THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE INSTRUMENT PLANNED BEHAVIOR THEORY IN MEASURING STUDENTS' INTENTIONS TO ENGAGE IN AGRICULTURAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP

Ikhsan Fuady; Yulia Andriani; Moch. Armien Syifaa Sutarjo

doi:10.14710/agrisocionomics.v7i2.16637

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/agrisocionomics.v7i2.16637

THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE INSTRUMENT PLANNED BEHAVIOR THEORY IN MEASURING STUDENTS' INTENTIONS TO ENGAGE IN AGRICULTURAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP

*Ikhsan Fuady

- Universitas Padjajaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia, Indonesia

Yulia Andriani - Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia, Indonesia

Moch. Armien Syifaa Sutarjo - Universitas Telkom, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia, Indonesia

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{Agrisocionomics16637,
    author = {Ikhsan Fuady and Yulia Andriani and Moch. Armien Sutarjo},
    title = {THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE INSTRUMENT PLANNED BEHAVIOR THEORY IN MEASURING STUDENTS' INTENTIONS TO ENGAGE IN AGRICULTURAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP},
    journal = {Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian},
  volume = {7},
    number = {2},
    year = {2023},
    keywords = {agricultural business behavior intentions, instrument validity, planned behavior theory},
    abstract = { The intention of agricultural students to carry out agricultural business is an important thing as a locomotive for the development of agricultural human resources in the future. However, the evaluation of the instrument of Intention to carry out a validated agricultural business is still lacking. This study aims to test and develop a valid and reliable instrument of intention to carry out agricultural business and to determine the level of intention to do agricultural business among students. This research method uses a survey approach which (where the population of this study was 1200 students of the faculty of agriculture in Riau Province, while the sample of this study was 98 respondents.Data analysis to test the validity and reliability using the Rasch modeling test with Winstep. The results of the analysis show that from testing 17 instrument items, which consist of; (a) 5 items instrument attitude, 4 items have good goodfit, while 1 item no 2 is misfit. (b) 4 item instrument subjective norm, where 3 items have good parameters, while 1 item no 9 is misfit, (c) 4 Perceive behavior control instrument items, where 3 items have good parameters, while 1 item no 13 is misfit, (d) 4 instrument intention items, where all items have good parameters or good fit. This value indicates a very good consistency of respondents answers, as well as the quality of the instrument items. For the rating scale test, it was found that respondents were only good enough at distinguishing the rating scale when the scale was from 1 to 4. Based on these findings, it is suggested that in measuring student intentions to do entrepreneurship with the planned behavior theory, it is better to use answer items with 4 scales. },
   issn = {2621-9778},   pages = {300--311}  doi = {10.14710/agrisocionomics.v7i2.16637},
    url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/agrisocionomics/article/view/16637}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

The intention of agricultural students to carry out agricultural business is an important thing as a locomotive for the development of agricultural human resources in the future. However, the evaluation of the instrument of Intention to carry out a validated agricultural business is still lacking. This study aims to test and develop a valid and reliable instrument of intention to carry out agricultural business and to determine the level of intention to do agricultural business among students. This research method uses a survey approach which (where the population of this study was 1200 students of the faculty of agriculture in Riau Province, while the sample of this study was 98 respondents.Data analysis to test the validity and reliability using the Rasch modeling test with Winstep. The results of the analysis show that from testing 17 instrument items, which consist of; (a) 5 items instrument attitude, 4 items have good goodfit, while 1 item no 2 is misfit. (b) 4 item instrument subjective norm, where 3 items have good parameters, while 1 item no 9 is misfit, (c) 4 Perceive behavior control instrument items, where 3 items have good parameters, while 1 item no 13 is misfit, (d) 4 instrument intention items, where all items have good parameters or good fit. This value indicates a very good consistency of respondents answers, as well as the quality of the instrument items. For the rating scale test, it was found that respondents were only good enough at distinguishing the rating scale when the scale was from 1 to 4. Based on these findings, it is suggested that in measuring student intentions to do entrepreneurship with the planned behavior theory, it is better to use answer items with 4 scales.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: agricultural business behavior intentions, instrument validity, planned behavior theory

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 7, No 2 (2023): June 2023

Recent articles

CHARACTERISTICS OF SOCIAL CAPITAL AGRIBUSINESS MICRO FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS OF AGRIBUSINESS (MFIA) IN PADANG CITY THE FACTORS INFLUENCING TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION PROCESS OF FARMERS IN TERM OF AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION POLICY CASE IN CENTRAL JAVA INDONESIA IMPACT OF AGRICULTURAL CREDIT ON PERFORMANCE OF RED CHILI FARMS IN INDONESIA More recent articles

Ajzen, I. (1991a). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ajzen, I. (1991b). The Theory of Planned Behavior
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2014). Keadaan Tenagakerja Februari 2014. Berita Resmi Statistik, 17(38), 1–5
Bambang, S. (2014). Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Sosial Kuantitatif (Bambang trim, Ed.; 1st ed.). Trimkomunikata
Boone, W. J., Yale, M. S., & Staver, J. R. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. In Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4
Cristea, M., & Gheorghiu, A. (2016). Attitude, perceived behavioral control, and intention to adopt risky behaviors. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 43, 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.10.004
Fuady, I., & D. P. titien Y. (2021). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Intensi Mahasiswa Dalam Penerapan Protokol Kesehatan Dalam Pencegahan Penularan Covid 19. Window of Health : Jurnal Kesehatan, 4(2)
Gracia, S. (2005). Digital Commons @ RIC Analyzing CSR Implementation with the Rasch Model. https://digitalcommons.ric.edu/facultypublications
Isbah, U., & Iyan, R. Y. (2016). Analisis Peran Sektor Pertanian dalam Perekonomian dan Kesempatan Kerja di Provinsi Riau. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pembangunan, Tahun VII(19), 45–54
Novitasari, D., Naila, R., Syarifah, K., Suroto, A., Mustafa, M. B., & Noorhidayah, D. R. (2020). Peningkatan Minat Generasi Muda Di Bidang Pertanian Melalui Kegiatan Pelatihan Pertanian Organik. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Dan Call for Papers Pengembangan Sumber Daya Perdesaan Dan Kearifan Lokal Berkelanjutan X, 212–219
Parcell, J. L., & Sykuta, M. S. (2003). Undergraduate perceptions of the need for an agricultural entrepreneurship curriculum. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 28(3), 659
Ponto, J. (2015). Understanding and Evaluating Survey Research. Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology, 6(2), 168–171. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4601897/pdf/jadp-06-168.pdf
Ridha, R. N., Burhanuddin, B., & Wahyu, B. P. (2017). Entrepreneurship intention in agricultural sector of young generation in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjie-04-2017-022
Saragih, B. (2010). Refleksi Agribisnis (R. Pambudy, B. Krisnamurthi, & F. B. M. Dabukke (eds.)). IPB Press
Syam, A., & M. Noekman, K. (2003). Kontribusi Sektor Pertanian Dalam Penyediaan Lapangan Kerja Dan Perbandingannya Dengan Sektor-Sektor Lain. Kontribusi Sektor Pertanian Dalam Penyediaan Lapangan Kerja Dan Perbandingannya Dengan Sektor-Sektor Lain, 3, 74–82

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Starting from 2021, the author(s) whose article is published in the Agrisocionomics journal attain the copyright for their article. By submitting the manuscript to Agrisocionomics, the author(s) agree with this policy. No special document approval is required.

The author(s) guarantee that:

Their article is original, written by the mentioned author(s),
Has never been published before,
Does not contain statements that violate the law, and
Does not violate the rights of others, is subject to copyright held exclusively by the author(s), and is free from the rights of third parties, and that the necessary written permission to quote from other sources has been obtained by the author(s).

The author(s) retain all rights to the published work, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:

Copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article, such as patents,
The right to use the substance of the article in its own future works, including lectures and books,
The right to reproduce the article for its own purposes,
The right to archive all versions of the article, and
The right to enter into separate additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of published versions of the article (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.

If the article was prepared jointly by more than one author, each author submitting the manuscript warrants that they have been given permission by all co-authors to agree to copyright and license notices (agreements) on their behalf, and agree to notify the co-authors of the terms of this policy. Agrisocionomics will not be held responsible for anything that may arise because of the writer's internal dispute. Agrisocionomics will only communicate with correspondence authors.

Authors should also understand that once published, their articles (and any additional files, including data sets, and analysis/computation data) will become publicly available. The license of published articles (and additional data) will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently featured on the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Agrisocionomics allows users to copy, distribute, display and perform work under license. Users need to attribute the author(s) and Agrisocionomics to distribute works in journals and other publication media. Unless otherwise stated, the author(s) is a public entity as soon as the article is published.