A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of Turbulence, Radiation, and Combustion Models for Natural Gas Combustion Burner

Yik Siang Pang  -  Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Tunku Abdul Rahman University College, Jalan Genting Kelang, 53300 Setapak, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Woon Phui Law orcid scopus  -  Centre of Excellence for Advanced Research in Fluid Flow (CARIFF), Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26300 Gambang, Pahang, Malaysia
Kang Qin Pung  -  Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Tunku Abdul Rahman University College, Jalan Genting Kelang, 53300 Setapak, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
*Jolius Gimbun orcid scopus  -  Centre of Excellence for Advanced Research in Fluid Flow (CARIFF), Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26300 Gambang, Pahang, Malaysia
Received: 26 Jul 2017; Revised: 9 Oct 2017; Accepted: 30 Oct 2017; Published: 2 Apr 2018; Available online: 22 Jan 2018.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2018 Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering & Catalysis
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Cover Image
Article Info
Section: The International Conference on Fluids and Chemical Engineering (FluidsChE 2017)
Language: EN
Statistics: 1427 637

This paper presents a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) study of a natural gas combustion burner focusing on the effect of combustion, thermal radiation and turbulence models on the temperature and chemical species concentration fields. The combustion was modelled using the finite rate/eddy dissipation (FR/EDM) and partially premixed flame models. Detailed chemistry kinetics CHEMKIN GRI-MECH 3.0 consisting of 325 reactions was employed to model the methane combustion. Discrete ordinates (DO) and spherical harmonics (P1) model were employed to predict the thermal radiation. The gas absorption coefficient dependence on the wavelength is resolved by the weighted-sum-of-gray-gases model (WSGGM). Turbulence flow was simulated using Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) based models. The findings showed that a combination of partially premixed flame, P1 and standard k-ε (SKE) gave the most accurate prediction with an average deviation of around 7.8% of combustion temperature and 15.5% for reactant composition (methane and oxygen). The results show the multi-step chemistry in the partially premixed model is more accurate than the two-step FR/EDM. Meanwhile, inclusion of thermal radiation has a minor effect on the heat transfer and species concentration. SKE turbulence model yielded better prediction compared to the realizable k-ε (RKE) and renormalized k-ε (RNG). The CFD simulation presented in this work may serve as a useful tool to evaluate a performance of a natural gas combustor. Copyright © 2018 BCREC Group. All rights reserved

Received: 26th July 2017; Revised: 9th October 2017; Accepted: 30th October 2017; Available online: 22nd January 2018; Published regularly: 2nd April 2018

How to Cite: Pang, Y.S., Law, W.P., Pung, K.Q., Gimbun, J. (2018). A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of Turbulence, Radiation, and Combustion Models for Natural Gas Combustion Burner. Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering & Catalysis, 13 (1): 155-169 (doi:10.9767/bcrec.13.1.1395.155-169)


Keywords: Combustion; Partially Premixed; Radiation; Turbulence; CFD

Article Metrics:

  1. Law, W.P., Gimbun, J. (2015). Influence of Nozzle Design on the Performance of a Partial Combustion Lance: A CFD Study. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 104: 558-570.
  2. Law, W.P., Gimbun, J. (2016). Scale-Adaptive Simulation on the Reactive Turbulent Flow in a Partial Combustion Lance: Assessment of Thermal Insulators. Applied Thermal Engineering, 105: 887-893.
  3. Garreton, D., Simonin, O. (1994). Aerodynamics of Steady State Combustion Chambers and Furnaces. ASCF Ercoftac CFD Workshop, October 17-18, Org: EDF, Chatou, France.
  4. Magel, H.C., Schnell, U., Hein, K.R.G. (1996). Simulation of Detailed Chemistry in a Turbulent Combustor Flow. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 26(1): 67-74.
  5. Isnard, A.A., Gomes, M.S.P. (1999). Numerical Simulation of NOx and CO Formation in Natural Gas Diffusive Flames. In Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Congress of Mechanical Engineering. Aguas de Lindoia, Brazil.
  6. da Silva, C.V., Franca, F.H.R., Vielmo, H.A. (2007). Analysis of the Turbulent, Non-Premixed Combustion of Natural Gas in a Cylindrical Chamber With and Without Thermal Radiation. Combustion Science and Technology, 179(8): 1605-1630.
  7. da Silva, C.V., Segatto, C.A., de Paula, A.V., Centeno, F.R., Franca, F.H.R. (2013). 3D Analysis of Turbulent Non-Premixed Combustion of Natural Gas in a Horizontal Cylindrical Chamber. In Proceedings of the Anais do 22nd Brazilian Congress of Mechanical Engineering. Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil.
  8. Poozesh, S., Akafuah, N., Saito, K. (2016). NO Formation Analysis of Turbulent Non-Premixed Coaxial Methane/Air Diffusion Flame. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 13(2): 513-518.
  9. Ronchetti, B., da Silva, C.V., Vielmo, H.A. (2005). Simulation of Combustion in Cylindrical Chamber. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Mechanical Engineering. Ouro Preto, Brazil.
  10. Karimi, A., Rajagopal, M., Nalim, M.R. (2012). Turbulence-Chemistry Interaction in a Co-Axial Methane Diffusion Flame: Comparison of Reaction Mechanisms and Combustion Models, Technical Report, Spring Technical Meeting of the Central States Section of the Combustion Institute.
  11. Almeida, Y.P., Lage, P.L., Silva, L.F.L. (2015). Large Eddy Simulation of a Turbulent Diffusion Flame Including Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer. Applied Thermal Engineering, 81: 412-425.
  12. Park, S., Kim, J.A., Ryu, C., Chae, T., Yang, W., Kim, Y.J., Park, H.Y., Lim, H.C. (2013). Combustion and Heat Transfer Characteristics of Oxy-Coal Combustion in a 100 MWe Front-Wall-Fired Furnace. Fuel, 106: 718-729.
  13. Wang, J., Xue, Y., Zhang, X., Shu, X. (2015). Numerical Study of Radiation Effect on the Municipal Solid Waste Combustion Characteristics inside an Incinerator. Waste Management, 44: 116-124.
  14. Magnussen, B.F., Hjertager, B.H. (1977). On Mathematical Modelling of Turbulent Combustion with Species Emphasis on Soot Formation and Combustion. In Proceedings of the 16th Symposium (International) on Combustion, 719-729. The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh.
  15. Smith, G.P., Golden, D.M., Frenklach, M., Eiteneer, B., Goldenberg, M., Bowman, C.T., Hanson, R.K., Song, S., Gardiner Jr., W.C., Lissianski, V.V., Qin, Z.W. (2000). Citing Internet sources URL www.me.berkeley.edu/gri_mech.
  16. Peter, N. (1984). Laminar Diffusion Flamelet Models in Non-Premixed Turbulent Combustion. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 10(3): 319-339.
  17. Peter, N. (1999). The Turbulent Burning Velocity for Large-Scale and Small-Scale Turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 384: 107-132.
  18. Siegel, R., Howell, J.R. (1992). Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
  19. Fluent. (2006). FLUENT 6.3 User’s Guide. Fluent Incorporated, New Hampshire.
  20. Gosman, A.D., Lockwood, F.C. (1973). Incorporation of a Flux Model for Radiation into a Finite Difference Procedure for Furnace Calculations. In Proceedings of the 14th Symposium (International) on Combustion, 661-671. The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh.
  21. Miltner, M., Jordan, C., Harasek, M. (2015). CFD Simulation of Straight and Slightly Swirling Turbulent Free Jets using Different RANS-Turbulence Models. Applied Thermal Engineering, 89:1117-1126.
  22. Ilbas, M., Karyeyen, S., Yilmaz, I. (2016). Effect of Swirl Number on Combustion Characteristics of Hydrogen-Containing Fuels in a Combustor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41(17): 7185-7191.
  23. Launder, B.E, Spalding, D.B. (1974). Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 3: 269-289.
  24. Christo, F.C., Dally. B.B. (2005). Modeling Turbulent Reacting Jets Issuing into a Hot and Diluted Coflow. Combustion and Flame, 142(1): 117-129.
  25. Shih, T.H., Liou, W.W., Shabbir, A., Yang, Z., Zhu, J. (1995). A New k-ε Eddy Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows. Computers and Fluids, 24(3): 227-238.
  26. Yakhot, V., Orszag, S.A. (1986). Renormalization Group Analysis of Turbulence I: Basic Theory. Journal of Scientific Computing, 1: 3-51.
  27. Andersson, B., Andersson, R., Hakansson, L., Mortensen, M., Sudiyo, R., Wachem, B.V. (2012). Computational Fluid Dynamics for Engineers. Cambridge University Press, New York.

No citation recorded.