skip to main content

An Analysis of an AI-Integrated Student- Centered Promotional Video for Educational Institutions: A Qualitative Descriptive Study

Leni Rohliah  -  Jurusan Bahasa dan Pariwisata, Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia, Indonesia
*Sri Gustiani  -  Jurusan Bahasa dan Pariwisata, Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia, Indonesia
Wirda Ningsih  -  Jurusan Bahasa dan Pariwisata, Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia, Indonesia
Fransiska Amelia Tarigas  -  Jurusan Bahasa dan Pariwisata, Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia, Indonesia
M. Ri’fat Fadhlurrahman  -  Jurusan Bahasa dan Pariwisata, Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia, Indonesia
Harum Maulita  -  Jurusan Bahasa dan Pariwisata, Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study examines the creation and application of an institutional promotional video integrating student-centered scriptwriting and AI voice generation. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness, strengths, and weaknesses of the outcome product from pedagogical and technological perspectives. The study uses a qualitative descriptive design to analyze the product along four dimensions based on four key aspects; content quality, narration, technical quality, and promotional effectiveness. The data were collected through documentation, reflective observation, and review of project records. Findings indicate that the integration of student-centered learning in script development encouraged creativity, collaboration, and ownership, while the use of AI voice technology enhanced cost efficiency and consistency in narration. However, limitations were detected in the emotional expressiveness of the AI- generated voice and the briefness of the video, which reduced narrative depth. The study suggests that integrating student‐centered methods using AI techniques can provide a pedagogically significant and technically interesting model for institutional promotion. Suggested recommendations include the use of hybrid forms, continuing students' participation in post-production, and carrying out studies of audience perception in future research.


Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: AI voice generator; student-centered learning; qualitative descriptive study; institutional promotion
Funding: Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya/07012/PL6.2.1/LT/2025

Article Metrics:

  1. Anderson, L. (2016). Creative learning in the digital age: Project-based approaches to 21st-century skills. Journal of Educational Technology, 12(3), 45–56
  2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597
  3. Brown, H. D. (2008). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Longman
  4. Chen, J., & Luo, Y. (2023). Emotional expressiveness in AI-generated voices: Perception and pedagogy. Computers & Education, 205, 104776
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage
  6. Gao, L., & Wu, H. (2021). Human-like or not? Evaluating expressiveness in AI-generated voices. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 106828
  7. Gao, Q., Zhang, R., & Lee, T. (2022). Storytelling and branding: The power of emotional narratives in institutional promotion. International Journal of Marketing Education, 9(1), 55–68
  8. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson Education
  9. Kurniawan, D., & Lee, S. (2024). Enhancing learner agency through student-centered multimedia projects. Asia-Pacific Education Review, 25(1), 33–49
  10. Lee, M., Park, J., & Zhao, H. (2023). Neural voice synthesis and its pedagogical implications: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(5), 2123–2148
  11. Patel, S., & Singh, R. (2024). Exploring the use of AI voice technology in media and marketing education. Media Education Review, 13(2), 45–63
  12. Rahman, H., & Park, S. (2022). Reframing student-centered learning in hybrid education. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3(1), 100194
  13. Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340
  14. Supriyadi, A., Lim, J., & Nanda, R. (2023). Digital storytelling for student engagement in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(4), 465–479
  15. Zhang, Y., & Yang, X. (2022). Applications of AI in voice synthesis: A review. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 71(2), 215–232

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.