DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/agrisocionomics.v7i2.16637

THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE INSTRUMENT PLANNED BEHAVIOR THEORY IN MEASURING STUDENTS' INTENTIONS TO ENGAGE IN AGRICULTURAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP

*Ikhsan Fuady orcid  -  Universitas Padjajaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia, Indonesia
Yulia Andriani  -  Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia, Indonesia
Moch. Armien Syifaa Sutarjo  -  Universitas Telkom, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2023 Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The intention of agricultural students to carry out agricultural business is an important thing as a locomotive for the development of agricultural human resources in the future. However, the evaluation of the instrument of Intention to carry out a validated agricultural business is still lacking. This study aims to test and develop a valid and reliable instrument of intention to carry out agricultural business and to determine the level of intention to do agricultural business among students. This research method uses a survey approach which (where the population of this study was 1200 students of the faculty of agriculture in Riau Province, while the sample of this study was 98 respondents.Data analysis to test the validity and reliability using the Rasch modeling test with Winstep. The results of the analysis show that from testing 17 instrument items, which consist of; (a) 5 items instrument attitude, 4 items have good goodfit, while 1 item no 2 is misfit. (b) 4 item instrument subjective norm, where 3 items have good parameters, while 1 item no 9 is misfit, (c) 4 Perceive behavior control instrument items, where 3 items have good parameters, while 1 item no 13 is misfit, (d) 4 instrument intention items, where all items have good parameters or good fit. This value indicates a very good consistency of respondents answers, as well as the quality of the instrument items. For the rating scale test, it was found that respondents were only good enough at distinguishing the rating scale when the scale was from 1 to 4. Based on these findings, it is suggested that in measuring student intentions to do entrepreneurship with the planned behavior theory, it is better to use answer items with 4 scales.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: agricultural business behavior intentions, instrument validity, planned behavior theory

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
TECHNO-ECONOMIC UTILIZATION COMPLETE FEED FOR BEEF CATTLE DEVELOPMENT IN INDONESIA LAND AND LABOR INSTITUTION IN URBAN AGRICULTURE IN SUPPORTING FOOD SECURITY IN MAKASSAR CITY CARRYING CAPACITY OF NON-RICE FEATURED CROPS FOR ALTERNATIVE FOOD AVAILABILITY IN BANGGAI REGENCY, CENTRAL SULAWESI More recent articles
  1. Ajzen, I. (1991a). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991b). The Theory of Planned Behavior
  3. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2014). Keadaan Tenagakerja Februari 2014. Berita Resmi Statistik, 17(38), 1–5
  4. Bambang, S. (2014). Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Sosial Kuantitatif (Bambang trim, Ed.; 1st ed.). Trimkomunikata
  5. Boone, W. J., Yale, M. S., & Staver, J. R. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. In Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4
  6. Cristea, M., & Gheorghiu, A. (2016). Attitude, perceived behavioral control, and intention to adopt risky behaviors. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 43, 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.10.004
  7. Fuady, I., & D. P. titien Y. (2021). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Intensi Mahasiswa Dalam Penerapan Protokol Kesehatan Dalam Pencegahan Penularan Covid 19. Window of Health : Jurnal Kesehatan, 4(2)
  8. Gracia, S. (2005). Digital Commons @ RIC Analyzing CSR Implementation with the Rasch Model. https://digitalcommons.ric.edu/facultypublications
  9. Isbah, U., & Iyan, R. Y. (2016). Analisis Peran Sektor Pertanian dalam Perekonomian dan Kesempatan Kerja di Provinsi Riau. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pembangunan, Tahun VII(19), 45–54
  10. Novitasari, D., Naila, R., Syarifah, K., Suroto, A., Mustafa, M. B., & Noorhidayah, D. R. (2020). Peningkatan Minat Generasi Muda Di Bidang Pertanian Melalui Kegiatan Pelatihan Pertanian Organik. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Dan Call for Papers Pengembangan Sumber Daya Perdesaan Dan Kearifan Lokal Berkelanjutan X, 212–219
  11. Parcell, J. L., & Sykuta, M. S. (2003). Undergraduate perceptions of the need for an agricultural entrepreneurship curriculum. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 28(3), 659
  12. Ponto, J. (2015). Understanding and Evaluating Survey Research. Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology, 6(2), 168–171. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4601897/pdf/jadp-06-168.pdf
  13. Ridha, R. N., Burhanuddin, B., & Wahyu, B. P. (2017). Entrepreneurship intention in agricultural sector of young generation in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjie-04-2017-022
  14. Saragih, B. (2010). Refleksi Agribisnis (R. Pambudy, B. Krisnamurthi, & F. B. M. Dabukke (eds.)). IPB Press
  15. Syam, A., & M. Noekman, K. (2003). Kontribusi Sektor Pertanian Dalam Penyediaan Lapangan Kerja Dan Perbandingannya Dengan Sektor-Sektor Lain. Kontribusi Sektor Pertanian Dalam Penyediaan Lapangan Kerja Dan Perbandingannya Dengan Sektor-Sektor Lain, 3, 74–82

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.