BibTex Citation Data :
@article{Agrisocionomics15991, author = {Nina Lisanty and Nugraheni Hadiyanti and Agustia Pamujiati and Rasyadan Probojati}, title = {COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL AND CONSERVATION TILLAGE SYSTEM OF CORN CULTIVATION IN NGANJUK REGENCY, EAST JAVA PROVINCE OF INDONESIA}, journal = {Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian}, volume = {7}, number = {1}, year = {2023}, keywords = {corn, conventional tillage system, farmers' income, no-tillage}, abstract = { Corn cultivation techniques can be performed using a conventional tillage system (CovTS) and conservation tillage system (CosTS), which consists of minimum tillage (MT) and no-tillage (NT) systems. These systems have been implemented by almost every corn-producing region in Indonesia. One of these areas is Patianrowo District, Nganjuk Regency of East Java Province, Indonesia. The study was conducted to analyze the comparison from the economic side, such as the use and cost of farming inputs, revenue, income, and farming feasibility of the two cultivation systems. The study applied the methods of interview, documentation, and literature study in collecting the required data. Differences in costs, income, and the R/C ratio of maize farming from the two cultivation systems were tested statistically for independent samples. The analysis results stated that the no-tillage system was economically more profitable than the conventional system. A higher R/C Ratio value indicated that the NT system was more efficient in using costs, coupled with production time, than the CovTS. However, statistically, the two cultivation systems did not differ in production and income but showed a significant difference in labor employment. The condition of an area experiencing labor difficulties and supported by soil types such as grumosol is suitable for implementing a no-tillage system. In this case, the local government, through field extension officers, can guide farmers' decision to apply either cultivation system. Providing information, knowledge, and skills will assist maize farmers and other related parties in making decisions to obtain maximum profit and increase welfare. }, issn = {2621-9778}, pages = {60--70} doi = {10.14710/agrisocionomics.v7i1.15991}, url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/agrisocionomics/article/view/15991} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Corn cultivation techniques can be performed using a conventional tillage system (CovTS) and conservation tillage system (CosTS), which consists of minimum tillage (MT) and no-tillage (NT) systems. These systems have been implemented by almost every corn-producing region in Indonesia. One of these areas is Patianrowo District, Nganjuk Regency of East Java Province, Indonesia. The study was conducted to analyze the comparison from the economic side, such as the use and cost of farming inputs, revenue, income, and farming feasibility of the two cultivation systems. The study applied the methods of interview, documentation, and literature study in collecting the required data. Differences in costs, income, and the R/C ratio of maize farming from the two cultivation systems were tested statistically for independent samples. The analysis results stated that the no-tillage system was economically more profitable than the conventional system. A higher R/C Ratio value indicated that the NT system was more efficient in using costs, coupled with production time, than the CovTS. However, statistically, the two cultivation systems did not differ in production and income but showed a significant difference in labor employment. The condition of an area experiencing labor difficulties and supported by soil types such as grumosol is suitable for implementing a no-tillage system. In this case, the local government, through field extension officers, can guide farmers' decision to apply either cultivation system. Providing information, knowledge, and skills will assist maize farmers and other related parties in making decisions to obtain maximum profit and increase welfare.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Starting from 2021, the author(s) whose article is published in the Agrisocionomics journal attain the copyright for their article. By submitting the manuscript to Agrisocionomics, the author(s) agree with this policy. No special document approval is required.
The author(s) guarantee that:
The author(s) retain all rights to the published work, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:
If the article was prepared jointly by more than one author, each author submitting the manuscript warrants that they have been given permission by all co-authors to agree to copyright and license notices (agreements) on their behalf, and agree to notify the co-authors of the terms of this policy. Agrisocionomics will not be held responsible for anything that may arise because of the writer's internal dispute. Agrisocionomics will only communicate with correspondence authors.
Authors should also understand that once published, their articles (and any additional files, including data sets, and analysis/computation data) will become publicly available. The license of published articles (and additional data) will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently featured on the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Agrisocionomics allows users to copy, distribute, display and perform work under license. Users need to attribute the author(s) and Agrisocionomics to distribute works in journals and other publication media. Unless otherwise stated, the author(s) is a public entity as soon as the article is published.
View My Stats