skip to main content

Development of Reaction Kinetics Model for the Production of Synthesis Gas from Dry Methane Reforming

1Department of Sustainable and Renewable Energy Engineering, University of Sharjah, 27272 Sharjah, United Arab Emirates., United Arab Emirates

2Biomass & Bioenergy Research Group, Center for Sustainable Energy and Power Systems Research, Research Institute of Sciences and Engineering, University of Sharjah, 27272 Sharjah, United Arab Emirates

3Chemical Engineering Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar, 31750 Tronoh, Perak, Malaysia

4 Department of Chemical & Petroleum Engineering, United Arab Emirates University (UAEU), Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates

5 School of Chemical & Materials Engineering, National University of Sciences & Technology, 44000, Islamabad, Pakistan

View all affiliations
Received: 3 Mar 2021; Revised: 1 May 2021; Accepted: 5 May 2021; Available online: 6 May 2021; Published: 30 Jun 2021.
Editor(s): Istadi Istadi, Mohd Asmadi Mohammed Yussuf, Salman Raza Naqvi, Nor Saidina-Amin
Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 by Authors, Published by BCREC Group
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Cover Image
Abstract

The energy supply systems dependent on fossils and municipal solid waste (MSW) materials are primarily responsible for releasing greenhouse (GHG) gases and their related environmental hazards. The increasing amount of methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) is the scientific community's main concern in this context. Reduction in the emission amount of both gases combined with the conversion technologies that would convert these total threat gases (CO2 and CH4) into valuable feedstocks will significantly lower their hazardous impact on climate change. The conversion technique known as dry methane reforming (DMR) utilizes CO2 and CH4 to produce a combustible gas mixture (CO+H2), popularly known as synthesis gas/or syngas. Therefore, this research study aims to explore and enlighten the characteristics of the DMR mechanism. The conversion behaviour of CO2 and CH4 was studied with modelling and simulation of the DMR process using MATLAB. The results showed that inlet gas flow has a significant impact on the reactions. In contrast, the inlet molar composition ratio of the reactions was found to have no substantial effect on the mechanism of DMR. Copyright © 2021 by Authors, Published by BCREC Group. This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0).

 

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Greenhouse gases; Synthesis gas; Dry Methane Reforming; Reaction Kinetics Modelling
Funding: University of Sharjah

Article Metrics:

  1. Wilhelm, D.J., Simbeck, D.R., Karp, A.D., Dickenson, R.L. (2001). Syngas production for gas-to-liquids applications: technologies, issues and outlook. Fuel Processing Technology, 71(1), 139-148. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-3820(01)00140-0
  2. Inayat, A., Inayat, M., Shahbaz, M., Sulaiman, S.A., Raza, M., Yusup, S. (2020). Parametric analysis and optimization for the catalytic air gasification of palm kernel shell using coal bottom ash as catalyst. Renewable Energy, 145, 671-681. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.104
  3. Inayat, A., Ghenai, C., Naqvi, M., Ammar, M., Ayoub, M., & Hussin, M.N.B. (2017). Parametric Study for Production of Dimethyl Ether (DME) As a Fuel from Palm Wastes. Energy Procedia, 105, 1242-1249. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.431
  4. Shahbaz, M., Yusup, S., Pratama, A., Inayat, A., Patrick, D.O., Ammar, M. (2016). Parametric Study and Optimization of Methane Production in Biomass Gasification in the Presence of Coal Bottom Ash. Procedia Engineering, 148, 409-416. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.432
  5. Chaos, M., Dryer, F.L. (2008). Syngas Combustion Kinetics and Applications. Combustion Science and Technology, 180(6), 1053-1096. DOI: 10.1080/00102200801963011
  6. Chen, L., Qi, Z., Zhang, S., Su, J., Somorjai, G.A. (2020). Catalytic Hydrogen Production from Methane: A Review on Recent Progress and Prospect. Catalysts, 10(8), 858. DOI: 10.3390/catal10080858
  7. Kaiwen, L., Bin, Y., Tao, Z. (2018). Economic analysis of hydrogen production from steam reforming process: A literature review. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 13(2), 109-115. DOI: 10.1080/15567249.2017.1387619
  8. Abdulrasheed, A., Jalil, A.A., Gambo, Y., Ibrahim, M., Hambali, H.U., Shahul Hamid, M. Y. (2019). A review on catalyst development for dry reforming of methane to syngas: Recent advances. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 108, 175-193. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.054
  9. Zhao, X., Joseph, B., Kuhn, J., Ozcan, S. (2020). Biogas Reforming to Syngas: A Review. iScience, 23(5), 101082. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101082
  10. Morgan, E.R., Manwell, J.F., McGowan, J.G. (2017). Sustainable Ammonia Production from U.S. Offshore Wind Farms: A Techno-Economic Review. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 5(11), 9554-9567. DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02070
  11. Guczi, L., Stefler, G., Geszti, O., Sajó, I., Pászti, Z., Tompos, A., Schay, Z. (2010). Methane dry reforming with CO2: A study on surface carbon species. Applied Catalysis A: General, 375(2), 236-246. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2009.12.040
  12. Yunus, M.K., Ahmad, M.M., Inayat, A., Yusup, S. (2010). Simulation of enhanced biomass gasification for hydrogen production using iCON. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 62, 661-667
  13. Lavoie, J.-M. (2014). Review on dry reforming of methane, a potentially more environmentally-friendly approach to the increasing natural gas exploitation. Frontiers in Chemistry, 2, 81. DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2014.00081
  14. Aramouni, N.A.K., Touma, J.G., Tarboush, B.A., Zeaiter, J., Ahmad, M.N. (2018). Catalyst design for dry reforming of methane: Analysis review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 2570-2585. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.076
  15. Hossain, M.A., Ayodele, B.V., Cheng, C.K., Khan, M.R. (2018). Syngas production from catalytic CO2 reforming of CH4 over CaFe2O4 supported Ni and Co catalysts: Full factorial design screening. Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering & Catalysis, 13(1), 57-73. DOI: 10.9767/bcrec.13.1.1197.57-73
  16. Messaoudi, H., Thomas, S., Slyemi, S., Djaidja, A., Barama, A. (2020). Syngas production via methane dry reforming over La-Ni-Co and La-Ni-Cu catalysts with spinel and perovskite structures. Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering & Catalysis, 15(3), 885-897. DOI: 10.9767/BCREC.15.3.9295.885-897
  17. Pino, L., Italiano, C., Laganà, M., Vita, A., Recupero, V. (2020). Kinetic study of the methane dry (CO2) reforming reaction over the Ce0.70La0.20Ni0.10O2−δ catalyst. Catalysis Science & Technology, 10(8), 2652-2662. DOI: 10.1039/C9CY02192B
  18. Nagase, K., Shimodaira, T., Itoh, M., Zheng, Y. (1999). Kinetics and mechanisms of the reverse Boudouard reaction over metal carbonates in connection with the reactions of solid carbon with the metal carbonates. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 1(24), 5659-5664. DOI: 10.1039/A906687J
  19. Khan, Z., Inayat, A., Yusup, S., Ahmad, M.M. (2015). Kinetic parameters determination using optimization approach in integrated catalytic adsorption steam gasification for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 40(29), 8824-8832. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.05.069
  20. Inayat, A., Ahmad, M.M., Mutalib, M.I.A., Yusup, S. (2012). Process modeling for parametric study on oil palm empty fruit bunch steam gasification for hydrogen production. Fuel Processing Technology, 93(1), 26-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.08.014
  21. Inayat, A., Khan, Z., Aslam, M., Shahbaz, M., Ahmad, M.M., Abdul Mutalib, M.I., Yusup, S. (2020). Integrated adsorption steam gasification for enhanced hydrogen production from palm waste at bench scale plant. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, (In Press Article). DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.008
  22. Al-Ali, K., Kodama, S., Sekiguchi, H. (2014). Modeling and simulation of methane dry reforming in direct-contact bubble reactor. Solar Energy, 102, 45-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2014.01.010

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.