MEASURING THE SATISFACTION AND LOYALTY LEVEL OF MILLENNIAL FARMERS: A CASE STUDY ON SUGARCANE FARMING IN THE PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN FARMER AND PTPN XI EAST JAVA

Ahadyah Ayu Umaiya; Irham Irham; Hani Perwitasari

doi:10.14710/agrisocionomics.v8i1.18351

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/agrisocionomics.v8i1.18351

MEASURING THE SATISFACTION AND LOYALTY LEVEL OF MILLENNIAL FARMERS: A CASE STUDY ON SUGARCANE FARMING IN THE PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN FARMER AND PTPN XI EAST JAVA

Ahadyah Ayu Umaiya - Department of Agricultural Socio-economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada, D.I. Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia

*Irham Irham - Department of Agricultural Socio-economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada, D.I. Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia

Hani Perwitasari - Department of Agricultural Socio-economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada, D.I. Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{Agrisocionomics18351,
    author = {Ahadyah Umaiya and Irham Irham and Hani Perwitasari},
    title = {MEASURING THE SATISFACTION AND LOYALTY LEVEL OF MILLENNIAL FARMERS: A CASE STUDY ON SUGARCANE FARMING IN THE PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN FARMER AND PTPN XI EAST JAVA},
    journal = {Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian},
  volume = {8},
    number = {1},
    year = {2024},
    keywords = {loyalty, millenial farmers, partnership, satisfaction, sugarcane},
    abstract = { The PTPN XI’s sugarcane supply in the last five years has tended to decline. A strong partnership between sugarcane farmers and PTPN XI can be an alternative solution to overcome the scarcity of the sugarcane supply by being shown high satisfaction and loyalty. The aims of this study are: 1) to compare the level of satisfaction of millennial and old sugarcane farmers to the performance of PTPN XI and 2) to compare the level of loyalty of millennial and old sugarcane farmers in partnership. The millennial and old sugarcane farmers' satisfaction levels are used to analyze CSI, gap analysis, Z-test, and IPA. The loyalty levels used average table analysis and Z-test. The study samples were obtained from four sugar mills areas of PTPN XI: Asembagoes, Soedhono, Wonolangan, and Pradjekan.  The results showed that the satisfaction level category of millennial farmers was quite satisfied (65.68%), while the satisfaction level of old sugarcane farmers was satisfied (67.04%). Statistically, the results of the Z-test showed a significance value of 0.021. There was a difference in the average satisfaction level between millennial and old sugarcane farmers, where the satisfaction level of sugarcane farmers was higher than millennials. However, the study found that the loyalty of old sugarcane farmers was more elevated than millennials using the Z-test with a significance value of 0.011. Through this study, it is expected that the partnership between PTPN XI and the sugarcane farmers is getting better quality to achieve increased sugar production. },
   issn = {2621-9778},   pages = {242--259}  doi = {10.14710/agrisocionomics.v8i1.18351},
    url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/agrisocionomics/article/view/18351}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

The PTPN XI’s sugarcane supply in the last five years has tended to decline. A strong partnership between sugarcane farmers and PTPN XI can be an alternative solution to overcome the scarcity of the sugarcane supply by being shown high satisfaction and loyalty. The aims of this study are: 1) to compare the level of satisfaction of millennial and old sugarcane farmers to the performance of PTPN XI and 2) to compare the level of loyalty of millennial and old sugarcane farmers in partnership. The millennial and old sugarcane farmers' satisfaction levels are used to analyze CSI, gap analysis, Z-test, and IPA. The loyalty levels used average table analysis and Z-test. The study samples were obtained from four sugar mills areas of PTPN XI: Asembagoes, Soedhono, Wonolangan, and Pradjekan. The results showed that the satisfaction level category of millennial farmers was quite satisfied (65.68%), while the satisfaction level of old sugarcane farmers was satisfied (67.04%). Statistically, the results of the Z-test showed a significance value of 0.021. There was a difference in the average satisfaction level between millennial and old sugarcane farmers, where the satisfaction level of sugarcane farmers was higher than millennials. However, the study found that the loyalty of old sugarcane farmers was more elevated than millennials using the Z-test with a significance value of 0.011. Through this study, it is expected that the partnership between PTPN XI and the sugarcane farmers is getting better quality to achieve increased sugar production.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: loyalty, millenial farmers, partnership, satisfaction, sugarcane

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 8, No 1 (2024): March 2024

Recent articles

INCOME ANALYSIS OF MAIZE FARMERS ON RUBBER PLANTATION HIATEN LAND UTILIZATION SUNGEI PUTIH RESEARCH UNIT IMPROVING THE WORK PERFORMANCE OF AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION WORKERS THROUGH INCREASING CAPACITY, WILLINGNESS, AND OPPORTUNITY OPTIMIZATION OF GEDONG GINCU MANGO DISTRIBUTION COSTS IN MAJALENGKA DISTRICT More recent articles

Alfasanah, L.D. (2019). The loyalty of the sugarcane farmer is linked to the farmer's satisfaction in partnering case studies in PG Kembroong Sidoarjo East Java. Undergraduate Thesis. Undergraduate Program of Brawijaya University. Malang. http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/173069/
BPS. (2021). Sugarcane Indonesia Statistics. BPS-Statistics Indonesia
Caruna, A. (2002). Service Loyalty: The Effect of Service Quality and The Mediating Role of Customer Satisfaction. European Journal of Marketing 36, (7/8), 811-955. https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/bitstream/123456789/22152/1/2002%20EJM%2036(7).pdf
Dirjen Perkebunan. (2022). Program Percepatan Swasembada Gula Konsumsi. Diakses pada 8 April 2022 di Seminar Gula Nasional Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Petani Tebu Menuju Swasembada Gula Nasional Berkelanjutan
Durianto, Darmadi, Sugiarto, & Tony, S. (2001). Strategy to Conquer the Market through Equity Research and Brand Behavior. Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Ekawati, M.P. (2013). Analysis of Partner Sugarcane Farmers' Satisfaction with the Partnership with PG Pakis Baru. Undergraduate Thesis. Undergraduate Program of Bogor Agricultural University. Bogor. https://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/65980
Ghozali, I. (2016). Multivariate Analysis Application with IBM SPSS 23(VIII) Program. Diponegoro University Press
Hafsah, M.J. (2000). Kemitraan Usaha Konsepsi dan Strategi. Pustaka Sinar Harapan
Fadilah, R. (2010). Analysis of the partnership between the Jatitujuh sugar factory and smallholder sugarcane farmers in Majalengka West Java. Skripsi. IPB University. West Java
Irawan, H. (2004). 10 Satisfaction Costumer Principals. PT Elex Media Komputindo
Kalauz, M.S., Vranesevic, T., & Tratnik, M. (2011). The Clothing Brand Loyalty of Teenagers: Differences Between Loyalty and Desire to be Loyal. International Journal of Management Cases, 13(4), 156-164. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263298779
Khoirunnisa, K. (2019). The benefits of the sugarcane farmer partnership pattern with PTPN XI in increasing the productivity and income of sugarcane farmers in the Semboro Business Unit. Skripsi. Gadjah Mada University. Yogyakarta
Kotler, P., & Gary, A. (2010). Principles of Marketing 13th Edition. Pearson Prentice Hall
Lestari, R.A. (2021). The partnership of Independent Sugarcane Farmers at PT. Perkebunan Nusantara (PTPN) XIV Takalar Sugar Factory. Thesis. Magister Program of Hasanuddin University. Makassar. http://repository.unhas.ac.id/
Lukito, A. (2017). Analysis of Smallholder Sugarcane Farming and Farmer Loyalty is Related to Farmer Behavior, The Role of The Government and Sugar Mills (A Case Study in Pasuruan Regency, East Java). Thesis. Master Degree Program of Diponegoro University. Semarang. http://eprints.undip.ac.id/60740/
Mardani, Nur, T.M., & Satriawan, H. (2017). Analisis Usahatani Tanaman Pangan Jagung di Kecamatan Juli Kabupaten Bireuen. Jurnal S. Pertanian, 1(3), 203–212. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/210883-analisis-usaha-tani-tanaman-pangan-jagun.pdf
Marconi, J. (2002). Beyond Branding. Prentice Hall
Mazwan, M.Z., & Masyhuri. 2019. Allocation of Input Use for Sugar Cane Production in People's Plantations in East Java (Case Study of PTPN XI's Plasma Sugar Cane Farmers). JEPA,3(1), 138-151. https://jepa.ub.ac.id/index.php/jepa/article/view/163
Minister of Agriculture RI. (2019). Regulation of the Minister of Agriculture of the Republic of Indonesia Number 04 of 2019 concerning Guidelines for the Movement for the Development of Agricultural Human Resources Towards a World Food Barn 2045. Ministry of Agriculture
PTPN XI. (2022). Sustainability Report Sugar The Next Level. Retrieved January 10, 2023, from https://ptpn11.co.id/page/annual
Rahayu, S.P. (2013). Sugarcane Farmer Institutional Strengthening. Retrieved September 4, 2022, from https://cybex.pertanian.go.id/detail-print.php?id=52379
Rouzaneh, D., Yazdanpanah, M., & Jahromi, A.B. (2021). Evaluating micro-irrigation system performance through assessment of farmers’ satisfaction: implications for adoption, longevity, and water use efficiency. Agricultural Water Management, 246(2021), 1-8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377420321995
Umunnakwe, V.C., Pyasi, V.K., & Pande, A.K. (2014). Factors Influencing Involvement in Agricultural Livelihood Activities Among Rural Youth in Jabalpur District of Madhya Pradesh India. International Journal of Agricultural Policy and Study, 2(8), 288–295. https://journalissues.org/ijapr/abstract/umunnakwe-et-al/
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2007). Study Methods for Business Students 4th Edition Financial Times Prentice Hall. Edinburgh Gate
Susilowati, S.H. (2016). The Phenomenon of Aging Farmers and Reducing Young Workers and Their Implications for Agricultural Dev Policy. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 34(1), 35–55. https://repository.pertanian.go.id/items/ad543dae-2a00-4f01-9e29-4650aa58b0ae
Widayasari, N., Mariyono, J., dan Proyoga, K. (2023). Level of Satisfaction of Coffee Farmers at Rahayu IV Farming Group with Towards Bakti BCA Program in Sirap Village Semarang Central Jawa. Jurnal Sungkai, 11(1), 31-44
Wilianto, H. (2019). Employee Mapping of PT Mitra Tritunggal Sakti. AGORA, 7(1). https://publication.petra.ac.id/index.php/manajemen-bisnis/article/view/8182/7375
Yazdanpanah, M., Zamani, G.H., Stigler, S.H., Monfared, N., & Yaghoubi J. (2013). Measuring the Satisfaction of Crop Insurance A Modified American Customer Satisfaction Model Approach Applied to Iranian Farmers. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 5, 19-27. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420913000265
Yulius, Asmani, N., Asyiek, F., Alamsyah, I., & Adriani, D. (2016). Assistance in The Preparation of Activity and Financial Bookkeeping for Independent and Group Farming in Pemulutan Ulu Village, Pemulutan District, Ogan Ilir Regency. Jurnal Pengabdian Sriwijaya, 571-580. https://repository.unsri.ac.id/27564/

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Starting from 2021, the author(s) whose article is published in the Agrisocionomics journal attain the copyright for their article. By submitting the manuscript to Agrisocionomics, the author(s) agree with this policy. No special document approval is required.

The author(s) guarantee that:

Their article is original, written by the mentioned author(s),
Has never been published before,
Does not contain statements that violate the law, and
Does not violate the rights of others, is subject to copyright held exclusively by the author(s), and is free from the rights of third parties, and that the necessary written permission to quote from other sources has been obtained by the author(s).

The author(s) retain all rights to the published work, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:

Copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article, such as patents,
The right to use the substance of the article in its own future works, including lectures and books,
The right to reproduce the article for its own purposes,
The right to archive all versions of the article, and
The right to enter into separate additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of published versions of the article (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.

If the article was prepared jointly by more than one author, each author submitting the manuscript warrants that they have been given permission by all co-authors to agree to copyright and license notices (agreements) on their behalf, and agree to notify the co-authors of the terms of this policy. Agrisocionomics will not be held responsible for anything that may arise because of the writer's internal dispute. Agrisocionomics will only communicate with correspondence authors.

Authors should also understand that once published, their articles (and any additional files, including data sets, and analysis/computation data) will become publicly available. The license of published articles (and additional data) will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently featured on the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Agrisocionomics allows users to copy, distribute, display and perform work under license. Users need to attribute the author(s) and Agrisocionomics to distribute works in journals and other publication media. Unless otherwise stated, the author(s) is a public entity as soon as the article is published.