skip to main content

Variability of Data in High Throughput Experimentation for Catalyst Studies in Fuel Processing

1HySA/Catalysis Centre of Competence, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa

2Centre for Catalysis Research, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa

Received: 23 Sep 2016; Revised: 18 Nov 2016; Accepted: 22 Nov 2016; Published: 30 Apr 2017; Available online: 13 Feb 2017.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2017 by Authors, Published by BCREC Group under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Cover Image
Abstract

The use of high throughout and combinatorial experimentation is becoming commonplace in catalytic research. The benefits of parallel experiments are not only limited to reducing the time-to-market, but also give an opportunity to study processes in more depth, by generating more data. To investigate the complete parameter space, multiple experiments must be performed and the variability between these experiments must be quantifiable. In this project, the reproducibility and variance in high throughput catalyst preparation and parallel testing were determined. High-performance equipment was used in a catalyst development program for fuel processing, the production of fuel cell-grade hydrogen from hydrocarbon fuels. Four studies, involving water-gas shift conversion and high-temperature steam methane reforming, were performed to determine the reproducibility of the workflow from automated catalyst preparation to parallel activity testing. Statistical analyses showed the standard deviation in catalytic activities as determined by conversion, to be less than 6% of the average value.

 

 

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: High throughput; Fuel processing; Steam methane reforming; Water-Gas shift; Hydrogen production; Reproducibility

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Articles
Language : EN
Statistics:
  1. Acar, C., Dincer, I. (2015). Impact Assessment and Efficiency Evaluation of Hydrogen Production Methods. International Journal of Energy Research, 39:1757-1768
  2. Farrauto, R., Hwang, S., Shore, L., Ruettinger, W., Lampert, J., Giroux, T., Liu, Y., Ilinich, O. (2003). New Material Needs for Hydrocarbon Fuel Processing: Generating Hydrogen for the PEM Fuel Cell. Annual Reviews of Materials Research, 33: 1-27
  3. Kobayashi, T., Ueda, A., Yamada, Y., Shioyama, H. (2004). A Combinatorial Study on Catalytic Synergism in Supported Metal Catalysts for Fuel Cell Technology. Applied Surface Science, 223: 102-108
  4. Dincer, I., Zamfirescu, C. (2012). Sustainable Hydrogen Production Options and the Role of IAHE. International Journal of Energy Research, 37: 16266-16286
  5. Kolb, G. (2008). Fuel Processing for Fuel Cells, Weinheim, Germany, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co
  6. Ercolino, G., Ashraf, M.A., Specchia, V., Specchia, S. (2015). Performance Evaluation and Comparison of Fuel Processors Integrated with PEM Fuel Cell Based on Steam or Autothermal Reforming and on CO Preferential Oxidation or Selective Methanation. Applied Energy, 143: 138-153
  7. Maier, W.F., Stöwe, K., Sieg, S. (2007). Combinatorial and High-Throughput Material Science. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 46: 6016-6067
  8. Farrusseng, D. (2008). High-Throughput Heterogeneous Catalysis. Surface Science Reports, 63: 487-513
  9. Potyrailo, R., Rajan, K., Stöwe, K., Takeuchi, I., Chisholm, B., Lam, H. (2011). Combinatorial and High-Throughput Screening of Materials Libraries: Review of State of the Art. ACS Combinatorial Science, 13: 579-633
  10. Maclean, D., Baldwin, J.J., Ivanov, V.T., Kato, Y., Shaw, A., Schneider, P. (1999). Glossary of Terms used in Combinatorial Chemistry, International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, 71: 2349-2365

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.