DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/agrisocionomics.v8i1.19825

COLLABORATION AMONG FARMER’S AND INTERMEDIARY TRADERS IN MARKETING OF GREENHOUSE HYDROPONIC PRODUCTS IN GREATER MALANG

*Ni Made Gita Santhika Dewi  -  Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Udayana, Bali, Indonesia, Indonesia
Ketut Budi Susrusa  -  Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Udayana, Bali, Indonesia, Indonesia
Gede Mekse Korri Arisena  -  Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Udayana, Bali, Indonesia, Indonesia
Ary Bakhtiar  -  Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, East Java, Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2024 Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The emergence of negative effects associated with conventional agriculture encourages a transition from conventional to modern agriculture. Hydroponic farming, which utilizes water as a growing medium, is one form of modern agriculture. This research aimed to find out the management of farming business governance of hydroponic greenhouse products in Greater Malang, which includes commodities marketed, marketing institutions involved, the form of marketing channels that occur, and marketing functions used by analyzing marketing margins and farmer's share and knowing the corporate system between traders of hydroponic greenhouse products in Greater Malang. This study analyzed the data using qualitative and quantitative descriptive methods. Moreover, this study utilized ten samples determined by purposive sampling with consideration the aim of this research is clear, namely to find out the marketing of hydroponics greenhouse products in Greater Malang. In addition, the sample for this study was selected using the snowball sampling method, which sampled the marketing channels of the previous ten samples. The results of this study indicate that the management of hydroponic greenhouse vegetables in Greater Malang begins with the most frequently traded product, in this case, lettuce. Participating marketing institutions included farmers, collecting traders, retailers, restaurant consumers, and end consumers. Level 1 marketing channel is the channel with the most consumers. The marketing functions used are the exchange function, the procurement function, and the facilitating function. Level 0 marketing channels have no marketing margin value because the price farmers receive is identical to that of consumers. Marketing channel level 0 for all commodities and marketing channel level 1 for all commodities are deemed efficient for the farmer's share. The cooperative system among hydroponic greenhouse vegetable sellers in Greater Malang is harmonious, contributing to a healthy market atmosphere.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: farmer's share, hydroponic greenhouse vegetables, management governance, marketing margin, trader cooperative system

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
THE IMPACT OF E-COMMERCE IMPLEMENTATION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF MICRO AND SMALL INDUSTRIES IN INDONESIA COLLABORATION AMONG FARMER’S AND INTERMEDIARY TRADERS IN MARKETING OF GREENHOUSE HYDROPONIC PRODUCTS IN GREATER MALANG OPTIMIZATION OF GEDONG GINCU MANGO DISTRIBUTION COSTS IN MAJALENGKA DISTRICT More recent articles
  1. Azhari, M., Masahid, & Su’udi, D. (2019). Analisis Efisiensi Pemasaran Sayur Hidroponik Jenis Selada di Desa Sidoharjo Kecamatan Lamongan Kabupaten Lamongan. Jurnal Oryza, 2(2), 37–46
  2. Dewati, R., Anwar, M. F., & Harinta, Y. W. (2023). Efficiency and Marketing Channels of Vegetables in the Soloraya Hydroponic Community. J Pertanian Agros, 25(2), 1260–1271
  3. Dewi, G. K., & Syamsiyah, N. (2020). Alih Fungsi Lahan Sawah Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Pendapatan Petani Di Desa Cacaban, Kecamatan Conggeang, Kabupaten Sumedang. Mimbar Agribisnis: Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis, 6(2), 843. https://doi.org/10.25157/ma.v6i2.3572
  4. Dewi, I. A. L., & Sarjana, I. M. (2015). Faktor-Faktor Pendorong Alihfungsi Lahan Sawah Menjadi Lahan Non-Pertanian. Jurnal Manajemen Agribisnis, 3(2), 163–171
  5. Don Piran, R., Payong, P., & Priscilla Cordanis, A. (2022). Analisis Pemasaran Sayuran di Pasar Inpres Ruteng Kabupaten Manggarai. Forum Agribisnis, 12(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.29244/fagb.12.2.151-160
  6. Fadlina, I. M., Supriyono, B., & Soeaidy, S. (2013). PERENCANAAN PEMBANGUNAN PERTANIAN BERKELANJUTAN (Kajian tentang Pengembangan Pertanian Organik di Kota Batu). J-Pal, 4(1), 43–57. http://jpal.ub.ac.id/index.php/jpal/article/view/115/115
  7. Hudha, M., Anggreni, I. G. A. A. L., & Dewi, I. A. L. (2020). an Analysis of Marketing Margin and Elasticity of Bell Pepper Commodity Price Transmission (a Study in Candikuning Village, Baturiti District, Tabanan Regency). Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, 4(2), 321–329. https://doi.org/10.14710/agrisocionomics.v4i2.7071
  8. Kholis, A., Maipita, I., Fitrawaty, Herkules, Sagala, G. H., & Prayogo, R. R. (2022). Feasibility Study of Hydroponics as a Home Industry. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Strategic Issues on Economics, Business and, Education (ICoSIEBE 2021), 204(ICoSIEBE 2021), 109–112. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220104.016
  9. Kilmanun, J. C., & Ndaru, R. K. (2020). Analisis Pendapatan Usahatani Sayuran Hidroponik di Malang Jawa Timur. Jurnal Pertanian Agros, 22(2), 180–185
  10. Kusumastuti, A. C., Kolopaking, L. M., & Barus, B. (2018). Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Alih Fungsi Lahan Pertanian Pangan di Kabupaten Pandeglang. Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaa, 6(2), 130–136
  11. Linda, J., Qamaria, M. N. S., Hafid, A. F., Samsuddin, H. B., & Rahim, A. (2021). Hidroponik Sebagai Sarana Pemanfaatan Lahan Kosong di Kantor Lurah Salo, Watang Sawitto, Pinrang. Jurnal Lepa-Lepa Open, 1, 503–510
  12. Melinda, S. D., Juita, F., & Wijayanti, T. (2022). Analisis Ekonomi Sayuran Hidroponik (Studi Kasus Di PT. Hanumart Utama Mulia Samarinda). Jurnal Prosiding Seminar Nasional Agribisnis, 2(1), 51–55
  13. Miftah, H., Yoesdiarti, A., & Soka, T. D. (2019). Commercial Vegetable Supply Chains in the Traditional Market of Bogor City That Give To Farmers. Jurnal Pertanian, 9(2), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.30997/jp.v9i2.1478
  14. Pani, Bahari, Y., & Fatmawati. (2021). Analisis relasi sosial asosiatif antar pedagang perempuan di pasar lintang desa mandor kabupaten landak. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 10(12), 1–10. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v10i12.51002
  15. Ramadan, S. P., Betty, B., & Fadjar, A. (2023). Saluran Dan Efesiensi Pemasaran Selada Hidroponik Skala Rumahan Dalam Upaya Peningkatan Perekonomian Keluarga Desa Loru. Journal of Manajement and Social Sciences, 2(2), 147–160
  16. Roidah, I. S. (2014). Pemanfaatan Lahan Dengan Menggunakan Sistem Hidroponik. 1(2), 43–50
  17. Rusdi, M., Loilatu, S. H., Mardiah, R., & Papuangan, A. A. (2021). Interaksi Sosial Pedagang Sayur di Pasar Induk Namlea Kabupaten Buru. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 7(4), 95–101
  18. Setiawan, H., Rustiyarso, & Hidayah, R. Al. (2022). Relasi Sosial Antar Sesama Pedagang Sayur Di Pasar Tradisional Flamboyan Kota Pontianak. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 1–9

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.