QUALITY CONTROL OF EDEL COCOA (COCOA PRECIOUS) AT PT. PERKEBUNAN NUSANTARA XII (PERSERO) BANJARSARI GARDEN JEMBER REGENCY

Dwi Putri Jeng Ivo Nurun Nisa'; Mohamad Harisudin; Isti Khomah

doi:10.14710/agrisocionomics.v5i2.8931

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/agrisocionomics.v5i2.8931

QUALITY CONTROL OF EDEL COCOA (COCOA PRECIOUS) AT PT. PERKEBUNAN NUSANTARA XII (PERSERO) BANJARSARI GARDEN JEMBER REGENCY

*Dwi Putri Jeng Ivo Nurun Nisa' - Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Mohamad Harisudin - Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Isti Khomah - Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{Agrisocionomics8931,
    author = {Dwi Putri Nurun Nisa' and Mohamad Harisudin and Isti Khomah},
    title = {QUALITY CONTROL OF EDEL COCOA (COCOA PRECIOUS) AT PT. PERKEBUNAN NUSANTARA XII (PERSERO) BANJARSARI GARDEN JEMBER REGENCY},
    journal = {Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian},
  volume = {5},
    number = {2},
    year = {2021},
    keywords = {edel cocoa beans, ptpn xii (persero) banjarsari garden, quality, statistical quality control (sqc)},
    abstract = {     This research aims to   (1) knowing the defects of the   edel   cocoa beans (2) knowing the defects of the   edel   cocoa beans in the Banjarsari garden were still within the control limit or not (3) knowing the dominant defects, and (4) analyzing the causes and proposed actions to improve the defects of the   edel   cocoa beans in PTPN XII (Persero) Kebun Banjarsari. The basic method of research is descriptive analytical. The method of determining key informants and respondents was carried out by purposive sampling. The results showed that (1) The defects of the   edel   cocoa beans consisted of 2753.2 kg of prongkol beans, 2143.2 kg of broken beans, 1898.47 kg of black skin seeds, 1667.34 kg of cocoa beans, moldy seeds (moldy) as much as 34.193 kg, and insect seeds as much as 0.69 kg. (2) Chart analysis found that the quality tolerance limits of   edel   cocoa beans varied for 5 years, Deviation of defects in   edel   cocoa occurred in the 9th month (September 2015) and the 53rd month (August 2019). (3) Pareto diagram analysis, the dominant defects in   edel   cocoa beans are prongkol, crushed beans and black skin beans. (4) The Fishbone diagram identifies the factors that cause   edel   cocoa bean defects are method, human, material, environment. Proposed remedial action for each of the factors must be implemented immediately to overcome the dominant damage problem. The recommendation given is to hold routine training at least once a month, the company to take alternative actions by planting diversified cover  crops, improving cleanliness regularly, performing sanitation and cleaning weeds around the garden area.    },
   issn = {2621-9778},   pages = {75--88}  doi = {10.14710/agrisocionomics.v5i2.8931},
    url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/agrisocionomics/article/view/8931}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

This research aims to (1) knowing the defects of the edel cocoa beans (2) knowing the defects of the edel cocoa beans in the Banjarsari garden were still within the control limit or not (3) knowing the dominant defects, and (4) analyzing the causes and proposed actions to improve the defects of the edel cocoa beans in PTPN XII (Persero) Kebun Banjarsari. The basic method of research is descriptive analytical. The method of determining key informants and respondents was carried out by purposive sampling. The results showed that (1) The defects of the edel cocoa beans consisted of 2753.2 kg of prongkol beans, 2143.2 kg of broken beans, 1898.47 kg of black skin seeds, 1667.34 kg of cocoa beans, moldy seeds (moldy) as much as 34.193 kg, and insect seeds as much as 0.69 kg. (2) Chart analysis found that the quality tolerance limits of edel cocoa beans varied for 5 years, Deviation of defects in edel cocoa occurred in the 9th month (September 2015) and the 53rd month (August 2019). (3) Pareto diagram analysis, the dominant defects in edel cocoa beans are prongkol, crushed beans and black skin beans. (4) The Fishbone diagram identifies the factors that cause edel cocoa bean defects are method, human, material, environment. Proposed remedial action for each of the factors must be implemented immediately to overcome the dominant damage problem. The recommendation given is to hold routine training at least once a month, the company to take alternative actions by planting diversified cover crops, improving cleanliness regularly, performing sanitation and cleaning weeds around the garden area.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: edel cocoa beans, ptpn xii (persero) banjarsari garden, quality, statistical quality control (sqc)

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 5, No 2 (2021): November 2021

Recent articles

AFFECTING FACTORS OF THE JAJANG AND RIMBA MAS FARMERS GROUP ACTIVITY IN GERBO VILLAGE QUALITY CONTROL OF EDEL COCOA (COCOA PRECIOUS) AT PT. PERKEBUNAN NUSANTARA XII (PERSERO) BANJARSARI GARDEN JEMBER REGENCY PRICE VOLATILITY OF RED CHILI PEPPERS IN CENTRAL JAVA More recent articles

Badan Pusat Statistik. 2018. Statistik Kakao Indonesia. Badan Pusat Statistik, Jakarta
D, Anom, Yuarini. I, Satriawan, dan I, Oka Suardi. 2015. Strategi Peningkatan Kualitas Produk Sayuran Segar Organik pada CV. Golden Leaf Farm Bali. J. Manajemen Agribisnis. 3 (2) : 26297
Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan. 2019. Outlook Komoditas Pertanian Perkebunan. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 53 (9) : 1689-1699
E, Respati. W, Komalasari, S, Wahyuningsih et al. 2015. Buletin Triwulanan Ekspor Impor Komoditas Pertanian. 8 (1) : 16. Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi Pertanian Kementrian Pertanian Republik Indonesia, Jakarta
Gitlow, Hoerd S, Shelly J. Gitlow. 1995. Total Quality Management in Action-Combines. Deming’s Philosophy and Japaness Management System. Prentice-Hall, Inc, USA
H, Tannady. 2015. Pengendalian Kualitas. Graha Ilmu, Jakarta
H. Supriyanto. 2012. Teknologi Cokelat. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogjakarta
J.R, Weenas. 2013. Kualitas Produk, Harga, Promosi Dan Kualitas Pelayanan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Spring Bed Comforta. J.Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi. 1 (4) : 607-618
J, Towaha. D.E, Rubiyo. 2012. Keragaan Mutu Biji Kakao dan Produk Turunannya pada Berbagai Tingkat Fermentasi : Studi Kasus di Tabanan, Bali. J. Pelita Perkebunan 28 (3) : 166-183
Jacob, F.R dan R.B. Chase. 2015. Operation Management and Supply Chain. Pendidikan Mgraw-Hill, Inggris
Krajewski, L.J.L.P. Ritzman, dan M.K.Malhotra. 2013. Operations Management. Pearson Education Limited, Halow
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perkebunan. 2010. Budidaya dan Pasca Panen Kakao. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perkebunan, Bogor
R. Manalu. 2018. Pengolahan Biji Kakao Produksi Perkebunan Rakyat Untuk Meningkatkan Pendapatan Petani. J. Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Publik. 9 : 99-111
Rubiyo. 2013. Inovasi Teknologi Perbaikan Bahan Tanam Kakao di Indonesia. J. Inovasi Teknologi Perbaikan Bahan Tanam Kakao di Indonesia. Buletin RISTRI 4 (3) : 199-214
S. Bakhtiar S. Tahir, dan R. Hasni. 2013. Analisa Pengendalian Kualitas Dengan Menggunakan Metode Statistical Quality Control (SQC). J. MIEJ. 2 (1) : 29—36
Schwan, RF, dan Fleet, GH (Eds). 2014. Fermentasi Kakao dan Kopi. CRC Press
Stevenson, W.J. dan S.C.Choung. 2014. Manajemen Operasi Perspektif Asia. Salemba Empat, Jakarta
Wirartha I. M. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi. Andi Press, Yogjakarta
U,Silalahi. 2006. Metode Penelitian Sosial. Unpar Press

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Starting from 2021, the author(s) whose article is published in the Agrisocionomics journal attain the copyright for their article. By submitting the manuscript to Agrisocionomics, the author(s) agree with this policy. No special document approval is required.

The author(s) guarantee that:

Their article is original, written by the mentioned author(s),
Has never been published before,
Does not contain statements that violate the law, and
Does not violate the rights of others, is subject to copyright held exclusively by the author(s), and is free from the rights of third parties, and that the necessary written permission to quote from other sources has been obtained by the author(s).

The author(s) retain all rights to the published work, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:

Copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article, such as patents,
The right to use the substance of the article in its own future works, including lectures and books,
The right to reproduce the article for its own purposes,
The right to archive all versions of the article, and
The right to enter into separate additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of published versions of the article (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.

If the article was prepared jointly by more than one author, each author submitting the manuscript warrants that they have been given permission by all co-authors to agree to copyright and license notices (agreements) on their behalf, and agree to notify the co-authors of the terms of this policy. Agrisocionomics will not be held responsible for anything that may arise because of the writer's internal dispute. Agrisocionomics will only communicate with correspondence authors.

Authors should also understand that once published, their articles (and any additional files, including data sets, and analysis/computation data) will become publicly available. The license of published articles (and additional data) will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently featured on the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Agrisocionomics allows users to copy, distribute, display and perform work under license. Users need to attribute the author(s) and Agrisocionomics to distribute works in journals and other publication media. Unless otherwise stated, the author(s) is a public entity as soon as the article is published.