Kinetic Study on the SO2 Adsorption using CuO/γ-Al2O3 Adsorbent

David Bahrin -  Department of Chemical Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jln. Ganesa No. 10 Bandung 40132,, Indonesia
Subagjo Subagjo -  Department of Chemical Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jln. Ganesa No. 10, Bandung 40132,, Indonesia
*Herri Susanto -  Department of Chemical Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jln. Ganesa No. 10, Bandung 40132,, Indonesia
Received: 10 Nov 2015; Revised: 29 Feb 2016; Accepted: 29 Feb 2016; Published: 1 Apr 2016; Available online: 10 Mar 2016.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2016 Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering & Catalysis
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Citation Format:
Cover Image
Article Info
Section: The 2nd International Conference on Chemical and Material Engineering 2015
Full Text:
Statistics: 1051 384

Abstract

Adsorbent CuO/g-Al2O3 for adsorption of SO2 were prepared by impregnating Cu(NO3)2.3H2O solution. Five types of adsorbent were obtained 5Cu (intended Cu concentration of 5%, actual of 4.92%), 8Cu (7.68%), 15Cu(14.13%), 22Cu (20.80%) and 27Cu (25.80%). For activity test, model gas containing SO2 with a concentration of about 0.755 mol/m3 were passed through the bed of 1 gram adsorbent at a flow rate in the range of 1.4-1.8 mL/s. Adsorption of SO2 were carried out at a constant temperature of 300, 350, 400 or 450 °C. Increasing sulfur loadings (gram of sulfur per gram of adsorbent) were observed with increasing adsorption temperatures, but not with increasing Cu content in the adsorbent. Among those types, adsorbent of 8Cu was considered as the best with respect to the sulfur loading (3 g of sulfur per 100 g of adsorbent). Adsorbent 5Cu had actually a better sulfur loading, but it was suspected being contributed also by adsorption of SO2 on Al2O3. The shrinking core model was used in the kinetic study of adsorption using 8Cu and with additional assumption of a spherical particle. Compared to film diffusion and pore diffusion controlling step models, the reaction rate limitation was the best to fit the experimental data. The reaction rate constant for this model at temperatures of 300, 350, 400 and 450 °C were 0.022, 0.038, 0.042, and 0.059 kg.m.mol-1.min-1, respectively. The activation energy was 21.25 kJ.mol-1 and the frequency factor was 2.02 min-1. Copyright © 2016 BCREC GROUP. All rights reserved

Received: 10th November 2015; Revised: 29th February 2016; Accepted: 29th February 2016

How to Cite: Bahrin, D., Subagjo, S., Susanto, H. (2016). Kinetic Study on the SO2 Adsorption using CuO/γ-Al2O3 Adsorbent. Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering & Catalysis, 11 (1): 93-100. (doi:10.9767/bcrec.11.1.425.93-99)

Permalink/DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9767/bcrec.11.1.425.93-99

Article Metrics: (click on the button below to see citations in Scopus)

cited by count 

Keywords
SO2 adsorption; CuO/γ-Al2O3 adsorbent; CuO conversion; shrinking core model

Article Metrics:

  1. Yuono, Bahrin, D., Susanto, H. (2015). Preparation and Characterization of CuO/γ-Al2O3 for Adsorption of SO2 in Flue Gas. Modern Applied Science, 9: 107-113.
  2. Yoo, K.S., Jeon, S.M., Kim, S.D., Park, S.B. (1996). Regeneration of Sulfated Alumina Support in CuO/g-Al2O3 Sorbent by Hydrogen. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 35: 1543-1549.
  3. Macken, C., Hodnett, B.K., Paparatto, G. (2000). Testing of the CuO/Al2O3 Catalyst-Sorbent in Extended Operation for the Simultaneous Removal of NOx and SO2 from Flue Gases. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 39: 3868-3874.
  4. Xie, G., Liu, Z., Zhu, Z., Liu, Q., Ma, J. (2003). Reductive Regeneration of Sufated CuO/Al2O3 Catalyst-Sorbent in Ammonia. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 45: 213-221.
  5. Mathieu, Y., Tzanis, L., Soulard, M., Patarin, J., Vierling, M., Moliere, M. (2013). Adsorption of SOx by Oxide Materials: A Review. Fuel Processing Technology, 114: 81-100.
  6. Flores, R., Rodas, A., Palma, C., Melendez, Y.I., Melendez X.S., Gonzalez, L.L (2008). Thermogravimetric Studies on the Effect of Support in Sorbent-Materials Applied to Flue Gas Desulfurization. Fuel, 87: 1115-1126.
  7. Wittayakun, J., Mahachanon, K., Grisdanurak, N. (2002). Adsorption of Sulfur Dioxide by Copper Oxide Supported on Alumina and Modernite. In Proceedings of Asian Pacific Confederation of Chemical Engineering (APCChE), Christchurch, New Zealand.
  8. Gavaskar, V.S., Abbasian, J. (2006). Dry Regenerable Metal Oxide Sorbents for SO2 Removal from Flue Gas. 1. Development and Evaluation of Copper Oxide Sorbents. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 45: 5859-5869.
  9. Centi, G., Passarini, N., Perathoner, S., Riva, A. (1992). Combined DeSOx/DeNOx Reaction on a Copper on Alumina Sorbent-Catalyst. 1. Mechanism of SO2 Oxidation-Adsorption. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 31: 1947-1955.
  10. Yoo, K.S., Kim, S.D., Park, S.B. (1994). Sulfation of Al2O3 in Flue Gas Desulfurization by CuO/g-Al2O3 Sorbent. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 33: 1786-1791.
  11. Deng, S.G., Lin, Y.S. (1996). Synthesis, Stability, and Sulfation Properties of Sol-Gel-Derived Regeneratif Sorbents for Flue Gas Desulfurization. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 35: 1429-1437.
  12. Yu, Q., Zhang, S.C., Yang, B., Liu, D.C., Xu, B.Q., Ma, W.H. (2009). Preparation of Supported Nano-Copper Oxide and its Sulfanation Kinetics. Transaction of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 19: 757-761.
  13. Yu, Q., Zhang, S., Yang, B. (2011). Dispersion of Copper Oxide Supported on g-Alumina and its Sulfation Properties. Transaction of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 21: 2644-2648.
  14. Askari, Sima, Rouein, H., Nikazar, Manouchehr. (2008). Study and Kinetic Modeling of Direct Sulfation of Iranian Limestones by Sulfur Dioxide at High CO2 Partial Pressure. Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 3: 45-50.
  15. Gbor, P.K., Jia., C.Q. (2004). Critical Evaluation of Coupling Particle Size Distribution with The Shrinking Core Model. Chemical Engineering Science, 59: 1979-1987.
  16. Gavaskar, V.S., Abbasian, J. (2007). Dry Regenerable Metal Oxide Sorbents for SO2 Removal from Flue Gas. 1. Modelling of the Sulfation Reaction Involving Copper Oxide Sorbent. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 46: 1161-1166.
  17. Bahrami, R., Ebrahim, H.A., Halladj, R. (2014). Application of Random Pore Model for SO2 removal Reaction by CuO. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 91: 938-947.