skip to main content

Resistance of the Nahdlatul Ulama Party towards the New Order 1967-1969

*Mahmud Mahmud  -  Master Program of History, Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Dewi Yuliati  -  Master Program of History, Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Alamsyah Alamsyah scopus  -  Master Program of History, Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
This study discusses the resistance of the Nahdlatul Ulama Party (Partai Nadhlatul Ulama/ PNU) towards the New Order government from 1967-1969. This study analyses the process of PNU's resistance to the New Order from 1967-1969. This study uses historical research methods, which consist of four stages of historical research methods, namely: heuristics, source criticism, interpretation and historiography. Using the historical method, this study answers questions regarding the form of PNU's channel of resistance against the New Order and the results achieved against the government during the 1967-1969 period. This study uses the farming community-based resistance theory developed by James Scott. Resistance theory is used to explain the PNU's resistance to the New Order through various existing political channels. The New Order government began to show signs of being anti-democratic by imposing political policies that put pressure on political parties and intervening in the PNU organization's internal realm. PNU's resistance to the New Order government was a reaction to various government interventions and actions that attempted to minimize the role and influence of the PNU. This research resulted in an analysis of PNU's resistance to the New Order, which had a more solid institutional structure through various existing political channels. The PNU's resistance is understood as a self-defence effort against multiple interventions by the government on the PNU's political institutions.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Nahdlatul Ulama Party; The New Order Era; Political Policy

Article Metrics:

  1. Anam, C. (1999). Pertumbuhan dan perkembangan Nahdlatul Ulama. Bima Satu
  2. Anshari, A. (2016). Kemenangan faksi militan; jejak kelam elit Nahdlatul Ulama’ akhir September-Oktober 1965. Khazanah: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora, 14, 1. https://doi.org/10.18592/khazanah.v14i1.1046
  3. Arsip deklarasi tentang demokrasi Pancasila yang ditandatangani tanggal 10 juli 1967 di Bandung. Arsip tanpa nomor kodifikasi koleksi Museum NU Jalan Gayungsari Barat Kota Surabaya
  4. Arsip keputusan presiden No. 183 tahun 1968
  5. Arsip laporan pertanggungjawaban Subchan Zaenuri Ekhsan dalam Muktamar ke-XXV di Surabaya tahun 1971
  6. Arsip risalah keputusan Muktamar NU ke-XXIV di Bandung tahun 1967 bidang organisasi dan aparat-aparat organisasi. Arsip tanpa nomor kodifikasi koleksi Museum NU Jalan Gayungsari Barat Kota Surabaya
  7. Arinanto, S. (1999). Pemilihan umum, demokrasi dan paradigma baru kehidupan politik: beberapa catatan. Unisia, 22(39), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.20885/unisia.vol22.iss39
  8. Budairy, S. (2008, March 12). Subchan ZE: tokoh muda aneka citra. Http://Sbudairy.Blogspot.Com/2008/03/Subchan-Ze-Tokoh-Muda-Aneka-Citra_12.Html
  9. Buku daftar riwayat hidup anggota partai NU. Koleksi Museum NU Jalan Gayungsari Barat Kota Surabaya
  10. Crouch, H. (1999). Militer dan politik di Indonesia. PT. Surya Usaha Ningtias
  11. Dewi, D. S. (2020, March 11). Kontroversi sejarah Supersemar yang diperingati setiap 11 Maret. Https://Tirto.Id/Kontroversi-Sejarah-Supersemar-Yang-Diperingati-Setiap-11-Maret-EEjg
  12. Fealy, G., & Borton, G. (1997). Tradisionalisme radikal: persinggungan NU-negara. LKiS
  13. Feillard, A. (1997). NU Vis-à-vis negara: pencarian isi, bentuk dan makna. LKiS
  14. Firdausi, F. A. (2020, March 7). Kala MPRS melengserkan Soekarno dan menaikan Soeharto. ttps://Tirto.Id/Kala-Mprs-Melengserkan-Sukarno-Dan-Menaikkan-Soeharto-ECRV
  15. Haris, S. (1991). PPP dan politik orde baru . Gramedia Widia Sarana
  16. Isnaeni, H. (2016, March 11). Kontroversi di seputar Supersemar. Https://Historia.Id/Politik/Articles/Kontroversi-Di-Seputar-Supersemar-P0mJ7/Page/1
  17. Jamiluddin, J. (2018). Fenomena Sosial Mikro-Makro Nahdlatul Wathan Era Orde Baru. SANGKéP: Jurnal Kajian Sosial Keagamaan, 1(2), 198–223. https://doi.org/10.20414/sangkep.v1i2.602
  18. Karim, M. R. (1983). Perjalanan partai politik di Indonesia: sebuah potret pasang surut. CV. Rajawali
  19. Konsultasi Presiden Dengan Parpol2. (1969, October 15). Kompas
  20. Kuntowijoyo. (2000). Pengantar ilmu sejarah. Bentang Budaya
  21. Machfoedz, M. (1982). Kebangkitan ulama dan bangkitnya ulama. Yayasan Kesatuan Ummat
  22. Marijan, K. (1992). Quo vadis NU setelah kembali ke khittah 1926. Penerbit Erlangga
  23. Mas’oed, M. (1989). Ekonomi dan struktur politik orde baru 1966-1971. LP3ES
  24. Mun’im, A. (2013). Benturan NU-PKI 1948-1965. Tim PBNU
  25. Naskah sambutan Presiden Soeharto saat diangkat menjadi Presiden ke-2 RI pada Sidang Umum ke-5 MPRS tanggal 27 Maret 1968, ANRI, Pidato Presiden Soeharto 1966-1998 No. 291
  26. Pembitjara setudju Djend. Soeharto presiden penuh. (1968, March 23). Kompas
  27. Penjerdehanaan kpartaian. (1971, June 1). Kompas
  28. Puspitasari, S. H. (2005). Pengalaman Indonesia menuju demokrasi beberapa catalan atas pemilihan umum pada masa orde lama, orde baru dan pasca orde baru. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 12(28), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol12.iss28
  29. Reeve, D. (2013). Golkar sejarah yang hilang . Komunitas Bambu
  30. Refreshing DPR djadi pembitjaraan hangat. (1968, March 23). Kompas
  31. Sjaichu: bisa sadja untuk tjari kambing hitam. (1971, June 1). Kompas
  32. Subchan: biaja pemilu dapat kurang dari Rp. 10 miljard. (1969, October 15). Kompas
  33. Suryadinata, L., & Priyono, A. E. (1992). Golkar dan militer: studi tentang budaya politik. LP3ES (Lembaga Penelitian Pendidikan dan Penerangan Ekonomi dan Sosial)

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.