skip to main content

Michael Riffaterre’s Semiotics on William Shakespeare’s A Madrigal (A Semiotic Analysis on Poetry)

Putri Intan Sari Pradani  -  FIB Udinus, Indonesia
*Sarif Syamsu Rizal  -  Universitas Dian Nuswantoro Semarang, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Abstract

This study is entitled “Michael Riffater's Semiotics on William Shakespeare's A Madrigal (A Structural and Semiotics Criticism on Poetry)”. The purpose of this study is to find out what aspects of Michael Riffaterre's semiotics are composed in William Shakespeare's A Madrigal poem. This study uses a qualitative descriptive method to describe the semiotic aspects, and library research to collect data. In order to achieve the objectivity of this study, the literary study approach used is  structural and semiotic approach. The structural approach directs the description of aspects of the physical appearance and the semiotic approach limits the description of the semiotic aspects in William Shakespeare's A Madrigal. The results of the study show that there are four aspects and their sub-aspects found in William Shakespeare's A Madrigal. The first aspect is the result of Heuristic and Hermeneutic readings and there are three sub-aspects found, namely Syntax Extraction, Morphological Change, and Normative and Semantic Forms. The second aspect is Indirect Expression including three sub-aspects that are found, namely Shifting Meaning, Distorting Meaning, and Creating Meanings. The third aspect is Matrix, Variants and Models. The fourth aspect is Potential and Actual Hypogram.

Keywords: Semiotics; Michael Riffatere; Mandrigal

Fulltext View|Download
  1. References
  2. Faruk. (2012). Metode Penelitian Sastra: Sebuah Penjelajahan Awal. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  3. Nazir. (1999). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia
  4. Perrine. (1974). Literature: Structure, Sound, and Sense. Openlibrary.org
  5. Palgrave, Francis T. 1875 ed. (1824–1897). “Great Books Online: The Golden Treasury”. Bartleby.com: https://www.bartleby.com/106/6.html
  6. Pradopo, Rachmat Djoko. (1999). “Semiotika: Teori, Metode dan Penerapannya dalam Pemaknaan Sastra”. Humaniora
  7. _______. (2003). Beberapa Teori Sastra, Metode Kritik dan Penerapannya. Yogyakarta: Pustidaka Pelajar
  8. _______. (2008). Pengkajian Puisi Analisis Strata Norma dan Analisis Struktural dan Semiotik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press
  9. _______. (2010). Pengkajian Puisi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press
  10. Ratih, Rina. (2016). Teori dan Aplikasi Semiotik Michael Riffatere. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  11. Riffaterre, Michael. (1978). Semiotics of Poetry. Bloomington and Indiana: University Press
  12. Robert Lee. B. (2014). “Descriptive Qualitative Research”. (n.d.). Retrieved from Study.com. Madrigal Poetic Form. https://www.writersdigest.com/whats-new/madrigal-poetic
  13. Salam. (2009). Pembelajaran Menulis Puisi Dengan Metode Michael Riffaterre. http://gerbangpendidikan.blogspot.co.id/2009/01/pembelajaran-menulispuisidengan.html
  14. Surajiyo. (2009). Dasar-dasar logika. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
  15. Suryana. (2010). Metode Penelitian Model Praktis Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Bandung : UPI
  16. Teeuw, A. (1991). Sastra dan Ilmu Sastra dan Pengantar Teori Sastra. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya
  17. Wellek, Rene and Austin Warren. (1984). Theory of Literature. San Diego, New York, London: Harcourt Brace and Company
  18. Literary Device. (n.d). Synecdoche. https://literarydevices.net/
  19. https://literarydevices.net/rhyme/
  20. https://literarydevices.net/enjambment/
  21. https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-typography
  22. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.