Simulation Study of a Membrane Reactor for Ultrapure Hydrogen Recovery from Methanol Steam Reforming Reaction under Periodic Steady-State

Copyright (c) 2018 Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering & Catalysis
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Cover Image

Article Metrics: (Click on the Metric tab below to see the detail)

Article Info
Submitted: 15-07-2017
Published: 11-06-2018
Section: Original Research Articles
Fulltext PDF Tell your colleagues Email the author

Steam reforming of methanol over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst was theoretically studied under created unsteady state. A mathematical approach was proposed to evaluate the effect of periodic inputs on reactor performance. The efficacy of the periodic separating reactor in term of pure hydrogen and of methanol conversion was measured during the reaction of methanol steam reforming. The obtained results showed that under certain operating conditions the periodic operation can be used advantageously to increase the reactor ability up to a level higher than the maximal steady-state. Moreover, our findings showed that the pumping of hydrogen through the membrane was stimulated by the effect of periodic operations. The predicted results suggested that the created unsteady state mode by using a square wave function could give the better performances compared to the sinusoidal mode. Copyright © 2018 BCREC Group. All rights reserved

Received: 15th July 2017; Revised: 26th November 2017; Accepted: 8th December 2017; Available online: 11st June 2018; Published regularly: 1st August 2018

How to Cite: Chibane, L. (2018). Simulation Study of a Membrane Reactor for Ultrapure Hydrogen Recovery from Methanol Steam Reforming Reaction under Periodic Steady-State. Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering & Catalysis, 13 (2): 275-285 (doi:10.9767/bcrec.13.2.1340.275-285)



hydrogen production; methanol conversion; membrane reactor; periodic operation; unsteady state

  1. Lemnouer Chibane 
    Laboratoire de Génie des Procédés Chimiques (LGPC), Département de Génie des Procédés, Faculté de Technologie, Université Ferhat Abbas, Sétif 1, Algeria
  1. Cheng, W.H. (1999). Development of methanol decomposition catalysts for production of H2 and CO. Accounts of Chemical. Research, 32: 685-691.
  2. Yong, S.T., Hidajat, K., Kawi, S. (2004). Reaction study of autothermal steam reforming of methanol to hydrogen use a novel nano CuZnAl-catalyst. Journal of Power Sources, 131: 91-95.
  3. Ersoza, A., Olguna, H., Ozdogan, S., Gungora, C., Akguna, F., Tırıs, M. (2003). Autothermal reforming as a hydrocarbon fuel processing option for PEM fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources,118: 384-392.
  4. Chin, Y.H., Robert, D., Hu, J., Alice, C.D., Wang, Y. (2002). Steam reforming of methanol over highly active Pd/ZnO catalyst. Catalysis Today, 77: 79-88.
  5. Kruger, P. (2001). Electric power requirement for large-scale production of hydrogen fuel for the world vehicle fleet. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 26: 1137-1147.
  6. Giunta, P., Mosquera, C., Amadeo, N., Labrode, M. (2007). Simulation of a hydrogen production and purification system for a PEM fuel cell using bioethanol as raw material. Journal of Power Sources, 164: 336-343.
  7. Hamelinck, C.N., Andre, P.C.F. (2002). Future prospects for production of methanol and hydrogen from biomass. Journal of Power Sources, 111: 1-22.
  8. Levin, D.B., Chahine, R. (2010). Challenges for renewable hydrogen production from biomass. International Journal of Hydrogen energy, 35: 4962-4969.
  9. Perna, A. (2007). Hydrogen from ethanol: Theoretical optimization of a PEMFC system integrated with a steam reforming processor. International Journal of Hydrogen energy, 32: 1811-1819.
  10. Brown, L.F. (2001). A comparative study of fuels for on-board hydrogen production for fuel-cell-powered automobiles. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 26: 381-397.
  11. Holladay, J.D., Wang, Y., Jones, E. 2004). Review of developments in portable hydrogen production using microreactor technology. Chemical Reviews, 104: 4767-4790.
  12. Harold, M.P., Nair, B., Kolios, G. (2003). Hydrogen generation in a Pd membrane fuel processor: assessment of methanol-based reaction systems. Chemical Engineering Science, 58: 2551-2571.
  13. Sun, J., Qiu, X.P., Wu, F., Zhu, W.T. (2005). H2 from steam reforming of ethanol at low temperature over Ni/Y2O3, Ni/La2O3 and Ni/Al2O3 catalysts for fuel-cell application. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 30: 437-445.
  14. Wang, G., Wang, F., Li, L., Zhang, G. (2013). A study of methanol steam reforming on distributed catalyst bed. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38: 10788-10794.
  15. Mateos-Pedrero, C., Silva, H., Pacheco-Tanaka, D.A., Liguori, S., Iulianelli, A., Basile, A., Mendes, A. (2015). CuO/ZnO catalysts for methanol steam reforming: The role of the support polarity ratio and surface area. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 174-175: 67-76.
  16. Gribovskiy, A.G., Makarshin, L.L., Andreev, D.V., Klenov, O.P., Parmon, V.N. (2015). Thermally autonomous microchannel reactor to produce hydrogen in steam reforming of methanol. Chemical Engineering Journal 273: 130-137.
  17. Holladay, J.D., Hu, J., King, D.L., Wang, Y. (2009). An overview of hydrogen production technologies. Catalysis Today, 139: 244-260.
  18. Armor, J.N. (1998). Applications of catalytic inorganic membrane reactors to refinery product. Journal of Membrane Science, 147: 217-233.
  19. Chibane, L., Djellouli, B. (2012). Role of periodic input composition and sweeping gas for improvement of hydrogen production in a palladium membrane reactor by partial oxidation of methane. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 20: 577-588.
  20. Aida, T., Silveston, P.L. (2005). Periodic operation in: “cyclic separating reactors”. Blackwell publishing Ltd.
  21. Peppley, B.A., Amphlett, J.C., Kearns, L.M., Mann, R.F. (1999). Methanol-steam reforming on Cu/ZnO/Al2O3. Part 1: the reaction network. Applied Catalysis A: General, 179: 21-29.
  22. Peppley, B.A., Amphlett, J.C., Kearns, L.M., Mann, R.F. (1999). Applied Catalysis A: General, 179: 31-49.
  23. Asprey, S.P., Wojciechowski, B.W., Peppley, B.A. (1999). Kinetic studies using temperature-scanning: the steam-reforming of methanol. Applied Catalysis A: General, 179: 51-70.
  24. Agarwal, V., Patel, S., Pant, K.K. (2005). H2 production by steam reforming of methanol over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts: transient deactivation kinetics modeling. Applied Catalysis A: General, 279: 155-164.
  25. Jiang, Y.L., Lim, M.S., Kim, D.H. (2001). Simulation studies of the hydrogen from methanol partial oxidation steam reforming by a tubular packed-bed reactor. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 9: 297-305.
  26. Israni, S.H., Harold, M.P. (2011). Methanol steam reforming in single-fiber packed bed Pd-Ag membrane reactor: Experiments and modeling. Journal of Membrane Science, 369: 375-387.
  27. Pedernera, M.N., Pina, J., Borio, D.O. (2007). Kinetic evaluation of carbon formation in a membrane reactor for methane reforming. Chemical Engineering Journal, 134: 138-144.
  28. Ji, P., van der Kooi, H.J., de Swaan Arnos, J. (2003). Simulation and thermodynamic analysis of conventional and oxygen permeable CPO reactors. Chemical Engineering Science, 58: 2921-2930.
  29. Froment, G.F., Bischoff, K.B. (1979). Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design, John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  30. Krishna, B., Nair, R., Harold, M.P. (2006). Hydrogen generation in a Pd membrane fuel processor: Productivity effects during methanol steam reforming. Chemical Engineering Science 61: 6616-6636.
  31. Tiemersma, T.P., Patil, C.S., van Sint Annaland, M., Kuipers, J.A.M. (2006). Modelling of packed bed membrane reactors for autothermal production of ultrapure hydrogen. Chemical Engineering Science, 61: 1602-1616.
  32. Basile, A., Paturzo, L., Lagana, F. (2001). The partial oxidation of methane to syngas in a palladium membrane reactor: simulation and experimental studies. Catalysis Today, 67: 65-75.
  33. Finlayson, B.A. (1980). Nonlinear Analysis in Chemical Engineering. McGraw-Hill New York.