skip to main content

The Political Impact of Dutch Colonial Ethnic Spatial Planning on the Territorial Fragmentation and Existence of the Pakpak Tribe (1842-1942)

*Anna Martyna Sinamo  -  Master Program of History, Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia, Indonesia
Singgih Tri Sulistiyono  -  Master Program of History, Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia, Indonesia
Haryono Rinardi  -  Master Program of History, Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

This article examines the political impact of ethnic spatial planning implemented by the Dutch Colonial government on the existence of the Tapanuli Residency in the Onder Afdeling Pakpak Landen from 1842 to 1942. This study employs the historical method, which includes the heuristic, criticism, interpretation, and historiography stages, and is supported by a sociological approach to analyze social structure and changes. The results show that the establishment of the Tapanuli Residency, as a concrete manifestation of colonial ethnic spatial planning policy, was deliberately designed to divide, separate, and weaken the power of ethnic groups to make them easier to monitor and control. This penetration policy resulted in the fragmentation of the territory of Tanoh Pakpak, which was originally a unified cultural and customary entity based on clan land ownership, into five customary regions (Pakpak Silima Suak). As a result of this ethnic spatial arrangement, the customary territory of Pakpak Silima Suak experienced a highly significant reduction and was administratively split into three different residencies. The Kelasen region was integrated into Batak Landen, Tongging into the East Sumatra Residency, and Boang into Singkil in the Aceh Residency. This fragmentation left the Onder Afdeling Pakpak Landen area consisting of only three suak, namely Suak Pegagan, Suak Keppas, and Suak Simsim. The political impact of this ethnic spatial policy not only weakened the political existence of the Pakpak people at the local level but also degraded their traditional leadership system. The abolition of customary leaders' roles such as the takal aur and pertaki, replaced by the colonial bureaucracy, ultimately threatened the existence of the Pakpak people and triggered deep social, cultural, and economic marginalization in their own ancestral land

Keywords: Tapanuli Residency; Pakpak Silima Suak; Ethnic Spatial Politics; Pakpak Landen Sub-Districts; Regional Fragmentation.

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
  1. Adatrechtbundels: 1919 Series A, No. 25. March 1916–1 May 1919. Kern Collection No. 165, dated 12 December 1923, Koninklijk Instituut. (1919). Martinus Nijhoff
  2. Agustono, B. (2010). Ethnic identity reconstruction: The socio-political history of the Pakpak people in North Sumatra (1958-2008) [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universitas Gadjah Mada
  3. Baldacchino, G. (2012). The lure of the island: A spatial analysis of power relations. Journal of Marine and Island Cultures, 1(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imic.2012.11.003
  4. Batavia Land. (2021, April 19). Louis van Vuuren waterschrijver [Louis van Vuuren water writer]. Flevolands Geheugen. Retrieved June 20, 2022, from https://www.flevolandsgeheugen.nl/page/10830/louis-van-vuuren
  5. Castles, L. (2001). The political life of a residency in Sumatra: Tapanuli 1915-1940. KPG (Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia)
  6. Coleman, R. G. (1983). Pakpak Batak kins group and land tenure: A study of descent organization and its cultural ecology [Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global
  7. Couperus, P. Th. (1855). De residentie Tapanoeli, (Sumatra Westkust) in 1852 [The Tapanuli residency, (Sumatra West Coast) in 1852]. Tijdschrift voor Indische Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde (TBG), 5
  8. Damanik, L. E. (2018). Local politics & ethnic dynamics in the decentralization era in North Sumatra. Simetri Institute
  9. Encyclopaedie van Nederlandsch-Indie [Encyclopaedia of the Dutch East Indies]. (1905). Martinus Nijhoff
  10. Groeneboer, 2002, p. 110, as cited in Sibeth, 1991
  11. Hong, S. J. (2016). The social formation and cultural identity of Southeast Asian frontier society: Focused on the concept of maritime Zomia as frontier in connection with the ocean and the inland. Journal of Marine and Island Cultures, 5(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imic.2016.05.004
  12. Kolonial verslag in Dutch East Indies, uploaded November 4, 2017
  13. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Basil Blackwell. (Original work published 1974)
  14. Pungetti, G. (2012). Islands, culture, landscape and seascape. Journal of Marine and Island Cultures, 1(1), 51–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imic.2012.11.007
  15. Sulistiyono, S. T., Rochwulaningsih, Y., & Masruroh, N. N. (2016). Contest for seascape: Local thalassocracies and Sino-Indian trade expansion in the maritime Southeast Asia during the early pre-modern period. Journal of Marine and Island Cultures, 7(2), 74–93
  16. Sunggono, B. (1998). Research methods (2nd ed.). Rajawali Press
  17. Tanjung, F., et al. (2011). Dairi: In the flash of history. Perdana Publishing

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.