Theoretical Perspectives and Current Challenges of Outcome-Based Education Framework

Saima Shaheen


DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijee.1.2.122-129

Abstract


Abstract

Outcome-Based education is a performance-based approach for the curriculum development, a future-oriented learner-centered ‘Empowerment Paradigm’ that empowers and endorses all learners with future success. It is an influential and tempting way of restructuring and reorganizing engineering education. Washington Accord, an International accreditation convention, an independent agreement between signatory organizations to provide an external accreditation to undergraduate engineering programs. The accredited engineering programs that qualify an engineer to enter into the practice of professional engineers are equally recognized and acknowledged by other signatory countries and responsible organizations Pakistan Engineering Council (PEC) is a full signatory to the Washington Accord and a regulatory organization for the accreditation of engineering programs in Pakistan. To keep up the permanent membership status, it is the requirement of PEC to implement Outcome-Based in engineering degree awarding institutes in Pakistan. The main aim of Outcome-Based education in engineering education is to empower engineering students with the essential characteristics required to switch themselves into the engineering profession as a global and professional engineer. The focus of current research is to explore the philosophical and theoretical underpinnings of Outcome-Based education. Moreover, to unveil the current challenges in the implementation of OBE framework in engineering education.

 


Keywords


Challenges, Engineering Curriculum, Outcome-Based Education, Theoretical Perspectives, Washington Accord,

Full Text:

FULL TEXT PDF

References


Bloom, B. S. 1956. "Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain." New York: David McKay Co Inc. The United States of America. Pp. 2-10

Crespo, R. M., Najjar, J., Derntl, M., Leony, D., Neumann, S., Oberhuemer, P., Totschnig, M., Simon, B., Gutierrez, I., & Delgado. K. C. 2010. Aligning Assessment with Learning Outcomes in Outcome-based Education. IEEE Education Engineering 2010, Madrid, Spain, pp. 1239-1246.

Cooke, M., Irby, D. M., & O’Brien, B. C. 2010. Educating physicians. A call for reform of medical school and residency. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Gagne´, R. M., Briggs, L. J. (1974). Principles of instructional design. London: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

King, J.A., and Evans, K.M. 1991. Can We Achieve Outcome Based Education? Integrating the Curriculum. Educational Leadership. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. The University of Minnesota. pp.74-75

Macayan, J. V. 2017. Implementing Outcome-Based Education (OBE) Framework: Implications for Assessment of Students’ Performance. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Review (2017), Vol. 8 Issue 1. Philippine Educational Measurement and Evaluation Association (p.4).

Mager, R. F. 1997. Preparing Instructional Objectives. Georgia: CEP Press

Mahmood, M., and Aziz, S. 2018. Curriculum Development Process at Secondary Level: Analysis of Existing Situation in Pakistan and Proposing a Model. Journal of Research in Social Sciences - JRSS June 2018 Vol: 6 Number 2. P (67).

Malan, S.P.T. 2000. The 'New Paradigm' of Outcomes-Based Education in Perspective. Tydskrif vir Gesinsekologie en Verbruikerswetenskappe, ISSN 0378-5254, Vol 28, pp (22-28)

Morcke, A. M., Dornan, T., Eika, B. 2012. Outcome (competency) based education: an exploration of its origins, theoretical basis, and empirical evidence. Adv in Health Sci Educ, 18: pp. (851–863). Springer Science+ Business Media B.V. 2012,

National Education Policy 2017. Ministry of Federal Education and Professional Training, Government of Pakistan.

National Qualifications Framework of Pakistan 2015. Higher Education Commission, Government of Pakistan.

Pakistan Engineering Council 2014. Manual of Accreditation, Engineering Accreditation Board, Second Edition - 2014 (Ver 1.1), Islamabad, Pakistan

Rajaee. N., Junaidi, E., Taib, S. N.L., Salleh, S. F., and Munot, M.A. 2013. Issues and Challenges in Implementing Outcome Based Education in Engineering Education. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, Vol.1-04. www.ijier.net

Shaheen & Khatoon. (2017). Impact of ICT Enriched Modular Approach on Academic Achievement of Biology Students. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education June 2017, Vol 11, No 1, pp 49-59 http://www.ue.edu.pk/jrre

Spady, W. G. 1988. Organizing for results: the basis of authentic restructuring and reform. EducationalLeadership, 46, pp.4-6

Spady, W.G., and Marshall, K. J. 1991. "Beyond Traditional outcome-Based Education," Educational Leadership, Vol.49 (2), pp.67-72.

Spady, W.G. 1994. Outcome-Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers. Arlington, Va.: American Association of School Administrators. USA

Spady, W. G. 1998. Paradigm Lost; Reclaiming America's Educational Future. American Association of School Administrators. The United States of America.

Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary, Springfield, Mass.: G. & C. Merriam Co., 1953, p. 871.

Williamson, M.C. 2000. A Comparative Analysis of Outcome-Based Education in Australia and South Africa. Masters’ Thesis. Master of Education in Comparative Education. University of South Africa, Pretoria

Wilson, A. 1994. “Pavlov’s Children. A Study of Performance –Outcome Based Education”. J.W. Publishing Company, USA

Years of the Washington Accord 2014; p.9.International Engineering Alliance Secretariat, PO Box 12 241 P +64 4 473 9444, Wellington 6144 F +64 4 474 8933, New Zealand Esecretariat@ieagreements.org, www.ieagreements.org





Published by Faculty of Engineering in collaboration with Vocational School, Diponegoro University - Indonesia.
 
 
  
slot gacor slot