DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v7i1.118-136

Paradoks Perlindungan Kekayaan Intelektual dalam Pencetakan 3D Hasil Desain Artificial Intelligence (AI): Indonesia vs. Vietnam

The Paradox of Intellectual Property Protection in 3D Printing of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Designs: Indonesia vs. Vietnam

*Hari Sutra Disemadi orcid scopus  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Internasional Batam, Indonesia
Agustianto Agustianto scopus  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Internasional Batam, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

The utilization of advanced technologies in the context of digital transformation plays a crucial role in economic progress and growth. However, the use of cutting-edge technologies such as AI and 3D printing must be supported by an adequate legal framework to prevent violations of intellectual property protection principles and avoid harming intellectual property holders. This study aims to explore the issues that may arise from the use of AI and 3D printing technologies. Using a normative legal research method with a comparative approach, this study analyzes the paradox of protection created by these issues, while highlighting the problems found in the legal norms of relevant legal frameworks, such as patent and industrial design regimes. The analysis reveals limitations in the application of the exhaustion doctrine, which could provide balanced protection for the use of these two advanced technologies. Based on these findings, the study offers recommendations for strategic legal development that could be applied by Indonesia and Vietnam, as two ASEAN countries with significant potential in the era of digital transformation.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence; Industrial Design; Patent; 3D Printing; Intellectual Property Protection

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions as Communal Intellectual Property: Are They Protected Under the WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, and Associated Traditional Knowledge 2024? Policy on the Prevention and Handling of Sexual Violence in Higher Education Institutions The Paradox of Intellectual Property Protection in 3D Printing of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Designs: Indonesia vs. Vietnam More recent articles
  1. Akbari, Mohammadreza., & Ha, Nghiep. (2020). Impact of additive manufacturing on the Vietnamese transportation industry: An exploratory study. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, Vol.36, (No.2), pp.78–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2019.11.001
  2. Alawamleh, Mohammad., Shammas, Natalie., Alawamleh, Kamal., & Bani Ismail, Loiy. (2024). Examining the limitations of AI in business and the need for human insights using Interpretive Structural Modelling. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity,Vol.10,(No.3),pp.1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100338
  3. Anwar, Cep Jandi., Suhendra, Indra., Imansyah, Taufik., Zahara, Vadilla Mutia., & Chendrawan, Tony Santika. (2023). GDP Growth and FDI Nexus in ASEAN-5 Countries: The Role of Macroeconomic Performances. JEJAK, Vol.16, (No.1),pp.1–12. https://doi.org/10.15294/jejak.v16i1.37247
  4. Ballardini, Rosa Maria., Mimler, Marc., Minssen, Timo., & Salmi, Mika. (2022). 3D Printing, Intellectual Property Rights and Medical Emergencies: In Search of New Flexibilities. IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol.53, (No.8), pp.1149–1173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-0123 5-1
  5. Budiman, Budiman., & Hammar, Roberth Kurniawan Ruslak. (2024). Legal Protection Of Intellectual Property Rights In Global Business. Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies, Vol.4, (No.1), pp.284–291. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i1.1019
  6. Budi, V. Henry Soelistyo., Girodon-Hutagalung, Matahari., & Irawati, Jovita. (2024). Integrating IPR Integrity and Freedom of Expression: A Normative Analysis. Law Reform, Vol.20, (No.1),pp.153-169. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v20i1.62089
  7. Dewi, Niken Sari., & Suteki, Suteki. (2017). Obstruksi Pelaksanaan Lisensi Wajib Paten Dalam Rangka Alih Teknologi Pada Perusahaan Farmasi Di Indonesia. Law Reform, Vol.13, (No.1),pp.1-17. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v13i1.15947
  8. Disemadi, Hari S. (2022). Lenses of Legal Research: A Descriptive Essay on Legal Research Methodologies. Journal of Judicial Review, Vol.24,(No.2),pp.289–304. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v24i2.7280
  9. Disemadi, Hari S. (2022). Contextualization of Legal Protection of Intellectual Property in Micro Small and Medium Enterprises in Indonesia. Law Reform,Vol.18,(No.1),pp.89-110. https:// doi.org/10.14710/lr.v18i1.42568
  10. Disemadi, Hari Sutra., & Sudirman, Lu. (2025). Human Dignity Vs. Artificial Intelligence (Ai): The Reflection Of Kant's Thought In Considering AI As A Legal Subject In Indonesia. Masala-Masalah Hukum, Vol.54, (No.1),pp.1-12. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.54.1.2025.1-12
  11. Fang, Yu-Min. (2023). The role of generative AI in industrial design: enhancing the design process and education. International Conference on Innovation, Communication and Engineering (ICICE 2023), Vol.2023, (No.45),pp.135–136. https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2024.0303
  12. Ferrero Guillen, Rebeca. (2023). From enemies to allies: 3D printing, IP and sustainability. Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice,Vol.18,(No.5),pp.375–381. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpad040
  13. Febriyani, Emiliya., Syarief, Elza., Seroja, Triana Dewi. (2024). Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligence dalam Deteksi dan Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang: Potensi dan Tantangan Hukum?. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana,Vol.13,(No.4).pp.877-898. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2024.v13.i04.p10
  14. Ha, Huong., & Chuah, CK Peter. (2023). Digital economy in Southeast Asia: challenges, opportunities and future development. Southeast Asia: A Multidisciplinary Journal, Vol.23,(No.1),pp.19–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEAMJ-02-2023-0023
  15. Hapsari, Dwi Ratna Indri., Pratama, Andistya., Hidayah, Nur Putri., & Anggraeny, Isdian. (2024). The Legality of Intellectual Property by Artificial Intelligence in Indonesia. KnE Social Sciences,Vol.9,(No.1),pp.749–759. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i21.14791
  16. Harnowo, T. (2022). Law as Technological Control of the Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights in the Digital Era. Corporate and Trade Law Review,Vol.2,(No.1),pp.65–79. https://doi.org/10.21632/ctlr.2.1.65-79
  17. Hidayah, Farida Nur., & Roisah, Kholis. (2017). Analisis Dampak Kebijakan Pemerintah Indonesia Terhadap Persaingan Perdagangan Jasa Di Bidang Konstruksi Dalam Rangka Masyarakat Ekonomi Asean. Law Reform, Vol.13,(No.1),pp.45-59. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v13i1.15950
  18. Hyunjin, C. (2020). A Study on the Change of Manufacturing Design Process due to the Development of A.I Design and 3D Printing. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering,Vol.727,(No.1),pp.1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/727/1/0120 10
  19. Ishikawa, K. (2021). The ASEAN Economic Community and ASEAN economic integration. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, Vol.10,(No.1),pp.24–41. https://doi.org/10.1080 /24761028.2021.1891702
  20. Jaman, Ujang B. (2024). Intellectual Property Rights in the Growth of MSMEs Ecosystem in Indonesia. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, Vol.5, (No.2), pp.569–584. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijss.v5i2.1190
  21. Jayakrishna, Makka., Vijay, M., & Khan, Baseem. (2023). An Overview of Extensive Analysis of 3D Printing Applications in the Manufacturing Sector. Journal of Engineering, pp.1–23. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7465737
  22. Kantaros, Antreas., Diegel, Olaf., Piromalis, Dimitrios., Tsaramirsis, Georgios., Khadidos, Alaa Omar., Khadidos, Adil Omar., Khan, Fazal Qudus., & Jan, Sadeeq. (2022). 3D printing: Making an innovative technology widely accessible through makerspaces and outsourced services. Materials Today: Proceedings,Vol.49,(No.7),pp.2712–2723. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.074
  23. Khairunnisa, S. (2018). Patent Legal Protection On Invention (Comparation Study Between Indonesia and Japan). Jurnal Hukum Novelty, Vol.9,(No.2),pp.183–191. https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v9i2.a11338
  24. Khalimy, Akhmad., Yusriadi, Yusriadi., Setyowati, Ro'fah., Syahruddin, Syahruddin., & Abdul Wadud, Abdul Muizz. (2023). The Intersection of the Progressive Law Theory and the Self-Declaration Concept of MSEs Halal Certification. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies,Vol.8,(No.1),pp.159–198. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v8i1.66087
  25. Kim, D. (2022). The Paradox of the DABUS Judgment of the German Federal Patent Court. GRUR International, Vol.71, (No.12), pp.1162–1166. https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikac125
  26. Kurniawan, I Gede A. (2022). The Enforcement of Progressive Law: Optimizing Alternative Dispute Resolution as the Implementation of Pancasila Values. International Conference Towards Humanity Justice for Law Enforcement and Dispute Settlement, Vol.1, (No.1),pp.1–11. https://journal.undiknas.ac.id/index.php/icfh/article/view/3927
  27. Lainsamputty, Marcia., Akyuwen, Rory Jeff., & Narwadan, Theresia Nolda Agnes. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Kekayaan Desain Industri Yang DiTiru Dan Diedarkan Tanpa Izin. PATTIMURA Law Study Review, Vol.2,(No.1),pp.61–75. https://doi.org/10.47268/palasrev.v2i1.13779
  28. Le, Van A. (2022). Second Medical Use Patents and Compensation for the Delay in Marketing Authorisations: The Curious Case of Vietnam. GRUR International, Vol.71, (No.11), pp.1048–1055. https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikac095
  29. Le, Van A. (2024). Soviet Legacy of Vietnam’s Intellectual Property Law: Big Brother is (No Longer) Watching You. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, Vol.19, (No.1), pp.39–66. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/asjcl.2023.31
  30. Lubis, Rahmad A. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pemegang Hak Paten yang Terdaftar Lebih Dahulu di Direktorat Paten (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 437K/PDT.SUS-HK/2018). Journal Law of Deli Sumatera,Vol.1,(No.1),pp.13–23. https://jurnal.unds.ac.id/index.php/jlds/article/view/29
  31. Ma, Liang., Yu, Shijie., Xu, Xiaodong., Moses Amadi, Sidney., Zhang, Jing., & Wang, Zhifei. (2023). Application of artificial intelligence in 3D printing physical organ models. Materials Today Bio, Vol.23, pp.1–14. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.mtbio.2023.100792
  32. Mayana, Ranti Fauza., Santika, Tisni., Win, Yin Yin., Matalam, Jamil Aadrian Khalil., & Ramli, Ahmad M. (2024). Legal Issues of Artificial Intelligence–Generated Works: Challenges on Indonesian Copyright Law. Law Reform, Vol.20,(No.1),pp.54-75. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v20i1.61262
  33. Nguyen, Tram., & Li, Tang. (2022). The analysis of counterfeits and their impact on countries’ development. Ministry of Science and Technology, Vietnam, Vol.64, (No.3), pp.55–64. https://doi.org/10.31276/VMOSTJOSSH.64(3).55-64
  34. Noviriska, N. (2022). Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Terhadap Pelaku Ekonomi Kreatif Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta. Jurnal Ilmiah Publika, Vol.10, (No.2), pp. 298–306. https://doi.org/10.33603/publika.v10i2.7630
  35. Pratiwi, Ayu Cahya., Pertiwi, Nabila Riski Laili., & Baihaqi, Abdul Hafidz Al. (2022). The Importance of Understanding Intellectual Property Rights from a Legal Perspective and Its Benefits for Society. Proceedings of Islamic Economics, Business, and Philanthropy, Vol.2, (No.2),pp.100–120. https://jurnalfebi.iainkediri.ac.id/index.php/proceedings/article/view/1124
  36. Putra, Muhammad Deovan Reondy., & Disemadi, Hari Sutra. (2022). Counterfeit Culture dalam Perkembangan UMKM: Suatu Kajian Kekayaan Intelektual. Krtha Bhayangkara, Vol.16,(No.2),pp.297–314. https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v16i2.1151
  37. Setiady, T. (2015). Harmonisasi Prinsip Trips Agreement dalam Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dengan Kepentingan Nasional. FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.8, (No.4), pp.595–613. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v8no4.322
  38. Sirait, P. (2021). Novelty Principle: Paradoks Proteksi Hak Desain Industri di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum To-Ra: Hukum Untuk Mengatur Dan Melindungi Masyarakat, Vol.7, (No.2), pp. 246–266. https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v7i2.2
  39. Sudirman, Lu., & Disemadi, Hari Sutra. (2021). Comparing patent protection in Indonesia with that in Singapore and Hong Kong. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, Vol.29, (No.2), pp.200–222. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v29i2.15680
  40. Sudirman, Lu., & Disemadi, Hari Sutra. (2024). Reconciling Conflicting Norms: Addressing Patentability Challenges in Indonesia’s Virtual Workspaces. Jurnal AKTA, Vol.11, (No.1), pp. 245–262. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v11i1.35694
  41. Sujaini, H. (2023). Digital Transformation in Protecting Intellectual Property Rights in Indonesia. Russian Law Journal, Vol.11, (No.4),pp.259–270. https://www.russianlawjournal.org/index.php/journal/article/view/2364
  42. Sunarto, Gatot., Katmini, Katmini., & Eliana, Agusta Dian. (2023). Efektifitas Biaya Penggunaan Teknologi Pencetakan 3D (Industri 4.0) pada Alat Bantu Ortotik Prostetik. Jurnal Penelitian Kesehatan Suara Forikes, Vol.14, (No.1), pp. 17–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.33846/sf14104
  43. Suryono, Adityadarma Bagus P. (2020). Analisis Perkembangan Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi Ditinjau dari Perspektif Politik Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, Vol.1, (No.7),pp.20–39. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v1i7.229
  44. Tan, D. (2021). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Mengupas dan Mengulas Metodologi dalam Menyelenggarakan Penelitian Hukum. Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial,Vol.8,(No.5),pp.2463–2478. https://jurnal.um-tapsel.ac.id/index.php/ nusantara/article/view/5601
  45. Tan, David., Situmeang, Ampuan., & Disemadi, Hari Sutra. (2023). (Un)Lock and (Un)Loaded: Regulating 3d-Printed Firearms in The Open-Source Era After The 2013 Hysteria. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, Vol.17,(No.2),pp.149–195. https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2023-2-1
  46. Thompson, S. (2017). The Evolution of Southeast Asian Regionalism: Security, Economic Development and Foreign Power Support for Regional Initiatives, 1947-77. JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies),Vol.5,(No.1),pp.1–22. https:// doi.org/10.21512/jas.v5i1.4160
  47. Tung, Tran Thanh., Quynh, N., & Minh, Tran Vu. (2023). Design and fabrication of a gripper propotype for a fruit harvesting machine. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, Vol.23, (No.9), pp.24696–24714. https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.124.22770
  48. Wangsa, Jeanette Jade., Fortunata, Kalam Fransisca., & Hanunisa, Salma Zhafira (2023). Iimpact of Artificial Intelligence on Intellectual Property Rights in Indonesia. Anthology: Inside Intellectual Property Rights, Vol.1, (No.1), pp.52–71. https://ojs.uph.edu/index.php/Anthology/article/view/6689
  49. Mukherjee, S. (2023). Patent Exhaustion and International Trade Regulation (1st ed.). Berlin: Brill
  50. Hoa, Nguyen Q. (2025). Vietnam’s AI Sector in 2025: Regulatory Frameworks & Investment Scope. Retrived from https://www.vietnam-briefing.com/news/ vietnams-ai-sector-in-2025-regulatory-frameworks-and-opportunities-for-investors.html/

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.