skip to main content

THE DYNAMICS OF LEVERAGE AND PROFITABILITY: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF PRE-TAX EARNINGS

*diana atika ghozali  -  Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Received: 26 Jul 2024; Accepted: 29 Jul 2024; Published: 29 Jul 2024.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 Tax Accounting Applied Journal
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between leverage, profitability, and tax avoidance within the Indonesian banking sector. Utilizing a sample of 48 banks from 2010 to 2022, the study employs a simultaneous equation model to analyze how leverage, measured by Debt-to-Equity Ratio (DER), and profitability, measured by Return on Assets (ROA), influence tax avoidance, represented by the Effective Tax Rate (ETR). The findings reveal that leverage does not have a significant impact on tax avoidance, likely due to high variability in ETR and other dominant factors such as company-specific tax policies and strategies. In contrast, a significant negative relationship is observed between profitability and ETR, indicating that more profitable banks tend to engage in greater tax avoidance. This can be attributed to economies of scale, where larger and more profitable banks can distribute the fixed costs of tax avoidance strategies more efficiently. These results highlight the importance of considering tax avoidance in financial analysis and policy-making, suggesting further longitudinal studies and cross-sector comparisons to enhance understanding of these dynamics
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Leverage, Profitability, Tax Avoidance, Banking Sector, Effective Tax Rate, Debt-to-Equity Ratio, Return on Assets

Article Metrics:

  1. Black, S. E., & Strahan, P. E. (2002). Entrepreneurship and bank credit availability. The Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2807–2833
  2. Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41–61
  3. Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2022). Corporate debt and taxes. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 14(1), 509–534
  4. Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2011). The effect of board of director composition on corporate tax aggressiveness. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(1), 50–70
  5. Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.