Evaluation of Local Food Processing Training Design Based on ADDIE AND FAO Food Security Pillars in Central Java

Agus Subhan Prasetyo; Kim Dooley; Gary Briers; Darlene Locke; Michael Shehane

doi:10.14710/agrisocionomics.v10i2.31905

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/agrisocionomics.v10i2.31905

Evaluation of Local Food Processing Training Design Based on ADDIE AND FAO Food Security Pillars in Central Java

*Agus Subhan Prasetyo - Texas A&M University, United States

Kim Dooley - Texas A&M University, United States

Gary Briers - Texas A&M University, United States

Darlene Locke - Texas A&M University, United States

Michael Shehane - Texas A&M University, United States

under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{Agrisocionomics31905,
    author = {Agus Prasetyo and Kim Dooley and Gary Briers and Darlene Locke and Michael Shehane},
    title = {Evaluation of Local Food Processing Training Design Based on ADDIE AND FAO Food Security Pillars in Central Java},
    journal = {Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian},
  volume = {10},
    number = {2},
    year = {2026},
    keywords = {ADDIE model, content analysis, diversification of local food, FAO, food security, training program},
    abstract = { Food security is a strategic issue in Indonesia; however, evaluations of training programs supporting food security rarely systematically assess program design quality. This study analyzes the design of the Local Food Diversification Processing Training Program and evaluates its alignment with the Analysis and Design phases of the ADDIE model and the FAO’s Four Pillars of Food Security. A qualitative approach was employed, using content analysis of program reports and training materials prepared in 2024 by the Central Java Provincial Food Security Agency and its technical partners. The results indicate that the program design considered local food potential, participant characteristics, and objectives related to food processing skills and entrepreneurship development. Conceptually, the program design aligns with the FAO’s Four Pillars of Food Security. However, the needs analysis lacked standardized instruments, and learning outcome indicators had not been formulated in operational terms. These findings suggest that while the program has a strong substantive foundation, strengthening the Analysis and Design phases is necessary to enable more systematic measurement of its contribution to food security. The study confirms that the ADDIE model and the FAO’s Four Pillars can serve as an evaluation framework for assessing the design quality of food security-oriented training programs. },
   issn = {2621-9778},   pages = {617--631}  doi = {10.14710/agrisocionomics.v10i2.31905},
    url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/agrisocionomics/article/view/31905}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

Food security is a strategic issue in Indonesia; however, evaluations of training programs supporting food security rarely systematically assess program design quality. This study analyzes the design of the Local Food Diversification Processing Training Program and evaluates its alignment with the Analysis and Design phases of the ADDIE model and the FAO’s Four Pillars of Food Security. A qualitative approach was employed, using content analysis of program reports and training materials prepared in 2024 by the Central Java Provincial Food Security Agency and its technical partners. The results indicate that the program design considered local food potential, participant characteristics, and objectives related to food processing skills and entrepreneurship development. Conceptually, the program design aligns with the FAO’s Four Pillars of Food Security. However, the needs analysis lacked standardized instruments, and learning outcome indicators had not been formulated in operational terms. These findings suggest that while the program has a strong substantive foundation, strengthening the Analysis and Design phases is necessary to enable more systematic measurement of its contribution to food security. The study confirms that the ADDIE model and the FAO’s Four Pillars can serve as an evaluation framework for assessing the design quality of food security-oriented training programs.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues

Keywords: ADDIE model, content analysis, diversification of local food, FAO, food security, training program

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 10, No 2 (2026): June 2026

Barthakur, A., Joksimovic, S., Kovanovic, V., Corbett, F. C., Richey, M., & Pardo, A. (2022). Assessing the sequencing of learning objectives in a study program using evidence-based practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(8), 1429–1443. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2064971
Boliko, M. C. (2019). FAO and the situation of food security and nutrition in the world. Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology, 65, S4-S8. https://doi.org/10.3177/jnsv.65.S4Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
Charisma, D., Hermanto, B., Purnomo, M., Herawati, T., & Charina, A. (2025). Sustainable business through local strength: A qualitative study of financial, social, and cultural strategies in Bandung’s culinary micro-enterprises. Sustainability, 17(11), 5028. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17115028
Clapp, J. (2017). Food self-sufficiency: Making sense of it, and when it makes sense. Food Policy, 66, 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.12.001Cotter, S., Yamamoto, J., & Stevenson, C. (2023). A systematic characterization of food safety training interventions using the analyze, design, develop, implement, evaluate (ADDIE) instructional design framework. Food Control, 145, 109415.
Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186
Farrelly, D., Esposito, L., Maulbeck, J., Kates, L., Morris, J., & Espinet, I. (2025). The collaborative development of a performance-based rubric for coaching teacher candidates in fieldwork practice. The Teacher Educator, 61(2), 255–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2025.2544925
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2008). An introduction to the basic concepts of food security. https://www.fao.org/4/al936e/al936e00.pdf
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2017). The future of food and agriculture: Trends and challenges. https://www.fao.org/3/i6583e/i6583e.pdf
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2018). Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327(5967), 812–818. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383
Gross, G., Ling, R., Richardson, B., & Quan, N. (2023). In-person or virtual training?: Comparing the effectiveness of community-based training. American Journal of Distance Education, 37(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2022.2029090
Holmes, C., & Mellanby, E. (2022). Debriefing strategies for interprofessional simulation—a qualitative study. Advances in Simulation, 7(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-022-00214-3
Koc, E. (2020). Design and evaluation of a higher education distance eap course by using the ADDIE model. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(73), 522-531. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.526335
Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis. Sage Publications, Inc
Martin, F. (2011). Instructional Design and the Importance of Instructional Alignment. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 35(12), 955–972. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920802466483
Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), 1089. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089
Molenda, M. (2015). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 34–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4930420508
Prasetyo, A. S., Dooley, K. E., Widyastuti, K., & Firdauzi, A. (2025). Comparing national food security policies in Indonesia and Thailand: A systematic meta-synthesis approach. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 9, 1676641. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1676641
Prasetyo, A. S., & Firdauzi, A. (2023). Determinants of farmer's participation in implementation community empowerment: A case study of thematic village in Indonesia. Habitat, 34(2), 178-189. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.habitat.2023.034.2.16
Prasetyo, A. S., & Dooley, K. (April 2025). Challenges facing extension agents in the implementation of participatory communication on the urban agriculture program at Semarang, Indonesia [Poster presentation]. Conference of the Association for International Agricultural and Extension Education (AIAEE), Scotland. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26387.59682
Rijanta, R. (2020). The prospects & challenges of local foods production in rural Java, Indonesia: the case of Kulonprogo Regency. Human Geographies: Journal of Studies & Research in Human Geography, 14(2), 321-335. https://doi.org/10.5719/hgeo.2019.141.9
Sari, R., Muslim, M., & Ameliana, Y. (2024). Strategies for improving local food security in developing countries. Advances in Community Services Research, 2(2), 98-110. https://doi.org/10.60079/acsr.v2i2.364
Sitzmann, T., & Weinhardt, J. M. (2019). Approaching evaluation from a multilevel perspective: A comprehensive analysis of the indicators of training effectiveness. Human Resource Management Review, 29(2), 253-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.04.001
Torrance, H. (2007). Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post‐secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(3), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594070159186
Vicary, S., Young, A., & Hicks, S. (2017). A reflective journal as learning process and contribution to quality and validity in interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Social Work, 16(4), 550-565. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325016635244

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Starting from 2021, the author(s) whose article is published in the Agrisocionomics journal attain the copyright for their article. By submitting the manuscript to Agrisocionomics, the author(s) agree with this policy. No special document approval is required.

The author(s) guarantee that:

Their article is original, written by the mentioned author(s),
Has never been published before,
Does not contain statements that violate the law, and
Does not violate the rights of others, is subject to copyright held exclusively by the author(s), and is free from the rights of third parties, and that the necessary written permission to quote from other sources has been obtained by the author(s).

The author(s) retain all rights to the published work, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:

Copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article, such as patents,
The right to use the substance of the article in its own future works, including lectures and books,
The right to reproduce the article for its own purposes,
The right to archive all versions of the article, and
The right to enter into separate additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of published versions of the article (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.

If the article was prepared jointly by more than one author, each author submitting the manuscript warrants that they have been given permission by all co-authors to agree to copyright and license notices (agreements) on their behalf, and agree to notify the co-authors of the terms of this policy. Agrisocionomics will not be held responsible for anything that may arise because of the writer's internal dispute. Agrisocionomics will only communicate with correspondence authors.

Authors should also understand that once published, their articles (and any additional files, including data sets, and analysis/computation data) will become publicly available. The license of published articles (and additional data) will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently featured on the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Agrisocionomics allows users to copy, distribute, display and perform work under license. Users need to attribute the author(s) and Agrisocionomics to distribute works in journals and other publication media. Unless otherwise stated, the author(s) is a public entity as soon as the article is published.