://digilib.unila.ac.id/76029/3/3.%20SKRIPSI%20TANPA%20BAB%20PEMBAHASAN.pdf
  19. Pani, S., Y. W. Harinta, and Y. S. Arianti. 2023. Analisis Risiko Usaha Tani Kedelai Di Desa Suci Kecamatan Pracimantoro Kabupaten Wonogiri. Agrisaintifika: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian, 7(2): 16-22. https://doi.org/10.32585/ags.v7i2(is).4343
  20. Parmawati, R. 2019. Valuasi Ekonomi Sumberdaya Alam & Lingkungan Menuju Ekonomi Hijau. Universitas Brawijaya Press
  21. Parmawati, R., I. Yanti, L. Hakim, F. K. Gunawan, N. O. Rahmawati, and F. Muhammad. 2023. Sustainable Agriculture Model Development to Control Agricultural Land Conversion in Kemiren Tourism Village, Banyuwangi Regency. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9 (Special Issue): 494-499. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9iSpecialIssue.6700
  22. Pitcher, T. J., and D. Preikshot. 2001. RAPFISH: a rapid appraisal technique to evaluate the sustainability status of fisheries. Fisheries Research, 49(3): 255-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(00)00205-8
  23. Prasetyo, B., T. Chikmawati, E. B. Walujo, and E. Amzu. 2018. Ethnoecology: the traditional landscape of Osing Tribe in Banyuwangi, Indonesia. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 19(6): 2003-2009. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d190604
  24. Shofwan, M., N. N. Suma, and J. C. Jihan. 2022. Characteristics Of Indigenous Culture and Disaster Management Osing Tribe, Kemiren Village, Glagah District, Banyuwangi Regency. Fenomena, 21(2): 283-298. https://doi.org/10.35719/fenomena.v21i2.130
  25. Streimikiene, D., B. Svagzdiene, E. Jasinskas, and A. Simanavicius. 2021. Sustainable tourism developpment and competitiveness: The systematic literature review. Sustainable development, 29(1): 259-271. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2133
  26. Sudarma, I. M., N. M. Sritamin, I. G. N. Bagus, 2016. Pengendalian Hama dan Penyakit Tanaman Padi di Desa Pesaban Kecamatan Rendang, Karangasem. Udayana Mengabdi, 15(3): 106 – 112
  27. Sugiyono. 2019. Metode penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta
  28. Topcuoğlu, B. 2023. Social and Ecological Impacts of Sustainable Agriculture. International Journal of BioLife Sciences (IJBLS), 2(1): 50-58. https://doi.org/10.22034/jbs.2023.178660
  29. Triana, D., and W. Widyarto. 2013. Relevansi Kualifikasi Kontraktor Bidang Teknik Sipil terhadap Kualitas Pekerjaan Proyek Konstruksi di Provinsi Baten. Jurnal FONDASI, 1(1): 182–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.36055/jft.v2i2.1732
  30. Vasu, D., P. Tiwary, P. Chandran, and S. K. Singh. 2020. Soil quality for sustainable agriculture. Nutrient dynamics for sustainable crop production, 41-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8660-2_2
  31. Wati, C. 2017. Identifikasi Hama Tanaman Padi (Oryza sativa L.) Dengan Perangkap Cahaya di Kampung Desay Distril Prafi Provinsi Papua Barat. Jurnal Triton, 8(2): 81-87
  32. Wahyuni, E., D. Rukmana, S. Egra, R. Fitriani, and A. Wulandari. 2023. Is Agricultural Institutions Affect the Sustainability of Local Adan Rice Farming?. Indigenous Agriculture, 1(1): 18-28. https://doi.org/10.20956/ia.v1i1.25785

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.