DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.22.3.400-408

Proses Transaktif, Interaksi Antar Aktor Agen Transfer dalam Pembangunan Lokal

*Muhammad Taufiq orcid  -  Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
Suhirman Suhirman  -  Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
Benedictus Kombaitan  -  Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
Planning as a decision-making tool got intervention from the actors involved in it, through deliberation which is transactive planning and face-to-face dialogue between planners as transfer agents and the community. This situation has resulted in a mismatch between the priority policies for using the budget set at the local level and the implementation guidelines set by the central government. Questions arise how interactions between actors occurred in a transactive process. This article evaluates the interaction between involved actors in the transactive process, which occurs during a practice of local development planning program activity. Evaluations were carried out on village fund program cases in Indonesia, through qualitative approach analysis. The study aims to provide an understanding of the interactions between transfer agent actors during deliberation at the local level. The results show that the interaction between transfer agents conduct through the practice of dominating ideas, which tend to emphasize the dominance of certain parties in prioritizing budget use policies.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: transactive planning; transfer agent; village fund program in Indonesia

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Memahami Pembangunan Ekonomi Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur Berbasis Energi Baru dan Terbarukan Identifikasi Perilaku Perjalanan Melalui Metode Critical Path Method (CPM) Identifikasi Sektor Industri Pengolahan Unggulan Propinsi Jawa Timur (Analisis Input Output) More recent articles
  1. Bland, G. (2011). Supporting post-conflict democratic development? External promotion of participatory budgeting in El Salvador. World Development, 39(5), 863–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.09.010
  2. Cabannes, Y. (2004). Participatory budgeting: A significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environment and Urbanization, 16(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780401600104
  3. Daraba, D. (2017). Pengaruh program dana desa terhadap tingkat partisipasi masyarakat di Kecamatan Galesong Utara Kabupaten Takalar. Sosiohumaniora, 19(1), 52–58
  4. Forester, J. (1982). Planning in the face of power. Journal of the American Planning Association, 48(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368208976167
  5. Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. University of California Press
  6. Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. MIT Press
  7. Friedmann, J. (1973). Retracking America: A theory of transactive planning. Garden City, New York: Anchor Press
  8. Friedmann, J. (2011). Insurgencies: Essays in planning theory. Routledge
  9. Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2001). Deepening democracy: Innovations in empowered participatory governance. Politics & Society, 29(1), 5–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329201029001002
  10. Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. UBC Press
  11. Healey, P. (2003). Collaborative planning in perspective. Planning Theory, 2(2), 101–123
  12. Hudson, B. M., Galloway, T. D., & Kaufman, J. L. (1979). Comparison of current planning theories: Counterparts and contradictions. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45(4), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944367908976980
  13. Huxley, M. (2000). The limits to communicative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(4), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0001900406
  14. Innes, J. E. (1996). Planning through consensus building: A new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(4), 460–472
  15. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2003). Collaborative policymaking: Governance through dialogue. Dalam M. A. Hajer & H. Wagenaar (Ed.), Deliberative policy analysis (hlm. 33–59). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  16. Johansen, P. H., & Chandler, T. L. (2015). Mechanisms of power in participatory rural planning. Journal of Rural Studies, 40, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.05.006
  17. Kemenkeu. (2017). Buku saku dana desa. Jakarta: Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia
  18. Khirfan, L. (2011). From Toronto to Amman: The cross-national transfer of planning knowledge. Planning Theory & Practice, 12(4), 525–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2011.626307
  19. Krenjova, J., & Raudla, R. (2018). Policy diffusion at the local level: Participatory budgeting in Estonia. Urban Affairs Review, 54(2), 419–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087416688961
  20. Kuruppu, C., Adhikari, P., Gunarathna, V., Ambalangodage, D., Perera, P., & Karunarathna, C. (2016). Participatory budgeting in a Sri Lankan urban council: A practice of power and domination. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 41, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.01.002
  21. Luthfi, A., Rini, H. S., Gustaman, F. A., Arsal, T., & Rochana, T. (2017). Partisipasi masyarakat dalam pengelolaan dan pemanfaatan dana desa di Desa Keji Kabupaten Semarang. Matra Pembaruan: Journal of Policy Innovation, 1(2), 121–130
  22. Mamelo, G. Y. R., Kalangi, L., & Lambey, L. (2016). Analisis pelaksanaan dan penatausahaan dana desa pada desa-desa dalam wilayah Kecamatan Kotamobagu Timur, Kota Kotamobagu. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Auditing “Goodwill,” 7(2), 148–159
  23. Taufiq, M., Kombaitan, B., & Putro, H. P. H. (2018). CSR, suatu refleksi perencanaan transaktif: Perspektif filsafat ilmu pengetahuan. TATALOKA, 20(2), 136–147
  24. Tumbel, S. M. (2017). Partisipasi masyarakat dalam pengelolaan dana desa di Desa Tumaluntung Satu Kecamatan Tareran Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan. Politico: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 6(1)
  25. Voogd, H., & Woltjer, J. (1999). The communicative ideology in spatial planning: Some critical reflections based on the Dutch experience. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26(6), 835–854. https://doi.org/10.1068/b260835
  26. Widodo, I. (2017). Dana Desa dan Demokrasi dalam Perspektif Desentralisasi Fiskal. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 2(1), 65–85
  27. Woltjer, J. (2000). Consensus planning: The relevance of communicative planning theory in Dutch infrastructure development. Ashgate

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.