DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/agrisocionomics.v8i1.17962

FACTORS INFLUENCING FARMERS' PERCEPTIONS OF AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION PERFORMANCE IN TAMAN DISTRICT PEMALANG DISTRICT

*Ba'itsuddin 'Adlih  -  Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, Indonesia
Kadhung Prayoga  -  Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, Indonesia
Joko Mariyono orcid scopus publons  -  Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2024 Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

A small number of agricultural extension workers and the budget for extension activities could affect farmers' perceptions of the performance of agricultural extension workers in Taman District, Pemalang Regency. The research was conducted to analyze farmers' perceptions of the performance of agricultural extension workers in Taman District, Pemalang Regency, and analyze the influencing factors. This research was conducted in January – February 2023 in Taman District, Pemalang Regency. The research method used was a survey with a proportionate stratified random sampling of 108 farmers. Data collection techniques in this study were observation, interviews, and documentation. The type of data was primary data including data on farmers' perceptions of the performance of agricultural extension agents and their factors, the identity of farmers and the identity of extension agents, regarding extension activities carried out, as well as their functions and duties and secondary data includes regional conditions and statistics and farmer documents. The analytical method used was descriptive analysis and multiple linear regression analysis. The results showed that farmers' perceptions of the performance of agricultural extension workers in Taman District, Pemalang Regency, obtained an average score of 1919 with an index score of 76.00% which means it was categorized excellent. The variables of farmer activity, farmer age, farmer education level, length of farming, and land area simultaneously influenced farmers' perceptions of the performance of agricultural extension agents in Taman District, Pemalang Regency.While only partially farmer activeness variable that influenced farmers' perceptions of the performance of agricultural extension workers in Taman District, Pemalang Regency. Suggestions that can be conveyed were that the government needs to increase the number of agricultural extension workers and provide a budget to improve their performance so that farmers can increase their prosperity. 

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: agricultural extension workers, farmers characteristics, performance, perception

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
COCOA MARKETING CHANNEL ANALYSIS IN MARGOLEMBO VILLAGE, MANGKUTANA DISTRICT, EAST LUWU REGENCY ANALYSIS OF LOCATION QUOTIENT AND SHIFT SHARE IN RIAU PROVINCE COLLABORATION AMONG FARMER’S AND INTERMEDIARY TRADERS IN MARKETING OF GREENHOUSE HYDROPONIC PRODUCTS IN GREATER MALANG More recent articles
  1. Adiansyah, I. M. (2020). Study of Farmers' Perceptions of the Use of Certified Seeds in Rice Farming in Balimbing Village, Halongonan District, North Padang Lawas Regency. Muhammadiyah University of North Sumatra. Medan. (Thesis)
  2. Ali, H., W. Tolinggi, & Y. Saleh. (2018). Farmers' perceptions of the performance of field agricultural extension workers in Talumelito Village, Telaga Biru District, Gorontalo Regency. J. Agrinesia. 2(2): 111 – 120
  3. Arikunto, S. (2013). Research Procedure: A Practice Approach. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
  4. Arvianti, E. Y., Masyhuri, L. R. Waluyati, & D. H. Darwanto. (2019). An overview of the crisis of young farmers in Indonesia. J. Socio-Economy and Agricultural Policy. 8(2): 168 – 180
  5. Central Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Pemalang Regency in Figures. Malang Regency
  6. Hidayat, N. K., A. Ismail, Hastuti, & F. D. Raswatie. (2022). Potential and strategies for developing urban farming in increasing access to sustainable food in Gunung Putri District, Bogor Regency. J. Indonesian Agricultural Sciences. 27(3): 385 – 396
  7. Ibrahim, J. T., G. M. Ningsih, & C. Feliyana. (2021). Farmers' perceptions of the performance of agricultural extension workers in the villageTorongrejo, Junrejo District, Batu City. J. Agricultural Communication and Extension. 2(1): 19 – 30
  8. Imron, M. A. (2020). Analysis of Farmers' Perceptions of the Performance of Gapoktan in Makmur in Astomulyo Village, Punggur District, Central Lampung Regency. Dharma Wacana Metro College of Agricultural Sciences. Metro. (Thesis)
  9. Iswardayati, N. T. (2015). The effectiveness of agricultural extension programs and the performance of extension agents in Gunung Kidul Regency. J. Agricultural Sciences. 21(1): 1 – 15
  10. Koampa, M. V., B. Olfie, M. M. Sendow, & V. R. B. Moniaga. (2015). Participation of farmer groups in agricultural extension activities in Kanonang Lima Village, West Kawangkoan District. J. Agri Socioeconomics. 11(3): 19 – 32
  11. Lestari, P. & L. Safitri. (2022). Study of the effectiveness of basic expert training on the performance of extension workers in supporting agricultural development. J. Indonesian Community Service. 2(5): 621 – 627
  12. Mandang, M., M. F. L. Sondakh, & O. E. H. Laoh. (2020). Characteristics of smallholder farmers in Tolok Village, Tompaso District. J. Agricultural, Social and Economic Transdiscipline. 16(1): 105 – 114
  13. Manyamsari, I. & Mujiburrahmad. (2014). Characteristics of farmers and the relationship with the competence of smallholder farmers. J. Agrisep. 15(2): 58 – 74
  14. Mariyono, J. (2019). Microcredit and technology adoption: Sustained pathways to improve farmers' prosperity in Indonesia. J. Agricultural Finance Review. 79(1): 85 – 106
  15. Ningrum, E. (2014). Utilization of regional potential to increase farmer productivity. 31(2): 181 – 188
  16. Riwukore, J. R. & F. Habaora. (2019). Perception of farmers on the performance of extensionist in the pasture agroecosystem of Timor Tengah Utara District. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology. 29(2): 1–10
  17. Ropiko, H. H. & Y. Safrianto. (2022). The effectiveness of the role of the Agricultural Extension Center on rice production in Siabu District, Mandailing Natal Regency. J. Information Management Publications. 1(3): 108-113
  18. Saputri, D. C. & Sulistyaningsih. (2019). Farmers' perceptions of the performance of extension workers in Klampokan Village in developing organic rice. J. Scientific. 17(1): 34 – 41
  19. Sennuga, S. O., O. S. Olusola, & E. E. Merianchris. (2020). Farmers' perceptions of agricultural extension agents' performance in Sub-Saharan African Communities. International Journal of Environmental & Agriculture Research (IJOEAR). 6(5): 1 – 12
  20. Setiawan, R. A. P., T. I. Noor, L. Sulistyowati, & I. Setiawan. (2019). Analysis of the level of welfare of soybean farmers using the Farmer Exchange Rate (NTP) and Farmer Household Income Exchange Rates (NTPRP) approaches. J. Integrated Agribusiness. 12(2): 178 – 189
  21. Sugiyono. (2013). Quantitative, Qualitative Research Methods, and R&D. Bandung: Alphabet
  22. Sundari, A. H. A. Yusra, & Nurliza. (2015). The role of agricultural extension workers in increasing farm production in Pontianak Regency. J. Socioeconomic Agriculture. 4(1): 26 – 31

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.