FOOD SECURITY POLICY ANALYSIS PERPECTIVE ON FOOD SELF-SUFFICIENCY VILLAGE PROGRAMME CASE IN CENTRAL JAVA INDONESIA

Muhamad Rusliyadi

doi:10.14710/agrisocionomics.v7i1.16148

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/agrisocionomics.v7i1.16148

FOOD SECURITY POLICY ANALYSIS PERPECTIVE ON FOOD SELF-SUFFICIENCY VILLAGE PROGRAMME CASE IN CENTRAL JAVA INDONESIA

*Muhamad Rusliyadi

- Polytechnic of Agricultural Development Yogyakarta-Magelang, Agricultural Extension and Human Resource Development Agency, Ministry of Agriculture, Indonesia, Indonesia

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{Agrisocionomics16148,
    author = {Muhamad Rusliyadi},
    title = {FOOD SECURITY POLICY ANALYSIS PERPECTIVE ON FOOD SELF-SUFFICIENCY VILLAGE PROGRAMME CASE IN CENTRAL JAVA INDONESIA},
    journal = {Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian},
  volume = {7},
    number = {1},
    year = {2023},
    keywords = {analytic hierarchy process (AHP), food self-sufficiency village programme, food security analysis at household level, the role and impacts of policy, swot analysis},
    abstract = { This purpose of the research is analyses of the Food Security Policy In Indonesia Case Food Self-Sufficiency Village Programme (DMP Programme) in terms of the role, implementation and impact of the DMP Programme. This analysis method was used a policy strategy using SWOT analysis. The expected benefit of the analysis is to provide a description of the output national and grassroots levels. Furthermore, of analysis was used the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The result of the result is on the impact of the program on village level revealed that the total score of (S) - (W) factor value of 0.24 and the total score (O) - (T) factor is 0.17. These positive values mean that the impact of the program generally showed relative success in terms of making some improvements. However, because of the severe conditions of poor households, the impact of the Programme has not been significant enough in changing the wellbeing of the community. The conclusion of the research are first, pay more attention to ensure community involvement and active participation in the Programme: the focus should be on poor households, because most of these are not active in the village. Second, in the short term, the Programme has very significant impacts: it can contribute to increased income and food security of poor households but the villages have been running the Programme only for about four years and there is a need to ensure the sustainability of the Programme. Third, the sustainability of the Programme at village level is needed and more effort needs to be made for farmer groups not to become too dependent on fund assistance.  },
   issn = {2621-9778},   pages = {95--113}  doi = {10.14710/agrisocionomics.v7i1.16148},
    url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/agrisocionomics/article/view/16148}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

This purpose of the research is analyses of the Food Security Policy In Indonesia Case Food Self-Sufficiency Village Programme (DMP Programme) in terms of the role, implementation and impact of the DMP Programme. This analysis method was used a policy strategy using SWOT analysis. The expected benefit of the analysis is to provide a description of the output national and grassroots levels. Furthermore, of analysis was used the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The result of the result is on the impact of the program on village level revealed that the total score of (S) - (W) factor value of 0.24 and the total score (O) - (T) factor is 0.17. These positive values mean that the impact of the program generally showed relative success in terms of making some improvements. However, because of the severe conditions of poor households, the impact of the Programme has not been significant enough in changing the wellbeing of the community. The conclusion of the research are first, pay more attention to ensure community involvement and active participation in the Programme: the focus should be on poor households, because most of these are not active in the village. Second, in the short term, the Programme has very significant impacts: it can contribute to increased income and food security of poor households but the villages have been running the Programme only for about four years and there is a need to ensure the sustainability of the Programme. Third, the sustainability of the Programme at village level is needed and more effort needs to be made for farmer groups not to become too dependent on fund assistance.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: analytic hierarchy process (AHP), food self-sufficiency village programme, food security analysis at household level, the role and impacts of policy, swot analysis

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 7, No 1 (2023): March 2023

Recent articles

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF STIMULANTS APPLICATION ON RUBBER FARMING IN TANJUNG MAKMUR VILLAGE, OGAN KOMERING ILIR DISTRICT SUSTAINABILITY OF PRODUCTION, SALES, AND PRICES OF HERBAL DRINK PRODUCTS DEVELOPED BY THE CENTER FOR AGROTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION (PIAT) UGM: A BREAK-EVEN POINT APPROACH THE ROLE OF FARMERS AND MIDDLEMEN IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF ACTOR NETWORK THEORY: STUDY OF ACTORS ON AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT DISTRIBUTION CHAIN IN KAPONAN VILLAGE, MAGELANG REGENCY, CENTRAL JAVA More recent articles

Amarendra Pratap Singh. (2015). Ensuring Food Security Of Rural People : Some Policy Interventions. MI Journal Vol. XI, No. 2; December 2015. p 10. Retrieved from : http://www.inflibnet.ac.in/ojs/index.php/MI/article /download/3808/3003
BKP. Badan Ketahanan Pangan - Food Security Agency Ministry of Agriculture (2017) General Guidelines for Food Self-Sufficiency Village Activity Movement towards Food Self-sufficiency. Food Security Agency Ministry of Agriculture
BKP. Badan Ketahanan Pangan - Food Security Agency Ministry of Agriculture (2014). General Guidelines for Food Self-Sufficiency Village Activity Movement towards Food Self-Sufficiency. Food Security Agency Ministry of Agriculture. Jakarta
Boratynska, K & Huseynov, R T (2017). An innovative approach to food security policy in developing countries. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2: 39–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.01.007 www.elsevier.es/jik
Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) (2015). Indonesia in Number Book. Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia 2015.. Badan Pusat Statistik, BPS. ISSN/ISBN : 0126-2912
Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) (2016). Indonesia in Number Book. Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia 2016.. Badan Pusat Statistik, BPS. ISSN/ISBN : ISSN/ISBN : 0126-2912
Darwis, V and Rusastra I W.. (2016). Optimizing Rural Community Empowerment through Integrating PUAP and Desa Mandiri Pangan Programs. Agricultural Policy Analysis Journal. Volume 9 No. 2, June 2016: 125-142
Dewan Ketahanan Pangan (DKP) & World Food Programme (WFP) (2014). A Food Security and Vulnerability Atlas of Indonesia. ISBN: 978-979-99549-1-6. Jakarta
DKP (2014). Panduan Penyusunan Peta Ketahanan dan Kerentanan Pangan di Indonesia: A Food Security and Vulnerability Atlas of Indonesia (FSVA). Jakarta: Dewan Ketahanan Pangan dan World Food Programme
Gandhi,V P & Marsh, R (2003). Development nd Poverty Reduction: Do Institutions Matter? A Study on the Impact of Local Institutions in Rural India. Contributed Paper, The 25th International Conference of Agricultural Economists, August 16-22, Durban, South Africa
Grewal B, Grunfeld H & Sheehan P (2017). The contribution of agricultural growth to poverty reduction. ACIAR Impact Assessment Series Report No. 76. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra
Howlett, M. (2019). Moving policy implementation theory forward: A multiple streams/critical juncture approach. Public Policy and Administration, 34(4), 405–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076718775791
Quisumbing, A R (2003). Household Decisions, Gender, and Development A Synthesis of Recent Research. An earlier, expanded version of Chapter 8, “Gender differentials in farm productivity: Implications for household efficiency and agricultural policy,” in Food Policy 20: 407–423 (1995). The current version appears with the permission of Elsevier. International Food Policy Research Institute Washington, D.C. ISBN 0-89629-717-9
Rusliyadi, M, and Libin, W (2018). Agriculture development programs for poverty reduction evidences from Indonesia and china - comparative study case. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 8(2), 104-118
Rusliyadi, M, Jamil, A, B, Mohd. and Kumalasar, R. T. (2019). Analysis of household food security policy: case of food security village programme, Indonesia. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 9(1), 19-32
Rusliyadi, M. (2021). The Role of the Institutional, Assistance, and Source Information Analysis on Food Security and Extension Policy: Case in Indonesia. In S. Abd El-Kader, & B. Mohammad El-Basioni (Eds.), Precision Agriculture Technologies for Food Security and Sustainability (pp. 275-290). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-5000-7.ch012
Sheil, D & Liswanti, N (2011). Scoring the importance of tropical forest landscapes with local people: patterns and insights, Environmental Management 38 (1): 126-136; DOI: 10.1007/s00267-005-0092-7
Singh, Amarendra Pratap (2015) Ensuring Food Security of Rural People: Some Policy Interventions. MI Journal Vol. 11, No. 2. Retrieved from: http://www.inflibnet.ac.in/ojs/index.php/MI/article/download/3808/3003

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Starting from 2021, the author(s) whose article is published in the Agrisocionomics journal attain the copyright for their article. By submitting the manuscript to Agrisocionomics, the author(s) agree with this policy. No special document approval is required.

The author(s) guarantee that:

Their article is original, written by the mentioned author(s),
Has never been published before,
Does not contain statements that violate the law, and
Does not violate the rights of others, is subject to copyright held exclusively by the author(s), and is free from the rights of third parties, and that the necessary written permission to quote from other sources has been obtained by the author(s).

The author(s) retain all rights to the published work, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:

Copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article, such as patents,
The right to use the substance of the article in its own future works, including lectures and books,
The right to reproduce the article for its own purposes,
The right to archive all versions of the article, and
The right to enter into separate additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of published versions of the article (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.

If the article was prepared jointly by more than one author, each author submitting the manuscript warrants that they have been given permission by all co-authors to agree to copyright and license notices (agreements) on their behalf, and agree to notify the co-authors of the terms of this policy. Agrisocionomics will not be held responsible for anything that may arise because of the writer's internal dispute. Agrisocionomics will only communicate with correspondence authors.

Authors should also understand that once published, their articles (and any additional files, including data sets, and analysis/computation data) will become publicly available. The license of published articles (and additional data) will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently featured on the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Agrisocionomics allows users to copy, distribute, display and perform work under license. Users need to attribute the author(s) and Agrisocionomics to distribute works in journals and other publication media. Unless otherwise stated, the author(s) is a public entity as soon as the article is published.