skip to main content

FARMER SATISFACTION ANALYSIS ON RICE FARMING INSURANCE PROGRAM IN TEGAL REGENCY

*Mirza Andrian Syah orcid  -  Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Mukson Mukson  -  Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Wiludjeng Roessali  -  Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2021 Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Farmers satisfaction in joining Rice Farming Insurance illustrates the program performance. The satisfaction of Rice Farming Insurance program can be measured through some attributes of satisfaction. Satisfaction attributes are assessed ranging from dissatisfied to very satisfied. This research aimed to determine the level of farmer satisfaction on Rice Farming Insurance program. This research was conducted in January – February 2020. Slovin method used for sampling method with total sample of 100 respondent, consist of 53 respondents were taken in Dukuhwaru District and 47 respondents were taken in Warureja District using proportional allocation. Locations in this research was choose with purposive method. Importance Performance Analysis and Customer Satisfaction Index were used to analyze. The result showed that Farmers were satisfied with the implementation of the Rice Farming Insurance program with CSI score of 79%. The attributes that need to be improved are the compensation requirements, the amount of coverage, the submission procedure, reviewing, and payment procedure of claims, and the time of approval and payment of claims. Those attributes were considered important by farmers yet still have low performance.  
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: rice farming insurance, CSI, IPA, satisfaction

Article Metrics:

  1. Aritonang, R. L. 2005. Kepuasan Pelanggan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta
  2. Azriani, Z., Refdinal, dan C. Paloma. 2018. Pelaksanaan Asuransi Usaha Tani Padi dalam Meningkatkan Ketahan Pangan di Kota Padang. Prosiding Seminar Nasional dalam Rangka Dies Natalis UNS Ke 42 Tahun 2018: Peran Keanekaragaman Hayati untuk Mendukung Indonesia sebagai Lumbung Pangan Dunia. Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta 18 April 2018. Halaman 36-43
  3. Bitner, M. J. dan V. A. Zeithaml. 2003. Service Marketing, 3rd Ed. Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi
  4. Boer, R. 2012. Asuransi iklim sebagai jaminan perlindungan ketahanan petani terhadap perubahan iklim. Prosiding Widyakarya Nasional Pangan dan Gizi X: Pemantapan Ketahanan Pangan dan perbaikan Gizi Berbasis Kemandirian dan Kearifan Lokal. Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia, Jakarta 20-21 November 2012. Halaman 685-700
  5. BPS. 2013. Laporan Hasil Sensus Pertanian 2013. https://st2013.bps.go.id/st2013esya/booklet /at0000.pdf Diakses pada 23 Februari 2020
  6. Dinas Pertanian dan Ketahanan Pangan Kabupaten Tegal. 2019. Data Peserta AUTP Kab. Tegal sampai Bulan Oktober 2019. Unpublished
  7. Direktorat Jendral Prasarana dan Sarana Pertanian. 2017. Pedoman Bantuan Premi Asuransi Usaha Tani Padi Tahun Anggaran 2017. http://psp.pertanian.go.id/assets/file/2019/Pedoman%20 Bantuan%20Premi%20Asuransi%20Usahatani%20Padi%20Tahun%202019.pdf Diakses pada 26 Juni 2019
  8. Engel, J. F., R. D. Blackwell, dan P. W. Miniard. 2004. Consumer Behavior, 8th Ed. The Dryden Press, Orlando
  9. Geelsya, Y. 2020. Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Petani terhadap Program Asuransi Usahatani Padi (AUTP) di Kecamatan Kuranji Kota Padang. Skripsi. Program Sarjana Universitas Andalas. Padang
  10. Liu, F., C. P. Corcoran, J. Tao, dan J. Cheng. 2016. Risk perception, insurance recognition and agricultural insurance behavior–An empirical based on dynamic panel data in 31 provinces of China. J. Disaster Risk Reduction. 20(2016) : 19-25
  11. Marphy, T. M. dan D. N. Priminingtyas. 2019. Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tingkat partisipasi petani dalam program asuransi usahatani padi (autp) di Desa Watugede, Kecamatan Singosari, Kabupaten Malang. J. Habitat. 30 (2) : 62-70
  12. Mustika, M., A. Fariyanti, dan N. Tinaprilla. 2019. Analisis sikap dan kepuasan petani terhadap atribut asuransi usahatani padi di Kabupaten Karawang Jawa Barat. J. Forum Agribisnis. 9(2) : 200-2014
  13. Mutaqin, A. K., A. Kudus, dan Y. Karyana. 2015. Metode parametrik untuk menghitung premi program asuransi usaha tani padi di Indonesia. J. Ethos. 5(1) : 15-24
  14. Portal Berita Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Tengah. 2019. Pemprov Jateng Siap Biayakan 100% Premi Asuransi Usaha Tani Padi. https://jatengprov.go.id/ publik/pemprov-jateng-siap-bayarkan-100-premi-asuransi-usaha-tani-padi/ Diakses pada 28 Februari 2020
  15. Rangkuti, F. 2006. Measuring Customer Satisfaction. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta
  16. Raswadi, D. 2018. Ratusan Petani Tegal Terima Klaim Asuransi. http://www.fokuspantura.com/ swasembada/1670-ratusan-petani-tegal-terima-klaim-asuransi Diakses pada 26 Juni 2019
  17. Safitri, D., M. Fahmid, dan P. Diansari. 2019. Respons petani terhadap program asuransi usaha tani padi (autp) di Kecamatan Sajoanging, Kabupaten Wajo, Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Hasanuddin Journal of Sustainable Agriculture. 1(1) : 17-25
  18. Simamora, B. 2002. Panduan Riset Perilaku Konsumen. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta
  19. Suarjana, I. W., I. W. Widia, dan K. Dharmawan. 2017. Penentuan nilai kontrak asuransi usaha tani tanaman kopi arabika berbasis indeks harga internasional. J. Biosistem dan Teknik Pertanian. 5(2) : 1-7
  20. Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta, Bandung
  21. Sukidin dan Mundir. 2005. Metode Penelitian. Insan Cendekia, Surabaya
  22. Tjiptono, F. 2011. Service Management Mewujudkan Layanan Prima, 2nd Ed. Andi, Yogyakarta

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.