DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v8i1.95-118

The Dynamics of the System of Punitive Measures in the Reform of Indonesian Criminal Law The Transformation of the System of Punitive Measures in Indonesia’s New Criminal Code

*Dyah Kusumaningtyas Setiyowati orcid  -  Doctor of Law Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Pujiyono Pujiyono orcid scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Irma Cahyaningtyas orcid scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Putu George Matthew Simbolon orcid scopus  -  Faculty of Law and Criminology, Catholique Université de Louvain, Belgium

Citation Format:
Abstract

This research is motivated by the status of measures under Article 103(1) of the 2023 Criminal Code, which treats measures as provisions that may only be imposed alongside principal criminal sanctions, thereby contradicting the principle of equivalence between criminal sanctions and measures. The objective of this study is to propose how the provisions regarding administrative sanctions in Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code (KUHP 2023) should be strengthened to align with the doctrine of the double-track system. The methodology employed is a normative legal approach, utilising both historical and conceptual perspectives. The research findings indicate that the 2023 Criminal Code has not yet fully implemented the double track system, as the wording of Article 103(1) places measures in a subordinate position to criminal sanctions, thereby hindering the realisation of rehabilitative justice within the Indonesian criminal justice system. Furthermore, Indonesia has yet to issue government regulations providing further guidance on the implementation of measures as mandated by the 2023 Criminal Code. The conclusion that can be drawn is that the wording of Article 103(1) of the 2023 Criminal Code must be revised by removing the phrase that positions measures merely as a supplement to the principal criminal sanction, and Indonesia needs to immediately enact government regulations to ensure the independent application of measures within the national penal system.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Criminal Sanctions; 2023 Criminal Code; Double Track System

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : EN
  1. Ajil, A. (2022). Politico-ideological violence: Zooming in on grievances. European journal of criminology, 19(2), 304-321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370819896223
  2. Alviolita, F. P., & Arief, B. N. (2019). Kebijakan Formulasi Tentang Perumusan Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Law Reform, 15(1), 130–148. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v15i1.23359
  3. Amdani, Y., & Krisna, L.A. (2019). Konsep Meminta Maaf sebagai Hukuman dalam Perkara Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum,26(1),67-90. https://doi.org/10. 20885/iustum.vol26.iss1.art4
  4. Appludnopsanji, A., & Purwanti, A. (2021). Double track criminal system of Indonesia: Criminal sanction and chemical castration treatment policy on pedhofilia? Diponegoro Law Review,6(1),17–32. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.6.1.2021.17-32
  5. Arafat, M. (2025). Paradigma Pemidanaan Baru dalam KUHP 2023: Alternatif Sanksi dan Transformasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.58540/jih.v2i1.1047
  6. Aranggraeni, A., Taufik, M., Fausta, M., & Ilmi, M. B. (2024). State Liability for the Psychics of Death Row Inmates in the Implementation of the Waiting Period for Execution. Electronic Journal of Education, Social Economics, and Technology, 5(2), 391-399. https://doi.org/10.33122/ejeset.v5i2.447
  7. Ardiyanto, F., & Wibowo, A. (2024). Konsep dan Filosofi Pemidanaan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual. Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2(3), 12-23. https://journal.uii.ac.id/psha/ article/view/34715
  8. Aripkah, N., Sanata, K., Asufie, K. N., dan Gegana, R. P. (2025). Pembaruan Konsep Hukum Pidana dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP. Jurnal Fundamental Justice, 6(2), 209-226. https://doi.org/10.30812/fundamental.v6i2.5268
  9. Ayu, S. M., Shaluhiyah, Z., Widjanarko, B., & Purwanti, A. (2026). Rasch Analysis of the General Life Skills Scale for Dating Violence Prevention in Indonesian Adolescents. Media Publikasi Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia, 9(2), 262-273. https://doi.org/10.56338/mppki.v9i2.8555
  10. Barasa, A. R. P., & Saputra, W. (2025). Pembaharuan Sistem Hukum Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology,6(3),156–164. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v6i5.28788
  11. Batista, M. (2023). Bureaucracy and policymaking: Evidence from a choice-based conjoint analysis. Research & Politics, 10(3),1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 20531680231180980
  12. Brown, D. (2019). Community Sanctions as Pervasive Punishment: A Review Essay. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 9(2), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v9i2.1208
  13. Bun, M. J., Kelaher, R., Sarafidis, V., & Weatherburn, D. (2020). Crime, deterrence and punishment revisited. Empirical economics,59(5),2303-2333. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00181-019-01758-6
  14. Corda, A. (2025). The Legitimacy Of Criminal Law And The Performance Crises Of Penality. Criminal Law Forum, 36(2), 351-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-025-09509-2
  15. Dagan, N., & Baron, S. (2025). Lifting the Veil of Ignorance: Prison Cruelty, Sentencing Theory, and the Failure of Liberal Retributivism. Critical Criminology, 33(1), 209-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-025-09812-9
  16. Eggert, L. (2024). Compensating beneficiaries. Philosophical Studies, 181(6), 1681-1701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02150-6
  17. Engelen, P-J., Lander, M. W., & van Essen, M. (2016). What determines crime rates? An empirical test of integrated economic and sociological theories of criminal behavior. The Social Science Journal, 53(2), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2015.09.001
  18. Feriandref, A. C., Ermala, E., Ballan, O., Mubaraq, M., & Aryadi, D. (2026). Transformasi Tujuan Pemidanaan di Indonesia: Systematic Literature Review megnenai Perkembangan Teori, Kebijakan, dan Implementasi Keadilan Restoratif di Era Baru Hukum Pidana. Iuris Studia Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 7(1), 22-33. https://jurnal.bundamediagrup.co.id/index.php/iuris/article/view/1155
  19. Firmansyah, F., & Armin, R. A. (2021). Sanksi/Pidana Kerja Sosial, Telaah Double Track System (Mono-Dualistik/Daad Strafrecht). Madani Legal Review, 5(2), 53-74. https://doi.org/10.31850/malrev.v5i2.1436
  20. Freiberg, A. (2025). Reflections on 50 years of sentencing reform: The good, the bad and the future. Alternative Law Journal, 50(2), 140-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/103796 9X251323921
  21. Ginting, A. G., Simatupang, V. U., & Batubara, S. A. (2019). Restorative justice sebagai mekanisme penyelesaian tindak pidana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Jurnal Rectum,1(2),180–187. https://jurnal.universitasdarmaagung.ac.id/jurnalrectum/article/view/225
  22. Gregorio, E., Kusumastuti, D. A., & Kesuma, I. G. K. W. (2024). Implikasi Pelunakan Pengaturan Asas Legalitas dalam KUHPN terhadap Konsep Hukum yang Hidup Dalam Masyarakat. Jurist-Diction, 7(4), 263-290. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v7i2.56124
  23. Hamja, H., Nunna, B. P., Sutrisno, E., Sambas, N., & Widjajanti, E. (2026). The Potential Application of The Bridging Approach In Community-Based Corrections In Indonesia: A Comparative Perspective. Law Reform,22(1),35-62. https://doi.org/10. 14710/lr.v22i1.71136
  24. Handayani, E., & Hardiyanti, M. (2025). Forging a legal culture: criminal law enforcement in environmental protection amidst the sustainable development era. Clio. Revista de Historia, Ciencias Humanas y Pensamiento Critico, 5(10), 249-281. https:/doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14975866
  25. Hanik, H., & Wahidah, N. (2025). Fungsi Hukum Pidana. Justitia: Journal of Justice, Law Studies, and Politics, 1(1), 8-15. https://ejournal.hamjahdiha.org/index.php/Justitia/article/view/147
  26. Harahap, E. S., Syahrin, A., Mulyadi, M., & Marlina, M. (2024). Penjatuhan pidana tambahan terhadap korporasi yang melakukan tindak pidana lingkungan hidup (Studi Putusan Nomor 349/Pid.B/LH/2019/PN.Plw). Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 3(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v3i1.280
  27. Hartanti, S. (2022). Reformulasi Pengaturan Pedoman Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Pencurian Jaringan Internet Wi-Fi. Brawijaya Law Student Journal, 12(2), 34–52. http://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/4984
  28. Hartanto, S., Utari, I. S., & Arifin, R. (2019). Implementation Of Penal Mediation In The Perspective Of Progressive Law (Study At The Semarang City Police Department). Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies,4(2),161-188. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v4i2.36302
  29. Henham, R. (2022). Sentencing policy, social values and discretionary justice. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 42(4), 1093-1117. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqac011
  30. Hidayat, A. F., & Andriyansa, S. (2025). Dekriminalisasi dan rehabilitasi dalam KUHP Baru sebagai solusi untuk mengatasi overkapasitas lapas di Indonesia. Judge: Jurnal Hukum, 6(4), 1273–1283. https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v6i04.1731
  31. Hucklesby, A., Beyens, K., & Boone, M. (2021). Comparing electronic monitoring regimes: Length, breadth, depth and weight equals tightness. Punishment & Society, 23(1), 88-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474520915753
  32. Jaya, N. S. P. (2016). Hukum (Sanksi) Pidana Adat Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 45(2), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.45.2.2016.123-130
  33. Jhony, R. H. (2011). Tindak Pidana Kekerasaan Terhadap Perempuan (Studi Etiologi Kriminal di Wilayah Hukum Polres Bayumas). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 11(2), 214–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.2.182
  34. Juliani, H. (2016). Pertanggungjawaban Direksi BUMN Terhadap Perbuatan Yang Mengakibatkan Kerugian Keuangan Negara. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 45(4), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.45.4.2016.299-306
  35. Kamalludin, I., Purwanti, A., Sularto, R. B., Berezniak, V., & Liudvik, V. (2025). Designing a Digital Trust Fund for the Justice for Sexual Violence Victims Based on Islamic Criminal Law. Jurnal Hukum Islam,23(2),459-500. https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v23i2.04
  36. Kholiq, A., Arief, B. N., & Soponyono, E. (2015). Pidana penjara terbatas: Sebuah gagasan dan reorientasi terhadap kebijakan formulasi jenis sanksi hukum pidana di Indonesia. Law Reform, 11(1), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v11i1.15759
  37. Kholiq, M. A., & Wibowo, A. (2016). Penerapan Teori Tujuan Pemidanaan dalam Perkara Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan: Studi Putusan Hakim. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM,23(2),186–205. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol23.iss2.art2
  38. Kubrin, C. E., & Tublitz, R. (2022). How to Think about Criminal Justice Reform: Conceptual and Practical Considerations. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 47(6), 1050–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-022-09712-6
  39. Kurniawan, I. (2023). Kriteria Untuk Menenentukan Bentuk-Bentuk Tindak Pidana Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dari Korporasi Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Unes Law Review, 5(3), 1285-1306. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i3.444
  40. Latifiani, D., Yusriadi, Y., Sarono, A., Al Fikry, A. H., & Cholis, M. N. (2022). Reconstruction Of E-court Legal Culture In Civil Law Enforcement. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies,7(2),413. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i2.59993
  41. Laputigar, R., Suhadi, S., & Rodiyah, R. (2024). Integrating Due Process Into The Enforcement Framework of Criminal Law Politics. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies, 9(1), 139-162. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v9i1.36421
  42. Lynch, M. (2023). Prosecutors as punishers: A case study of Trump-era practices. Punishment & Society, 25(5), 1312-1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745231166311
  43. Maharani, N. M. D., & Arsawati, N. N. J. (2025). Analisis yuridis pengaturan sanksi tindakan dalam upaya mengatasi prison overcapacity. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Indonesia,6(2),146-160. https://ejournal.undaris.ac.id/index.php/jpehi/article/view/795
  44. Mahfud, M. A., Siregar, D. M. A., & Malik, M. F. (2026). Nussbaum’s Justice Theory Lens: the Digital Divide and Unfulfillment of the Right to Public Service in Traditional Society. Media Iuris, 9(1), 97-128. https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v9i1.77214
  45. Makaminan, A. A. P., & Soponyono, E. (2021). The Urgency of Criminal Code Bill Ratification in Criminal Law Policy Frame on The Spreading of Pornographic Content Offence. Law Reform, 17(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v17i1.37551
  46. Makhali, I., Darmawan, A., Yudianto, O., & Setyorini, E. H. (2021). Criminal policy against the criminal actions of good name through Social Media. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 19, 280-285. https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/3168
  47. Mears, D. P., & Stafford, M. C. (2025). Gauging the totality of criminal legal sanctions and punishment: Implications for research and policy on retribution and deterrence. Punishment & Society, 27(5), 984-1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745251344576
  48. Mubarok, N. (2024). Sejarah Perkembangan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia: Menyongsong Kehadiran KUHP 2023 dengan Memahami dari Aspek Kesejarahan. Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam,27(1),15-31. https://doi.org/10.15642/alqanun.2024.27.1.15-31
  49. Natalis, A. (2026). Capitalism, Beauty Standards, and the Law: a feminist-foucauldian critique of body regulation. Journal of Philosophical Investigations,20(54),343-362. https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2025.69150.4193
  50. Natalis, A., & Purwanti, A. (2025). Dissecting Masculinity: Transformative Strategies to Address Smoking in Indonesia. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 54(2), 434-444. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v54i2.17915
  51. Nugraha, R. S., Rohaedi, E., Kusnadi, N., & Abid, A. (2025). The Transformation of Indonesia's Criminal Law System: Comprehensive Comparison between the Old and New Penal Codes. Jurnal Reformasi Hukum, 29(1),1-21. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v29i1.1169
  52. Padang, M. A., Siregar, B. J., & Rosmalinda, R. (2024). Keberpihakan pemidanaan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023. Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 4(2), 64–71. https://jurnal.locusmedia.id/index.php/jkih/article/view/348
  53. Paik, L., Giuffre, A., Harris, A., & Shannon, S. (2023). The Long Reach Of Juvenile And Criminal Legal Debt: How Monetary Sanctions Shape Legal Cynicism And Adultification. Children and youth services review,154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107121
  54. Pakpahan, H. (2014). Kebijakan formulasi sanksi tindakan bagi pengguna dalam tindak pidana narkotika. Arena Hukum, 7(2). https://arenahukum.ub.ac.id/index.php/arena/article/view/159
  55. Prasetyo, E. A., Lasmadi, S., & Erwin, E. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dan Penerapan Mens Rea dalam Tindak Pidana Intersepsi di Indonesia. Collegium Studiosum Journal, 7(1), 373-385. https://ejournal.stih-awanglong.ac.id/index. php/csj/article/view/1491
  56. Priamsari, RR. P. A. (2022) Kebijakan Integral Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika. Jurnal Hukum Progresif,10(2),99-111. https://doi.org/10.14710/jhp.10.2.99-111
  57. Puspitasari, I., & Devintawati, E. (2018). Urgensi Pengaturan Kejahatan Korporasi dalam Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Korporasi Menurut RKUHP. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 20(2), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v20i2.10661
  58. Rahman, W., Sudarsono, S., Djatmika, P., Madjid, A., & Rehulina, R. (2024). Discretion of government officials detrimental to state finances: The intersection between administrative illegality and criminal illegality. Law Reform, 20(2), 230-249. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v20i2.64129
  59. Ramadhani, G. S., Arief, B. N., & Purwoto, P. (2012). Sistem pidana dan tindakan "double track system" dalam hukum pidana di Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Journal, 1(4),1-9. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2012.612
  60. Ramadhan, M., & Ariyanti, D. O. (2023). Tujuan pemidanaan dalam kebijakan pada pembaharuan hukum pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Rechten: Riset Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 5(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v5i1.114
  61. Richi, F. N. (2023). Implementasi sistem pemidanaan dua jalur (double track system) bagi pelaku penyalahgunaan narkotika. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum “The Juris”, 7(1),1-15. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v7i1.952
  62. Rifai, E. (2014). Perspektif Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Mimbar Hukum, 26(1), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16056
  63. Rochaeti, N., Hnienkswsatie, A. D., & Sularto, R. B. (2019). Implementasi diversi sebagai sarana non penal dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak di Bapas Surakarta. Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana, 2(2). https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/phpidana/article/view/25032
  64. Rohman, T., & Sugiharto. (2023). Pemidanaan model double track system bagi korporasi dalam tindak pidana lingkungan hidup. Dekrit: Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum, 13(1), 19–47. https://ejournal.fh.ubhara.ac.id/index.php/dekrit/article/view/155
  65. Sabadina, U. (2025). Sanksi Tindakan Dalam Hukum Pidana di Indonesia Perspektif Teori Relatif. UIR Law Review, 9(2), 13-25. https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/uirlawreview/article/view/24937
  66. Sakdiyah, F., Setyorini, E. H., & Yudianto, O. (2021). Model Double Track System Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Penyalahgunaannarkotika Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009. Yustitia,22(1).108-119. https://doi.org/10.53712/yustitia.v22i1.1116
  67. Shabrina, S., & Putrijanti, A. (2022). Online Legal Counselling As Business Strategy: Exploring The Mediating Role Of Notarial Code Of Ethics. Corporate Law and Governance Review, 4(2), 69. https://doi.org/10.22495/clgrv4i2p8
  68. Simbolon, J. R. M., Sinaga, R. P., Rumahorbo, S. T., Simbolon. G., Tarigan, H.D., & Baeha, E. S. (2021). Urgensi Tujuan Dan Pedoman Pemidanaan Dalam Rangka Pembaharuan Sistem Pemidanaan Hukum Pidana. Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan,14(9). https://cibangsa.com/index.php/causa/article/view/3599
  69. Soponyono, E. (2012). Kebijakan perumusan sistem pemidanaan yang berorientasi pada korban. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 41(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.41.1.2012.29-41
  70. Sulistianingsih, D., Adhi, Y. P., Lestari, D. P., & Yusoff, R. B. M. (2025). Dealing with A State of Emergency: A Comparative Study Between Indonesia and Malaysia in Government Use for Pharmaceutical Products. International Law Discourse in Southeast Asia, 4(2), 79-112. Article 29671. https://doi.org/10.15294/ildisea.v5i2.29671
  71. Sulistyawati, S., Purba, N., & Setyawan, I. (2023). Edisi Revisi Implementasi Sistem Sanksi Pidana Dan Tindakan (Double Track System) Terhadap Pelaku Kejahatan Tindak Pidana Narkotika Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Restorative Justice. Publis Penerbit UNPRI Press, 1(1), 1-177. https://jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id/index.php/isbn/article/view/4043
  72. Tomlin, P. (2020). Duffing Up the Criminal Law?. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 14(3), 319-333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-019-09511-x
  73. Ulmer, J. T. (2019). Special Issue: New Theory and Research on Sentencing. Justice Quarterly,36(7),1145–1147. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1687204
  74. Venturi, F. (2025). Reconstructing Criminalisation. Regulatory Crimes and the Authoritarian Foundations of Modern Substantive Criminal Law. Criminal Law and Philosophy,1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-025-09771-w
  75. Wicaksono, M. B. R., & Lestari, A. (2020). Assessing the Rights of Women Victims of Home Violence During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Lex Scientia Law Review, 4(2), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v4i2.40946
  76. Widyawati, A., Arifin, R., Aisy, R., Abidah, S. Q., & Setyanto, H. (2024). Supervision in Integrated Justice: Legal Reform and Constructive Enforcement in the Criminal Justice System. Journal of Law and Legal Reform,5(2),433-458. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.vol5i2.3886
  77. Wijayanti, S. N., Saraswati, R., Wardhani, L. T. A. L., Iswandi, K., & Surana, T. (2025). Constitutional Judges: What Powers Does the House of Representatives Have?. Jurnal Media Hukum, 32(1), 96-113. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v32i1.23842
  78. Yofarrel, M. (2025). Kriminalisasi Berlebihan (Overcriminalization) sebagai Faktor Struktural Overcrowding Lapas dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. UNES Law Review,8(1),151-161. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v8i1.2504
  79. Yuspin, W., & Ajlin, A. (2022). History of the Implementation and Development of the Criminal Law (KUHP) of the Dutch Colonial Heritage in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 5(9),514-520. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v5i9.596
  80. Arief, B. N. (2017). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana: Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru, Edisi Kedua, Cetakan ke-6. Jakarta: KENCANA
  81. Arief, B. N. (2022). RUU KUHP Baru: Sebuah Restrukturisasi/Rekonstruksi Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Semarang: Penerbit Pustaka Magister
  82. Hiariej, E. O. S. (2016). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.