skip to main content

A Comparative Risk Analysis of Semi-Organic and Inorganic Shallot Farming in Sukorejo Village Rejoso District Nganjuk Regency

*Noor Rizkiyah orcid scopus  -  University of Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Nisa Hafi Idhoh Fitriana  -  University of Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Isfia Diana Putri  -  University of Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to examine the production, pricing, and income risks as well as the distinctions between semi-organic and inorganic shallot farming in Sukorejo Village, Rejoso District, Nganjuk Regency. The study was carried out between November and December of 2024. This study was conducted using a survey of 75 shallot farmers selected through stratified random sampling. This study employed the Independent Sample T-test and Analysis of Risk (CV). The result indicate that production, price and income risk for both farming systems were generaly low. The factors contributing to the risks in production, price, and income included severe weather, pests and diseases, variable selling prices, and elevated farming costs. Statical testing showed no significant differences in production, price and income risks between semi organic and inorganic farming systems. The lack of difference was attributed to the similarity in land and irrigation practices for both semi-organic and inorganic forms, along with farmers' insufficient awareness regarding pure organic farming.
Fulltext Email colleagues
Keywords: Shallot Farming; Coefficient Variation; Semi-organic; Holtriculture

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
  1. Adetya, A., & Suprapti, I. (2021). Analisis Produksi, Pendapatan, dan Risiko Usahatani Bawang Merah di Kecamatan Sokobanah Kabupaten Sampang Provinsi Jawa Timur. Agriscience, 2(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.21107/agriscience.v2i1.11201
  2. Andrea, R., Aliyah, I., & Yudana, G. (2021). Studi Kesesuaian Lahan Pertanian Sawah Organik (Studi kasus: Desa Gempol, Kabupaten Klaten). Region: Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah Dan Perencanaan Partisipatif, 16(2), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.20961/region.v16i2.25468
  3. Anggraini, I., Fauzi, M., & Rifiana. (2021). Analisis Risiko Produksi Bawang Merah (Allium ascalonicum L.) di Desa Suato Lama Kecamatan Salam Babaris Kabupaten Tapin. Frontier Agribisnis: Jurnal Tugas Akhir Mahasiswa (JTAM), 5(1), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.20527/frontbiz.v5i1.6027
  4. Annisa, R. V, & Agustina, T. (2024). Analisis Risiko Usahatani Bawang Merah dan Perilaku Petani dalam Menghadapi Risiko di Kecamatan Pacet Kabupaten Mojokerto. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 8(3), 1099–1111. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jepa.2024.008.03.23
  5. Asminar, Riki, & Susilawati, W. (2021). Analisis Risiko Usahatani Kelapa Sawit di Kecamatan Limbur Lubuk Mengkuang Kabupaten Bungo. Jurnal Agri Sains, 5(1), 95–
  6. https://doi.org/10.36355/jas.v5i1.696
  7. BPS Kabupaten Nganjuk. (2025). Kabupaten Nganjuk dalam Angka 2025. Nganjuk: Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Nganjuk
  8. Darmawan, R. (2023). Outlook Komoditas Pertanian Subsektor Hortikultura Bawang Merah. Jakarta: Kementerian Pertanian
  9. Fauzan, M. (2016). Pendapatan, Risiko, dan Efisiensi Ekonomi Usahatani Bawang Merah Di Kabupaten Bantul. AGRARIS: Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development Research, 2(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.18196/agr.2231
  10. Firdaus, M. W., Syafrial, & Nugroho, T. W. (2024). Faktor-Faktor yang Berpengaruh terhadap Keputusan Adopsi Padi Organik dan Perbandingan Pendapatannya di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Pangan, 33(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.33964/jp.v33i1.835
  11. Fitri, Suryani, D., & Nadira. (2023). Analisis Risiko Produksi dan Pendapatan Usahatani Bawang Merah Varietas Tajuk dan Manjung di Kecamatan Banggae Timur, Kabupaten Majene. Mimbar Agribisnis: Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis, 9(1), 925–934. https://doi.org/10.25157/ma.v9i1.9205
  12. Hasanah, J., Rondhi, M., & Hapsari, T. D. (2018). Analisis Risiko Produksi Usahatani Padi Organik di Desa Rowosari Kecamatan Sumberjambe Kabupaten Jember. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia, 6(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.29244/jai.2018.6.1.23-34
  13. Mutmainah, L., Efendy, & Zaini, A. (2022). Analisis Risiko Usahatani Bawang Merah Di Kecamatan Belo Kabupaten Bima. Agimansion, 1(1), 1–19
  14. Nurlinda, N., Arifin, A., & Sadat, M. A. (2020). Risiko Produksi dan Faktor Produksi yang Mempengaruhi Usaha Tani Padi Pada Lahan Sawah Tadah Hujan Kelurahan Soreang Kecamatan Lau Kabupaten Maros. Jurnal Agribis, 11(1), 33–43
  15. Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi Pertanian. (2022). Analisis Kinerja Perdagangan Bawang Merah. Jakarta: Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi Pertanian
  16. Ramadhani, P. A., Amruddin, & Saleh, M. I. (2025). Risk Analysis of Costs and Income of Clove Farming in Balassuka Village, Tombolopao Subdistrict, Gowa District. Tarjih: Agribusiness Development Journal, 5(1), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.47030/tadj.v5i01.902
  17. Siskaperbapo. (2023). Harga Produsen Bawang Merah. https://siskaperbapo.jatimprov.go.id/produsen/tabel
  18. Utami, R. A., Firdaus, R. N., Aji, J. M. M., & Agustina, T. (2024). Comparative Analysis and Factors Affecting Income on Shallot Farming of Biru Lancor and Batu Ijo Varieties in Probolinggo Regency. Jurnal Agrisep: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 23(2), 623–642. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.23.02.623-642
  19. Wang, R., Wang, C., Liu, T., Chen, Y., Liu, B., Xiao, J., Luo, Y., & Chen, L. (2025). Effects of Different Organic Materials and Reduced Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on Sorghum Yield and Soil Nutrients. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90584-1
  20. Winahyu, N., Mulyaningtiyas, R. D., Lestari, R. D., & Sari, P. N. (2025). Risiko Produksi Padi Semiorganik dan Anorganik. Jurnal Pertanian Cemara, 22(1), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.24929/fp.v22i1.4284
  21. Yasa, I. M. W., Bawarta, I. G. A. A., & Arisen, G. M. K. (2022). Analisis Risiko Produksi Usahatani Bawang Merah. Benchmark, 3(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.46821/benchmark.v3i1.264

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.