skip to main content

FACTORS INFLUENCING WORKING MOTIVATION OF AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION AGENTS IN CENTRAL JAVA PROVINCE

*Warsana Warsana  -  Master of Agribusiness, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, Indonesia
Wulan Sumekar  -  Master of Agribusiness, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, Indonesia
Yanuar Luqman  -  Master Program of Communication Science, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2024 Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Productivity of rice in Pekalongan and Jepara regencies is the lowest in the Pantura region of Central Java province. One of the problems is that the number of extension workers is still insufficient and is not balanced with the area of agricultural areas in the district. The existence of agricultural instructors has a positive impact on farmer behavior, including knowledge, attitudes and skills. The more advanced farmers' behavior will have the impact of increasing the productivity of their farming This indicates that the program of one Agricultural Extension Agent for one village has not been fulfilled. This research was conducted to analyze education, experience, and workload toward work motivation in the field. Survey approach was used in this research. Sampling was done using a proportionate random sampling as a sampling technique for selecting respondents with total 122 agricultural extension agents in Pekalongan and Jepara regencies. Data sources using primary data and secondary data Multiple regression was used for data analysis. The results of the study show that education, work experience and workload had influence both simultaneously and partially toward work motivation of extension workers in Pekalongan City and Jepara. Good education and better experience with appropriate workload can increase motivation. It need approach to maintain a moderate workload to improve work motivation. Agricultural Extension Workers with high work motivation provide the best performance during extension activities. The conclusion of this research is that all hypotheses in this research are accepted and have a positive and significant influence. Extension workers are expected to be able to maintain their work so that the work motivation of Agricultural Extension workers is maintained.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: education, extension workers, material delivery, working experience, workload

Article Metrics:

  1. Badan Penyuluhan dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pertanian Kabupaten Jepara. (2021). Profil Badan Penyuluhan dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pertanian Kabupaten Jepara. Jepara: BP2SDMP Kabupaten Jepara
  2. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2020). Kabupaten Pekalongan Dalam Angka 2020. Pekalongan: BPS Kabupaten Pekalongan
  3. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Jepara. (2020). Kabupaten Jepara dalam angka 2020. Jepara: Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Jepara
  4. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2021). Booklet Sakernas Survei Angkatan Kerja Nasional Fungsi Statistik Ketenagakerjaan. Badan Pusat Statistik. Jakarta
  5. Barnawi & M. Arifin. (2012). Etika dan Profesi Kependidikan. Ar-ruzz Media. Yogyakarta
  6. Bahua, M. I., Jahi, A., Asngari, P. S., Saleh, A., & Purnaba, I. G. P. (2010). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kinerja penyuluh pertanian dan dampaknya pada perilaku petani jagung di Provinsi Gorontalo. Jurnal Ilmiah Agropolitan, 3(1), 293-303
  7. Gayatri, S. & M. Vaarst. (2020). Indonesian smallholder beef producers' perception of sustainability and their reactions to the results of an assessment using the sustainability assessment of food and agriculture system (SAFA) - a case study based on focus group discussions. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture 45(1): 58–68
  8. Handoko, T. H. (2001). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Edisi ke- 2. BPFE. Yogyakarta
  9. Jorgi, R.S., S. Gayatri, & T. Dalmiyatun. (2019). Relationship Between the Level of Farmer Knowledge and the Effectiveness of Farmer Card Program (Program Kartu Tani) Implementation in Semarang Regency Hubungan Tingkat Pengetahuan Petani dengan Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Program Kartu Tani di Kabupaten Semarang. Agraris 5(2): 88–98
  10. Kharis, I. (2015). Pengaruh gaya kepemimpinan transformasional terhadap kinerja karyawan dengan motivasi kerja kerja sebagai variabel intervening (studi pada karyawan bank jatim cabang malang). Disertasi. Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Brawijaya. Malang
  11. Listiani, R., Setiadi, A., & Santoso, S. I. (2019). Analisis pendapatan usahatani pada petani padi di Kecamatan Mlonggo Kabupaten Jepara. Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, 3(1), 50-58
  12. Mangkunegara, A.A.A.P. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung
  13. Nugroho, W., & Marwanto, M. (2016). Evaluasi Tingkat Kesuburan Tanah Dan Upaya Peningkatan Produksi Tanaman Pangan Di Kecamatan Kajen Kabupaten Pekalongan. Jurnal Agrotek Tropika 4(1): 67-74
  14. Pemerintah Kabupaten Pekalongan. (2017). Kabupaten Pekalongan Dalam Angka 2017. Pekalongan: Bappeda Kabupaten Pekalongan
  15. Refiswal. (2018). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Penyuluh Pertanian di Kabupaten Langkat. Medan. Agrica Ekstensia 122: 26-32
  16. Setyaji, B., H. Yanto., & D. Prihandono. (2020). The role of personality, adversity intelligence, and creativity in increasing entrepreneurial interest through student involvement in entrepreneurship lectures. Semarang. Journal of Economic Education 91: 9-18
  17. Sondang P. Siagian. (2001). Teori dan Praktek Pengembangan Organisasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
  18. Sugiarto, M., Nur, S., Djatmiko, O.E., & S. Gayatri. (2019). Discrepancy and spatial grouping of individual potential among Kebumen Ongole Grade cattle farmers in Kebumen Regency. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture 44(2): 195–203
  19. Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. CV. Alfabeta. Bandung
  20. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia. (2013). Nomor 19 Tahun 2013 tentang Perlindungan dan Pemberdayaan Petani. Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.